Combined metabolic activators improve cognitive functions in Alzheimer’s disease patients: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase-II trial
Translational Neurodegeneration volume 12, Article number: 4 (2023)
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is associated with metabolic abnormalities linked to critical elements of neurodegeneration. We recently administered combined metabolic activators (CMA) to the AD rat model and observed that CMA improves the AD-associated histological parameters in the animals. CMA promotes mitochondrial fatty acid uptake from the cytosol, facilitates fatty acid oxidation in the mitochondria, and alleviates oxidative stress.
Here, we designed a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase-II clinical trial and studied the effect of CMA administration on the global metabolism of AD patients. One-dose CMA included 12.35 g L-serine (61.75%), 1 g nicotinamide riboside (5%), 2.55 g N-acetyl-L-cysteine (12.75%), and 3.73 g L-carnitine tartrate (18.65%). AD patients received one dose of CMA or placebo daily during the first 28 days and twice daily between day 28 and day 84. The primary endpoint was the difference in the cognitive function and daily living activity scores between the placebo and the treatment arms. The secondary aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of CMA. A comprehensive plasma metabolome and proteome analysis was also performed to evaluate the efficacy of the CMA in AD patients.
We showed a significant decrease of AD Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) score on day 84 vs day 0 (P = 0.00001, 29% improvement) in the CMA group. Moreover, there was a significant decline (P = 0.0073) in ADAS-Cog scores (improvement of cognitive functions) in the CMA compared to the placebo group in patients with higher ADAS-Cog scores. Improved cognitive functions in AD patients were supported by the relevant alterations in the hippocampal volumes and cortical thickness based on imaging analysis. Moreover, the plasma levels of proteins and metabolites associated with NAD + and glutathione metabolism were significantly improved after CMA treatment.
Our results indicate that treatment of AD patients with CMA can lead to enhanced cognitive functions and improved clinical parameters associated with phenomics, metabolomics, proteomics and imaging analysis.
Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04044131 Registered 17 July 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04044131
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterised by progressive synaptic and axonal dysfunction, neuronal loss and cognitive decline . There is growing evidence that AD is closely associated with metabolic abnormalities and oxidative stress linked to critical elements of neurodegeneration, such as mitochondrial dysfunction and bioenergetic impairment [2, 3]. Indeed, increasing data indicate that systemic metabolic disorders, such as insulin resistance, are strongly associated with bioenergetic failure of nerve cells [4, 5]. This can manifest as cognitive impairment and brain-specific neuropathology, and share common pathogenic mechanisms with AD, such as impaired glucose metabolism, oxidative stress, insulin resistance, and amyloidogenesis [4, 6, 7]. Recent evidence suggests that patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are at an increased risk of developing AD .
Although AD is defined by accumulation of abnormal amyloid and tau proteins , the mechanistic assumption of linear causality between the amyloid cascade and cognitive dysfunction in AD is still lacking, since amyloid-lowering approaches have failed to provide cognitive benefits in human clinical trials . A growing body of evidence suggests that impaired brain energy metabolism and mitochondrial dysfunction in AD may contribute to cognitive decline. At the same time, different drugs for metabolic diseases are prescribed to improve metabolic status, slow cognitive decline or prevent dementia progression . Positron emission tomography studies have revealed baseline cerebral glucose metabolism abnormalities before the onset of cognitive symptoms in AD patients . In addition, recent preclinical data indicated that ageing and AD are associated with the reorganisation of brain energy metabolism and mitochondrial dysfunction, including an overall increase in lactate secretion and downregulation of bioenergetic enzymes [12, 13].
Several studies have suggested that impaired brain energy metabolism and oxidative stress are associated with mitochondrial degeneration and abnormal protein accumulation during the progress of AD [14,15,16,17,18]. In this context, emerging evidence suggests that the autophagy/lysosome pathways play a critical role in removing damaged mitochondria (mitophagy), and dysfunction of autophagy results in the accumulation of dysfunctional mitochondria in neurons . This opens up a new window of beneficial effects of interventions that maintain mitochondrial health and/or stimulate mitophagy in the neurodegenerative process in AD . In line with this, the beneficial effects of nicotinamide on mitochondrial integrity, autophagy and bioenergetics-related signaling in brain cells are associated with reduced accumulation of abnormal Aβ and tau in the hippocampus, and lead to the improved cognitive performance in transgenic mice [21, 22]. Also, recent human studies suggested that the impaired hippocampal mitophagy in AD patients responds well to mitophagy enhancement strategies and such treatment finally improves AD-related tau pathologies in human neuronal cells and memory deficits in transgenic models .
Combining multiple compounds to both reduce oxidative injury and improve bioenergetics, in other words, to target multiple pathways simultaneously, has been proposed as a therapeutic strategy associated more likely with successful translational outcomes . Previous research identified limited serine availability, reduced de novo glutathione (GSH) synthesis, and altered NAD+ metabolism in a transgenic mouse model of AD based on multi-omics profiling . While NAD+ is reduced in the AD animal models, NAD+ augmentation mitigates Aβ, tau, and metabolic pathologies in laboratory models of AD [23, 26]. These findings have been confirmed by human metabolomic data showing significantly altered cerebrospinal fluid levels of acylcarnitine in patients with AD, which are correlated with the decline of cognitive function and structural abnormalities of the brain [27, 28].
In addition to the above-mentioned metabolic underpinnings of AD, several neuroimaging studies have revealed alterations of critical cognitive regions, including hippocampus, cortex, and inferior parietal, middle frontal and occipital regions . For instance, Nagata et al. showed that the vulnerability of the hippocampus plays a potential role in memory and executive dysfunction in AD patients [30, 31]. Similarly, several neuroimaging studies showed that cortical thickness plays a critical role in AD pathophysiology [32, 33]. Despite these promising studies, no research has evaluated the common pathophysiological mechanisms shared by systemic metabolic alterations and specific brain areas involved in cognitive deterioration in AD patients.
Based on the integrative network analysis of multi-omics data of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, we have developed the combined metabolic activators (CMA) consisting of L-serine, N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), nicotinamide riboside (NR), and L-carnitine tartrate (LCAT, the salt form of L-carnitine) and showed that administration of CMA activates mitochondria, and improves inflammatory markers in animals and humans [34,35,36,37,38]. We have found that the CMA administration promotes mitochondrial fatty acid uptake from the cytosol, facilitates fatty acid oxidation in the mitochondria, and alleviates oxidative stress . Global metabolomic and proteomic profiling revealed that CMA administration effectively increases fatty acid oxidation and de novo GSH synthesis . Moreover, plasma levels of metabolites associated with antioxidant metabolism and inflammation are improved in COVID-19 patients treated with CMA compared to the placebo . Recently, we tested the individual metabolic activators and CMA in the streptozotocin-induced AD-like rats and showed that CMA administration significantly improved behavioural scores in parallel with neurohistological outcomes in this model .
Based on these studies, we hypothesized that CMA administration may be a promising treatment for improving the metabolic parameters and brain functions in AD patients. Here, we designed a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled human phase 2 clinical study to investigate the effect of CMA administration on the global metabolism of AD patients through comprehensive phenomics, metabolomics, proteomics and imaging analyses.
Materials and methods
Clinical trial design and oversight
Patients for this randomised, parallel-group, two-arm, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study were recruited at the Faculty of Medicine, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Antalya, Turkey and Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before initiating any trial-related procedures. An independent external data-monitoring committee oversaw the safety of the participants and the risk–benefit analysis. The trial was conducted following Good Clinical Practice guidelines and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey (Date:22.01.2020, Decision No: 7), and registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ with Clinical Trial ID: NCT04044131.
Eligibility criteria of clinical trial participants
Patients were enrolled in the trial if they were over 50 years of age with mild to moderate AD according to AD Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog; ADAS ≥ 12) and the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB; CDR ≤ 2). Patients were diagnosed according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 diagnostic criteria. Patients with a history of stroke, severe brain trauma, and toxic drug exposure were excluded. The main characteristics of the patients are summarised in Additional file 1: Dataset S1. The inclusion, exclusion, and randomisation criteria are described in detail in Additional file 2: Supplementary Appendix.
Randomisation, interventions, and follow-up
Patients were randomly assigned to receive CMA or placebo (2:1). Patient information (patient number, date of birth, initials) was entered into the web-based randomisation system, and the randomisation codes were entered into the electronic case report form. All clinical staff were blinded to treatment, as were the participants.
Treatment started on the day of diagnosis. Both placebo and CMA were provided in powdered form in identical plastic bottles containing a single dose to be dissolved in water and taken orally, one dose in the morning after breakfast and one dose in the evening after dinner. Each dose of CMA contained 12.35 g L-serine (61.75%), 1 g nicotinamide riboside (5%), 2.55 g N-acetyl-L-cysteine (12.75%), and 3.73 g L-carnitine tartrate (18.65%). All patients received one dose daily after dinner during the first 28 days and two doses after breakfast and dinner, respectively, from day 28 to day 84. All patients came for a follow-up visit on day 84. Further information is provided in the study protocol (Additional file 2: Supplementary Appendix).
The primary endpoint in the original protocol was to assess the clinical efficacy of CMA in AD patients. For this purpose, cognitive function and daily living activity were assessed by ADAS-Cog, AD Cooperative Study—Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) after 12-week administration, and compared between the placebo and the treatment arms. The secondary aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of CMA. All protocol amendments were authorised and approved by the sponsor, the institutional review board, the independent ethics committee, and the pertinent regulatory authorities. Sample size was estimated by statistical power analysis (Additional file 2: Supplementary Appendix).
The number and characteristics of adverse events, serious adverse events, and treatment discontinuation due to CMA were reported as key safety endpoints from the beginning of the study to the end of the follow-up period. The changes in vital signs, baseline values, and treatment status were recorded on days 0 and 84. A complete list of the endpoints is provided in Additional file 2: Supplementary Appendix.
Plasma levels of proteins were determined with the Olink panels (Olink Bioscience, Uppsala, Sweden). Briefly, each sample was incubated with DNA-labelled antibody pairs (proximity probes). When an antibody pair binds to its corresponding antigens, the corresponding DNA tails form an amplicon by proximity extension, which can be quantified by high-throughput, real-time PCR. Probe solution (3 μl) was mixed with 1 μl of sample and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Then 96 μl of extension solution containing extension enzyme and PCR reagents for the pre-amplification step was added. The extension products were mixed with detection reagents and primers and loaded on the chip for qPCR analysis with the BioMark HD System (Fluidigm Corporation, South San Francisco, CA). To minimise inter- and intra-run variation, the data were normalised to both internal and interplate control. Normalised data were expressed in arbitrary units (Normalized Protein eXpression, NPX) on a log2 scale and linearised with the formula 2NPX. A high NPX indicates a high protein concentration. The limit of detection, determined for each of the assays, was defined as three standard deviations above the negative control (background).
Untargeted metabolomics analysis
Plasma samples were collected on days 0 and 84 for untargeted metabolite profiling by Metabolon (Durham, NC). The samples were prepared with an automated system (MicroLab STAR, Hamilton Company, Reno, NV). For quality control purposes, a recovery standard was added before the first step of the extraction. To remove proteins and dissociated small molecules bound to protein or trapped in the precipitated protein matrix and recover chemically diverse metabolites, proteins were precipitated with methanol under vigorous shaking for 2 min and centrifuged. The resulting extract was divided into four fractions: one each for analysis by ultraperformance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy (UPLC-MS/MS) with positive ion-mode electrospray ionisation, UPLC-MS/MS with negative ion-mode electrospray ionisation, and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; and one fraction was reserved as a backup.
Determination of clinical variables informing response to CMA administration
The patient groups with low and high levels of each clinical parameter were established based on the median score for that clinical parameter across all patients on day 0. Patients scoring at or below the median were placed in the low group; patients scoring above the median were placed in the high group. ADAS-Cog scores were measured over different time points, and statistical significance was tested between time points by using a paired t-test. Clinical parameters were deemed informative for the response to CMA if precisely one group (low or high) exhibited more statistically significant changes in ADAS-Cog in the CMA group than in the placebo group.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters and analysis
Among the entire patient cohort, 40 MRI-compatible patients, 29 in the CMA group and 11 in the placebo group, were recruited for the structural MRI study. Structural MRI was recorded in the 1.5 T SIGNA Explorer MRI device with a 16-channel head coil (General Electric Company, USA).
Hippocampal subfield segmentation and grey/white matter volumetric segmentation were performed using FreeSurfer image analysis software (version 6.0.0) and the integrated hippocampal subfield segmentation module . All T1-weighted images were preprocessed with the standard Freesurfer processing pipeline using the “recon-all” script. In addition to the default processing pipeline, the high-resolution T2-weighted images of each participant were submitted using the “hippocampal-subfield-T1” measure. The Freesurfer algorithm segments 12 hippocampal subfields: hippocampal tail, subiculum, CA1, hippocampal fissure, presubiculum, parasubiculum, molecular layer, granule cell layer of the DG, CA2–3, CA4, fimbria, and the hippocampal–amygdaloid transition area. The volume estimates of these subfields (combined for the right and left hemispheres of each subfield) were then used in the final analysis.
To obtain hippocampal subfield measurements, each T1 image was processed using FreeSurfer version 7.1.0 (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/). A standard and automatic reconstruction algorithm was used for pre-processing [42, 43] and hippocampal subfield segmentation steps . The hippocampal subfield segmentation of each subject was visually inspected and determined to be free from errors by two independent researchers. Outliers of each subregion volume were defined as data more than 1.5 interquartile range below the first quartile or above the third quartile, and these data were included in the analyses. We used the composite subfield definitions based on the detailed segmentations performed by FreeSurfer  and defined the anterior region as the sum of the regions CA1, CA3, CA4, molecular layer, granular cell layers of the dentate gyrus (GC/DG), subiculum, and presubiculum in the hippocampal head. The posterior region consisted of the same subregions in the hippocampal body and the hippocampal tail. The CA composite region was defined as the sum of the volumes of the CA1 region, CA3 region, subiculum, and molecular layer. The DG composite region included the CA4 region and the GC/DG. The subiculum composite region was defined as the presubiculum of the FreeSurfer subfields. The volume of each subfield was calculated separately in the anterior (head) and posterior (body) regions of the hippocampus and hippocampal brain volume was standardised by dividing each by the intracranial volume (ICV), giving ICV-corrected regional brain volume data.
Cortical thickness was measured using the FreeSurfer image analysis suite (V6.0.0, http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/) by computing the averaged distance between the grey/white matter boundary and pial surface at each vertex on the cortical surface. Longitudinal analysis was performed with FreeSurfer image analysis and FreeSurfer's longitudinal processing pipeline program (V6.0.0, http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/) for unbiased subject-specific T1 MRI scans for each subject [45,46,47]. After several imaging processing steps (skull stripping, Talairach transformation, atlas registration, spherical surface maps and parcellations) based on the subject-specific templates, the cerebral cortex was parcellated into 68 distinct anatomical regions, the averaged thickness was determined, and each subject-specific map was visually analysed before further analysing steps .
Paired t-test was used to identify the differences in clinical parameters between time points, and one-way ANOVA was used to find the shifts between CMA and placebo groups at each time point. Cohen’s d effect size was estimated by R package “effsize” and paired parameter (paired = TRUE) was used when we compared difference between visits. For the analysis of plasma metabolomics, we removed the metabolite profiles with more than 50% missing values across all samples. Metabolite changes between time points were analysed by paired t-test. Metabolite changes between CMA and placebo groups were analysed by one-way ANOVA. Missing values were removed in pairwise comparison. The P values were adjusted by Benjamini & Hochberg method. Metabolites with a false-discovery rate of 5% were considered statistically significant.
For analysis of plasma proteomics, we removed the protein profiles with more than 50% missing values across all samples. A paired t-test was used to identify the changes between time points, and one-way ANOVA was used to determine the changes between different groups. P < 0.01 was considered statistically significant. Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyse the association between CMA and clinical parameters or metabolomics or proteomics.
For structural MRI analysis, we performed a Wilcoxon test on the hippocampal volume change post- vs pre-administration to show the treatment effect. We carried out a comprehensive analysis, focusing on identifying significant interactions in the following areas: pre- and post-treatment group differences and time effects (pre- and post-treatment differences adjusted for active and placebo groups) as previously defined by Clarkson et al. 2018 . By using longitudinal analysis paradigm, we created GLM design matrix for active and placebo groups consisting of (a) CMA and placebo patients at day 0 and day 84 images, (b) baseline of day 0 and day 84 combined image and (c) time difference (year). Similarly, for cortical thickness analysis, the symmetrised percent change (spc) was used as the rate concerning the average thickness: spc = rate / avg . We used positive and negative Monte Carlo simulation with the threshold of 1.3 to define areas with significantly changed thickness (P < 0.05).
Generation of multi-omics network
A multi-omics correlation network was generated based on all patients' clinical parameters, serum chemistry, metabolomics, and proteomics data, following the multi-omics network generation pipeline from iNetModels . Spearman correlations between analytes were calculated using the SciPy package in Python 3.7. Missing values were removed pairwisely by setting the “nan_policy” variable to “omit”. Significant correlations (FDR < 5%) were kept and used to link analytes from the same and different omics. The downstream analysis, i.e., centrality analysis, was performed using the degree centrality calculation in iGraph Python package in Python 3.7.
CMA improves cognition and clinical parameters in AD patients
To test the effect of CMA in AD patients, we performed a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study and screened 89 adults diagnosed with AD. We recruited 69 patients older than 50 years with mild to moderate AD according to ADAS-Cog (ADAS ≥ 12) and CDR-SOB (CDR ≤ 2) between February 1 and October 1, 2020. Of the 69 patients, 47 were randomly assigned to the CMA group and 22 to the placebo group, and they completed visit 2 after 28 days. Nine patients (7 in CMA, 2 in placebo groups) dropped out from the study before the day-84 visit due to the COVID-19 lockdown. At the end, 60 patients (40 patients in the CMA group and 20 patients in the placebo group) completed visit 3 on day 84 (Fig. 1a, Additional file 3: Fig. S1). We assessed the clinical variables on days 0, 28 and 84, and analysed the differences between the CMA and placebo groups (Additional file 1: Dataset S1 and Additional file 4: Dataset S2).
The patients' mean age in the study was 70.8 years (56–86 years), and 52.1% were men (Table 1, Additional file 1: Dataset S1). The mean ADAS-Cog score was 22.88 (± 10.51) for CMA and 26.28 (± 17.35) for placebo (Table 1, Additional file 4: Dataset S2). There was no significant difference at the baseline in these demographic parameters and AD clinical indicators between the CMA and placebo groups (Table 1). The other clinical characteristics were similar between the CMA and placebo groups (Additional file 1: Dataset S1 and Additional file 4: Dataset S2). Regarding safety, no severe adverse events occurred, and 5 of the patients (7.2%) reported adverse events. All decided to complete the study (Table 2).
We measured clinical variables in all patients and analysed the differences before and after administration in the active and placebo groups (Fig. 1b, Table 3, Additional file 4: Dataset S2). The ADAS-Cog score was significantly decreased on day 28 vs day 0 (Log2FoldChange [FC] = − 0.33, 26% improvement, P = 0.0000003, effect size = − 0.43, 95% CI = [− 0.59, − 0.29]) and further decreased on day 84 vs day 0 (Log2FC = − 0.37, 29% improvement, P = 0.00001, effect size = − 0.50, 95% CI = [− 0.71, − 0.29]) in the CMA group, indicating improved cognitive function in AD patients. A slight but significant improvement was also found in the placebo group on day 28 vs day 0 (Log2FC = − 0.16, 12% improvement, P = 0.009, effect size = − 0.16, 95% CI = [− 0.27, − 0.05]) and day 84 vs day 0 (Log2FC = − 0.19, 14% improvement, P = 0.001, effect size = − 0.23, 95% CI = [− 0.35, − 0.11]). There was no significant difference between groups on days 28 and 84. This could be related to the placebo effect, which is apparent in early stages of AD clinical trials showing relatively unchanged response or even improvement that may continue for up to 12 months, followed by natural disease progression overtime when the drug effect becomes more prominent while the placebo response decreases .
We also analysed the differences in clinical parameters by stratifying the patients into low-score (ADAS-Cog score ≤ 20, n = 39) and high-score (ADAS-Cog score > 20, n = 30) ADAS-Cog groups. We found a significant difference (Log2FC = − 0.77, P = 0.0073, effect size = − 1.23, 95% CI = [− 0.3, − 2.17]) between the CMA and placebo groups in patients with higher ADAS-Cog scores on day 84 (Fig. 1b, Additional file 4: Dataset S2). Moreover, we found a significant improvement of ADAS-Cog score on day 28 vs day 0 (Log2FC = − 0.31, 24% improvement, P = 0.002, effect size = − 0.48, 95% CI = [− 0.76, − 0.2]) and on day 84 vs day 0 (Log2FC = − 0.38, 30% improvement, P = 0.003, effect size = − 0.59, 95% CI = [− 0.97, − 0.21]) in the high-score CMA group and no significant difference in the high-score placebo group at both time points (Fig. 1b, Additional file 4: Dataset S2). We observed a significant difference in the baseline value distribution and mean of ADAS-Cog scores between the severe (ADAS-Cog > 20) CMA and placebo groups (Fig. 1b) due to the randomisation of the subjects. To verify our results, we randomly selected 10 patients from the CMA group with matched ADAS-Cog values to the placebo group (P-value: 0.693) (Fig. 1c), and found significant improvement in the CMA group but no significant difference in the placebo group. Our results indicated that the severe AD patients with high ADAS-Cog scores are more responsive to CMA administration.
Other primary endpoints were ADCS-ADL and MMSE. No significant difference was found between time points or between groups in ADCS-ADL (Fig. 1b, Table 3, Additional file 4: Dataset S2). For MMSE, a significant difference was seen in the placebo group for comparison of day 28 and day 84 vs day 0 (P = 0.04 and 0.02, respectively) as well as in the CMA group when comparing day 28 to day 0 (P = 0.02) but not for day 84 vs day 0 (Fig. 1b, Table 3, Additional file 4: Dataset S2). There was no significance in ADCS-ADL and MMSE at any time points or between groups in patients evaluated with MRI (Additional file 4: Dataset S2).
Analysis of secondary outcome variables showed that serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (Log2FC = − 0.38, P = 0.01) and uric acid levels (Log2FC = − 0.19, P = 0.001) were significantly lower on day 84 vs day 0 only in the CMA group (Fig. 1d, Additional file 4: Dataset S2). This reduction was seen both in high- and low-ADAS-Cog score groups. In contrast, we found no significant difference on day 84 vs day 0 in the placebo group (Fig. 1d, Additional file 4: Dataset S2).
We also measured the complete blood count parameters and found that their levels were significantly changed in the CMA group (Fig. 1d, Additional file 4: Dataset S2). We found that the levels of platelets, basophil% and absolute numbers of basophil and neutrophil were significantly lower on day 84 vs day 0 only in the CMA group. In contrast, the levels of monocytes were significantly increased on day 84 vs day 0 in the CMA group (Fig. 1d, Additional file 4: Dataset S2). Hence, our analysis indicated that the administration of CMA improved the clinical parameters in parallel with improved cognitive functions in AD patients.
Blood profile informs response to CMA
Treatment response variability and clinical heterogeneity are well documented in AD in the literature. Here, we noticed interindividual variability in clinical measures in response to CMA administration. Therefore, we hypothesized that some patients would respond better to CMA than others and that clinical measurements could define these subsets.
To determine whether ALT, a marker for liver damage, could indicate a better response to CMA, we stratified the patients into high- and low-ALT groups by the median ALT of all patients on day 0. The patients of the CMA group with low ALT levels achieved a significant improvement on ADAS-Cog score over different time points, while the patients in the placebo group had no improvement. In contrast, the patients in the CMA group with high ALT levels also exhibited an improved (i.e., decreased) ADAS-Cog score, but the degree of change was not as much as the low-ALT patients in the CMA group (Fig. 2a). Moreover, patients in the placebo group with high ALT levels also had improved ADAS-Cog scores. Thus, these results suggest that the patients with low ALT levels are more responsive to CMA.
We further repeated stratification for each blood parameter, and identified high alkaline phosphatase (ALP), low gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), high hematocrit, high HbA1c, high insulin, high uric acid, high basophil count, and high red blood cell count as indicators for better responsiveness to CMA (Fig. 2b, Additional file 5: Fig. S2).
CMA increases the plasma levels of metabolites associated with metabolic activators
We first analysed the plasma levels of serine, carnitine, NR, and cysteine as well as their by-products. The plasma levels of metabolic activators were increased on day 84 vs day 0 in the CMA group (Fig. 3a, Additional file 6: Dataset S3). Moreover, the plasma levels of NR, 1-methylnicotinamide, nicotinurate, N1-methyl-2-pyridone-5-carboxamide and nicotinamide (associated with NR and NAD+ metabolism); serine, glycine and sarcosine (associated with serine and glycine metabolism); as well as deoxycarnitine and carnitine (associated with carnitine metabolism) in the CMA group were significantly higher on day 84 compared to day 0 (Fig. 3b–d, Additional file 6: Dataset S3).
Next, we investigated the relationship between the plasma level of administered metabolic activators and other metabolites. We analysed 195 of the plasma metabolites most significantly correlated with serine, L-carnitine, NR, and cysteine (Additional file 7: Dataset S4). We found two clusters of metabolites that are significantly correlated with cysteine only or together with serine, carnitine and NR (Fig. 4a). We observed that cysteine had different plasma changes than the other three metabolic activators, as reported in previous clinical trials [38, 51].
Effect of CMA on global metabolism
We identified the significantly (FDR < 0.05) different plasma metabolites on day 84 vs day 0 and found that the plasma levels of 132 metabolites were significantly different in the CMA group (Fig. 3, Additional file 6: Dataset S3). Evaluation of plasma metabolites that differed significantly on day 84 vs day 0 in each group showed that a larger number of metabolites related to amino acid metabolism (n = 53), lipid metabolism (n = 42) and other metabolic pathways (n = 37) were altered in the CMA group compared to the placebo group (Fig. 3, Additional file 6: Dataset S3).
N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) is one of the most abundant brain metabolites, and its reduced plasma levels are associated with brain tissue damage. Previous research has revealed the importance of NAA in maintaining energy metabolism in the central nervous system . Here, we observed that the plasma levels of NAA significantly increased on day 84 vs day 0 in the CMA group (Fig. 3b, Additional file 6: Dataset S3). Another upregulated metabolite on day 84 vs day 0 in the CMA group was sarcosine (a derivative of glycine), which has been widely studied for its effect to improve cognitive symptoms through different pharmacological activities in neurons . Of note, quinolinic acid (an endogenous excitotoxin acting on N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors leading to neurotoxic damage) was significantly decreased on day 84 vs day 0 only in the CMA group (Fig. 3b, Additional file 6: Dataset S3).
Increased plasma levels of homocysteine are a known risk factor for AD, and several animal studies have implicated promising effects of methionine restriction [54, 55]. In our clinical trial, plasma levels of S-adenosylhomocysteine, 2,3-dihydroxy-5-methylthio-4-pentenoate and N-acetyl taurine were significantly downregulated on day 84 vs day 0 in the CMA group (Fig. 3b, Additional file 6: Dataset S3). Of note, reductions of these metabolites were significantly correlated with serine and NR supplementation (Fig. 4a, Additional file 7: Dataset S4).
Increased plasma levels of metabolites in the kynurenine pathway are associated with AD severity . In our study, we found that plasma levels of kynurenate and 8-methoxykynurenate were significantly lower on day 84 vs day 0 in the CMA group (Fig. 3b, Additional file 6: Dataset S3). Reduction of the plasma level of kynurenate was positively correlated with plasma serine levels (Additional file 7: Dataset S4). Kynurenate, which has a prooxidant effect, is the product of the tryptophan degradation pathway. It produces superoxide radicals through aerobic irradiation, which lead to cytochrome c reduction . It has been reported that increased levels of kynurenine lead to cell death through the reactive oxygen species pathway in nature killer cells  and lower blood pressure in systemic inflammation .
Emerging evidence indicates a link between abnormal kidney function and AD, but the potential impact of the kidney on cognitive impairment is still undetermined . Recent studies showed that plasma N,N,N-trimethyl-5-aminovalerate is involved in lysine metabolism, and serves as an indicator of elevated urinary albumin excretion . Here, we found that the plasma level of N,N,N-trimethyl-5-aminovalerate was significantly decreased on day 84 vs day 0 in the CMA group (Fig. 3b, Additional file 6: Dataset S3) and significantly inversely correlated with the plasma levels of serine and NR. Moreover, the plasma level of creatinine was also significantly decreased on day 84 vs day 0 in the CMA group (Fig. 3b, Additional file 6: Dataset S3). The decrease of plasma creatinine inversely correlated with the plasma level of serine (Additional file 7: Dataset S4). Additionally, our analysis revealed decreased levels of several metabolites belonging to histidine metabolism in the CMA group on day 84 vs day 0. Among those, N-acetyl-1-methylhistidine is associated with chronic kidney disease and showed a significant negative correlation with serine supplementation (Fig. 3b, Additional file 7: Dataset S4). Also, plasma levels of metabolites related to the urea cycle (3-amino-2-piperidone, arginine, homoarginine, N-alpha-acetylornithine, ornithine and pro-hydroxy-pro) were significantly decreased in the CMA group on day 84 vs day 0 (Fig. 3b, Additional file 6: Dataset S3) and inversely correlated with the plasma levels of serine and NR (Additional file 7: Dataset S4).
Lipids play a fundamental role in the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases, including AD. Specific lipid species of cellular membranes (e.g., cholesterol and sphingolipids) are structural components of cell membrane and regulate many critical aspects of brain function . In our study, plasma levels of many metabolites associated with sphingomyelins and fatty acid metabolism (acyl carnitines) were significantly increased on day 84 vs day 0 in the CMA group (Fig. 3c, Additional file 6: Dataset S3). Interestingly, plasma levels of pregnenolone steroids and 2R,3R-dihydroxybutyrate were significantly decreased on day 84 vs day 0 (Fig. 3c, Additional file 6: Dataset S3). These alterations were significantly positively correlated with carnitine and serine levels (Additional file 7: Dataset S4).
Effect of CMA on plasma proteins
Plasma levels of 1466 protein markers were measured with the plasma proteome profiling platform Proximity Extension Assay. After quality control and exclusion of proteins with missing values in more than 50% of samples, 1463 proteins were analysed. Proteins whose levels differed significantly between visits in the CMA and placebo groups are listed in Additional file 8: Dataset S5.
We found that 22 proteins were significantly (P < 0.01) different in the CMA group on day 84 vs day 0. Nineteen of these proteins were significantly decreased, whereas 3 were significantly increased on day 84 vs day 0. After filtering out the proteins based on log2FC, we found that the plasma levels of persephin (PSPN), oncostatin-M (OSM), PADI4 (protein-arginine deiminase type-4), PDGFC (platelet-derived growth factor C), SCGN (secretagogin), LTBP3 (latent-transforming growth factor beta-binding protein 3), CLEC4G (C-type lectin domain family 4 member G), Mer tyrosine kinase (MertK), WNT9A (protein Wnt-9a), isthmin-1, ASAH2 (neutral ceramidase), CES3 (carboxylesterase-3), HPGDS (hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase), pro-neuropeptide Y, thrombopoietin, SIGLEC6 (sialic acid-binding Ig-like lectin-6), GDNF (glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor), PADI2 (protein-arginine deiminase type-2) and epidermal growth factor-like protein 7 (EGFL7) were significantly downregulated, while KLB (beta-klotho), BGN (biglycan), and CMP-N-acetylneuraminate-beta-galactosamide-alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase-1 (ST3GAL1) were significantly upregulated on day 84 vs day 0 in the CMA group (Fig. 4b, Additional file 8: Dataset S5). Only one protein was significantly (P < 0.01) altered in the placebo group (EGFL7, upregulated).
Integrative multi-omics analysis
Multi-omics data integration can provide novel insights and a more holistic view of the human body in both health and disease states . In this study, we generated an integrative multi-omics network using metabolomics and proteomics data, coupled with detailed clinical variables, to understand the functional relationships between analytes from the same and different omics data types. We generated the network using the method used in iNetModels , to which we also deposited our network. The network consists of 937,282 edges from 2273 nodes (36.3% network density, Additional file 9: Dataset S6).
We extracted a sub-network to highlight the interactions between the individual metabolic activators, cognitive function (ADAS-Cog scores), two highlighted proteins (OSM and PSPN), and their top neighbours (Fig. 4c). From the sub-network, ADAS-Cog was negatively associated with carnitine (and its derivatives) and nicotinamide-associated metabolites, whereas the metabolic activators were negatively associated with fatty acid and histidine metabolism. Finally, OSM and PSPN were positively associated with immune- and cell cycle-related proteins.
Subsequently, we performed centrality analysis to identify the most central analytes in the networks. The top 20 most central metabolites were dominated by amino acid metabolites (tryptophan, glutamate, and branched-chain amino acid metabolism) and lipid metabolites (androgenic steroid pathway), and the top proteins were related to, among others, short- and long-term memory (calbindin), lipid metabolism (PLA2G10 [group 10 secretory phospholipase-A2]), and immune response (SELPLG [selectin-P glycoprotein ligand 1], CLEC4D [C-type lectin domain family 4 member E], and galectin-7).
Furthermore, we performed community analysis within the network using the Leiden algorithm. We discovered 3 modules that showed significant interaction among the members. In cluster-0, the biggest cluster, the top nodes were related to tryptophan metabolism (indole acetate), fatty acid metabolism (3-hydroxyoctanoate), and steroid metabolism (11-ketoetiocholanolone glucuronide and 11-beta-hydroxyetiocholanolone glucuronide). Moreover, we found 2 top proteins in the same cluster, alpha-actin-2 and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1, associated with AD [63, 64]. In cluster-1, the top nodes were associated with leucine metabolism (3-hydroxy-2-ethylpropionate), ceramide phosphatidylethanolamine, and a carnitine metabolite (erucoylcarnitine); meanwhile, the central nodes of cluster-2 were related to methionine metabolism and aminosugar metabolism (N-acetylglucosamine/N-acetylgalactosamine). These results showed that the integrative multi-omics network analysis could be used to strengthen the results from single omics analyses and identify key analytes associated with AD. Moreover, it provided new insights by elucidating the functional relationships within and between different omics data.
In evaluating the correlations between each activators (used in the present study for therapeutic purposes) and clinical, metabolic, and proteomic parameters, we identified significant correlations of serine, carnitine, cysteine, and nicotinamide levels with improved peripheral blood parameters, such as liver function, complete blood count (CBC), and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), which are relevant to the pathogenesis of AD. Accordingly, improved ADAS-Cog scores were also associated with serum serine and carnitine changes, which fit well with their well-known pro-cognitive and energy-boosting effects. Similar results were also observed for metabolomic and proteomic data. The majority of the activators exhibited significant correlations with improved metabolites and proteins (either increased or decreased) relative to a slower degeneration process in AD. It is worth mentioning here that two of the proteins, OSM and PSPN, most strongly associated with other beneficial protein metabolites, were also related to critical alterations of several amino acids, such as spermidine and hypotaurine, which may suggest a metabolic shift from the protein to the amino acid metabolism to compensate for the energy deficit reported in AD.
Effect of CMA on hippocampal volumes and cortical thickness
The baseline demographics and improved clinical parameters of the MRI group significantly aligned with the entire patient cohort (Additional file 1: Dataset S1, Additional file 4: Dataset S2). According to the longitudinal cortical thickness analysis, the active group showed statistically significant alterations in the bilateral occipital, bilateral rostral middle frontal, left inferior parietal, and left paracentral regions compared to the placebo group (Fig. 5a). Additionally, we evaluated the sub-anatomic hippocampal regions shown in Fig. 5b. By comparing the differences between pre- and post-treatment groups in each treatment arm, our results showed that the left whole hippocampal mean volume (expressed as the average volume of the hippocampal body and the hippocampal head) and the volume of left molecular layer of the hippocampal body were maintained after the CMA treatment; however, they were significantly reduced in the placebo group (P < 0.05, Fig. 5c, Additional file 10: Dataset S7). Other sub-anatomic hippocampal regions (left CA1 body and left whole hippocampal body) were not significant between drug and placebo but near a statistically significant level (P = 0.055 and P = 0.052, respectively, Additional file 10: Dataset S7).
Our results suggested that oral administration of CMA for 84 days has a considerable effect on cognitive function in AD patients based on ADAS-Cog scores. The cognitive functions in patients with high ADAS-Cog scores were improved in the CMA group while there were no significant differences in the placebo group. We also showed beneficial effects in both severe and mild patients. Cognitive functions of AD patients were improved by 29% in the CMA group, whereas they were improved only by 14% in the placebo group after 84 days, consistent with a placebo effect that is seen in other AD clinical trials [50, 65, 66]. The improvement of cognitive function was supported by positive alterations in cortical thickness and maintenance of the hippocampal subfield volumes in the CMA group, while no cortical thickness difference but significant volume decline was found in the placebo group. Our finding of a possible beneficial effect in severe AD is of particular value since severe AD patients lack current therapeutic regimes, except for palliative support. Apart from clinical severity, we observed that various clinical variables were also related to the treatment response. For example, patients with low ALT and increased metabolic load (i.e., increased HbA1c and insulin levels) or impaired CBC values responded better to CMA treatment.
The effect of oral administration of CMA was substantiated with a comprehensive analysis of proteins and metabolites in the plasma of patients using a multi-omics analytical platform. The clinical results were consistent with the genome-scale metabolic modelling of more than 600 AD patients showing clear evidence of mitochondrial dysfunction . It is also consistent with the results from an animal model demonstrating improvement in AD-associated histological parameters in animals treated with oral administration of CMA . Thus, the present study suggests a promising therapeutic regime that might help to improve metabolic alterations in AD patients.
Considering the role of hippocampal and frontoparietal degeneration in AD pathogenesis, our neuroimaging observation of improved hippocampal subfield volumes and cortical thickness after metabolic stimulation was not surprising. Herein, we observed significantly improved hippocampal volumes as well as frontal and parietal cortical thickness in the CMA group, whereas no positive effects were observed in the placebo group. Our results suggested a treatment effect in the CMA group in major cognitive brain regions in AD.
Numerous studies in healthy participants have suggested that metabolism and cognitive brain network organization are strongly linked [68, 69]. This is especially true for higher-order cognitive tasks, which are the most metabolically demanding for the brain, and "burn out" would make the brain prone to neurodegenerative and age-related alterations marked by neuronal metabolic dysfunction . Metabolic cofactors improve mitochondrial metabolism by a three-step strategy: (1) L-carnitine to enhance the transport of fatty acids across the mitochondrial membrane, (2) the NAD+ precursor nicotinamide riboside to enhance the β-oxidation of fatty acids in mitochondria, and (3) GSH precursors including serine and NAC to form GSH that is required to protect liver against oxidative stress mediated by free radicals, which are generated through increased β-oxidation of fatty acids in the mitochondria. Thus, our results of the pro-cognitive benefits of CMA may be connected to the metabolic load of cognitive networks and their responsiveness to such metabolic interventions.
Growing data indicate that significant mitochondrial dysfunction occurs in AD pathogenesis . In our previous studies, we reported that CMA administration effectively facilitates fatty acid oxidation in the mitochondria and alleviates oxidative stress by de novo GSH synthesis [34,35,36,37,38,39]. However, how these beneficial effects contribute to both structural and cognitive abnormalities is unknown and needs further evaluation. Based on the current literature, enhancing NAD+ levels may help restore brain energy metabolism and oxidative stress, which are implicated in cognitive decline. Studies in animal models have shown that NAD+ precursors such as NR and NMN can normalize neuroinflammation, improve learning and motor functions, induce mitophagy, and protect against neurological damage [72,73,74,75,76,77]. In parallel, preserving the redox homeostasis in elderly animals has been shown to protect against cognitive decline, potentially through preserving NMDA receptor activation . A recent study reported that astrocytic glycolysis controls cognitive functions through synaptic NMDA receptors and suggested oral L-serine as an accessible therapy for AD patients . Similarly, NAC therapy has been shown to restore NMDA receptor activation and reduce oxidative injury in the hippocampus of PD animal models . While removal of oxidative stress with CMA administration suggests a reasonable biological explanation for the brain hypofunction that accompanies AD-related pathologies, further mechanistic studies should be performed.
The proteomic analysis in this study revealed significant alterations of levels of several critical proteins that play an essential role in the pathogenesis of AD. For instance, levels of MertK [81, 82], EGFR [83, 84], oncostatin [85,86,87,88,89], PAD4 [90, 91], LTGF [92,93,94,95,96], and TPO , known as a potent inducer of neuro-inflammation, amyloid production and apoptosis, were significantly decreased. In contrast, proteins with neuroprotective and pro-cognitive properties, such as Klotho [98, 99] and ST3GAL1 , werer increased after CMA treatment. More interestingly, most of the analysed proteins were also shown to be significantly altered in recent human AD studies [92,93,94,95,96, 101,102,103,104,105,106,107]. KlothoB levels were also significantly altered after CMA treatment, consistent with its neuroprotective role as a cofactor and neurotrophic factor. Recent studies have shown that KlothoB indirectly regulates glucose and energy metabolism through F2F1, which is expressed in some regions of the brain and involved in learning and memory . Moreover, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) signalling has also been shown to play a critical role in mediating the detrimental effects of increased dihydroxybutyrate in the progression of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) . Interestingly, we found that the dihydroxybutyrate levels were decreased after treatment based on metabolomic analysis. Although the exact pathways involved in the metabolic generation of DHBA are still far from clear, it has been hypothesized that dihydroxybutyrate levels may be a compensatory response to increased cellular stress secondary to compromise of the Krebs cycle function, creating an alternative energy production pathway in AD . This represents indirect evidence for the energetic regulatory effect of CMA. Our findings are also in agreement with a recent study by Johnson et al., which evaluated > 2000 brains and nearly 400 cerebrospinal fluid samples by quantitative proteomics and identified mitochondrial metabolism as one of the most affected six metabolic pathways showing a strong correlation with the overall cognitive and pathological changes in AD . Hence, we observed that the significantly improved proteins related to mitochondrial bioenergetic mechanisms and the neuroinflammatory process were associated with increased cognitive scores and preserved hippocampal volumes after CMA treatment.
The metabolomics data were consistent with the expected biological outcomes of CMA treatment. Levels of plasma nicotinamide and related metabolites were increased, suggesting that NR provides sufficient substrate for mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation. In addition to its role as a cellular metabolite, NAD+ functions as an essential cofactor for the DNA repair protein poly (ADP ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) . Hyperactivation of PARP1 and decreased NAD+ have already been identified in the brains of patients with AD [111, 112]. Plasma levels of serine were also increased, suggesting that CMA treatment improves the serine deficiency associated with AD. For instance, a recent study showed that the adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-reducing effect of glucose hypometabolism is restored with oral serine supplementation, suggesting the potential use of oral serine as a ready-to-use therapy for AD . The exact mechanism of action also applies to cysteine. As a GSH precursor, cysteine acts as an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent, maintaining the mitochondrial homeostasis and key neurotransmitter systems, such as glutamate, involved in learning and memory [113, 114]. Accordingly, NAC has been tested for treatment of AD and shown potentials for use as an alternative medication . More importantly, fatty acid oxidation and carnitine metabolism were significantly facilitated, as shown by the robust increase in plasma levels of carnitine. These findings fit well with recent human data showing that severe disturbances in carnitine metabolism frequently occur in individuals with AD, in association with severe mitochondrial dysfunction [116, 117]. Cristofano et al. showed a progressive decrease in carnitine serum levels in individuals shifting from normal status to AD, suggesting that decreased serum concentrations of carnitine may predispose them to AD . In support of this hypothesis, human clinical studies have demonstrated pro-cognitive effects of carnitine in MCI and AD [119,120,121].
In addition, the levels of tryptophan metabolites, including kynurenate, kynurenine, and tryptophan betaine, decreased significantly after CMA treatment. Increased levels of these metabolites are associated with increased severity of neurodegeneration and clinical cognitive impairment through a high oxidative load, and with the formation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) [122, 123]. For instance, recent data showed a synergistic relationship between β-amyloid 1–42 and enzymatic activations of the tryptophan kynurenine pathway, resulting in increased oxidative stress, which may be associated with the formation of NFTs and senile plaque development . Also, a recent study revealed that tryptophan-2,3-dioxygenase is highly expressed in the brains of AD patients and co-localised with quinolinic acid, NFTs, and amyloid deposits in the hippocampus of post-mortem brains of AD patients .
We also observed significantly increased levels of NAA, sarcosine, methionine, cysteine, and S-adenosylmethionine and decreased levels of histidine, tryptophan quinolate, and urea cycle metabolites, which play a critical role in cognitive functions. For instance, increased NAA may provide an additional energy source for intercellular metabolite trafficking during the neurodegenerative process, especially when glucose metabolism is downregulated . Similarly, increased sarcosine levels may boost cognition, as previously shown in patients with schizophrenia, a disease in which oxidative damage and impaired glucose metabolism play key roles . In addition, decreased histidine metabolism and other decreased markers, such as homocysteine and S-adenosylhomocysteine found in our treatment group, have been shown to slow the cognitive ageing process when appropriately downregulated . For instance, increased plasma homocysteine levels are a known risk factor for AD, whereas a low-leucine and low-arginine diet yields beneficial effects on cognition .
Interestingly, CMA rapidly lowered levels of uric acid and associated metabolites. Uric acid stimulates inflammation either directly or by activating NLRP3 inflammasomes . Although the extent to which uric acid reduction contributed to the regression of cognitive impairment was unclear, the effect may be linked to improved metabolic homeostasis. For instance, a recent clinical study showed increased urea metabolism in AD patients . Accordingly, decreased levels of taurine and urea metabolites are associated with a diminished risk of dementia .
To date, a few studies have identified the global changes in metabolites and metabolic pathways in AD [25, 132, 133]. Among these, some studies highlight that alterations in lipid meabolism also play an essential role in the pathophysiology of AD . In terms of lipid metabolism, significant differences in the levels of some compounds have been observed in AD patients. Despite some discrepant trends in cross-sectional studies examining lipids in AD patients [135, 136], the plasma levels of sphingolipids, sphingomyelins [137, 138], acylcarnitines  and phosphatidylcholines [140,141,142] exhibited statistically lower concentrations in patients with AD, even in the preclinical stages of the disease . In addition, a significant correlation among different lipid metabolites, tau and amyloid pathology, brain atrophy and cognitive decline has been observed in an AD patient study . An autopsy study of frontal cortex metabolites showed that impaired glycerophospholipid metabolism is involved in six central metabolic pathways that are altered in AD . In brief, we observed significantly increased levels of lipid metabolites after CMA treatment, including sphingomyelin, carnitine and carnitine-related by-products, which were previously reported to decrease in patients with AD.
Despite insufficient clinical AD data concerning cholesterol metabolites and dicarboxylic acids (DCAs), we observed significantly lower levels of these metabolites after CMA treatment . Levels of pregnanediol, a metabolite of pregnenolone, and DCAs, end-products of β- or omega oxidation, which were observed as decreased in the present study, were previously reported to be lower in the urine of patients with AD [145, 146]. Considering the neurotoxic role of bile acids, along with the oxidative properties of DCAs, the detection of decreased levels of bile acid metabolites and DCA products in the present study is therefore not surprising. Similarly, allopregnanolone has already been reported to have harmful effects on cognitive functions through GABA signalling . Also, increased bile acid levels have been reported in MCI and AD. In contrast, bile acids strongly inhibit the cysteine catabolic pathway in the preclinical period, resulting in depletion of the free cysteine pool and reduced GSH concentrations .
The study has limitations. One limitation of the study was the small sample size after classifying the patients into low- and high-ADAS-Cog score groups. Therefore, a clinical trial with a larger sample size is necessary to elucidate the effects of CMA on functional and structural brain alterations. Moreover, in future studies, mitochondrial functions and changes of beta-amyloid 1–42, total-tau, and phosphorylated-tau concentrations after CMA administration should be analysed. Another limitation of the study was the lack of ApoE genotyping. Such evaluation would be informative for the detection of risk variants for AD patients.
The present phase 2 clinical study suggested that oral administration of CMA improves metabolic alterations in AD patients, and that CMA is safe and well-tolerated, with no major safety concerns identified. The safety profile of metabolic activators in AD patients is consistent with the results of our previous one-day calibration study and phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. Importantly, our findings indicated that CMA has positive effects on cognitive functions and markers of metabolic abnormalities, especially in patients with severe AD. Of note, our results should be interpreted with caution until being confirmed by a randomized, double-blinded and placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial.
Availability of data and materials
The data supporting the findings of this study are available in Supplementary Material. Raw data are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale
Alzheimer's Disease cooperative study—activities of daily living
Clinical dementia rating scale sum of boxes
Combined metabolic activators
Mini mental state examination
Trujillo-Estrada L, Jimenez S, De Castro V, Torres M, Baglietto-Vargas D, Moreno-Gonzalez I, et al. In vivo modification of Abeta plaque toxicity as a novel neuroprotective lithium-mediated therapy for Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2013;1:73.
Nunomura A, Perry G. RNA and oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s disease: focus on microRNAs. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020;2020:2638130.
Lam S, Bayraktar A, Zhang C, Turkez H, Nielsen J, Boren J, et al. A systems biology approach for studying neurodegenerative diseases. Drug Discov Today. 2020;25(7):1146–59.
Mielke JG, Taghibiglou C, Liu L, Zhang Y, Jia Z, Adeli K, et al. A biochemical and functional characterization of diet-induced brain insulin resistance. J Neurochem. 2005;93(6):1568–78.
Arnold SE, Arvanitakis Z, Macauley-Rambach SL, Koenig AM, Wang HY, Ahima RS, et al. Brain insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer disease: concepts and conundrums. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14(3):168–81.
Wei Y, Han C, Wang Y, Wu B, Su T, Liu Y, et al. Ribosylation triggering Alzheimer’s disease-like Tau hyperphosphorylation via activation of CaMKII. Aging Cell. 2015;14(5):754–63.
Masciopinto F, Di Pietro N, Corona C, Bomba M, Pipino C, Curcio M, et al. Effects of long-term treatment with pioglitazone on cognition and glucose metabolism of PS1-KI, 3xTg-AD, and wild-type mice. Cell Death Dis. 2012;3(12):e448.
Wong LR, Wong P, Ho PC. Metabolic profiling of female Tg2576 mouse brains provides novel evidence supporting intranasal low-dose pioglitazone for long-term treatment at an early stage of Alzheimer’s disease. Biomedicines. 2020;8(12):589.
Makin S. The amyloid hypothesis on trial. Nature. 2018;559(7715):S4-s7.
Kuehn BM. In Alzheimer research, glucose metabolism moves to center stage. JAMA. 2020;323(4):297–9.
Chen Z, Zhong C. Decoding Alzheimer’s disease from perturbed cerebral glucose metabolism: implications for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Prog Neurobiol. 2013;108:21–43.
Powell CL, Davidson AR, Brown AM. Universal glia to neurone lactate transfer in the nervous system: physiological functions and pathological consequences. Biosensors. 2020;10(11):183.
Drulis-Fajdasz D, Gizak A, Wójtowicz T, Wiśniewski JR, Rakus D. Aging-associated changes in hippocampal glycogen metabolism in mice. Evidence for and against astrocyte-to-neuron lactate shuttle. Glia. 2018;66(7):1481–95.
Wang W, Zhao F, Ma X, Perry G, Zhu X. Mitochondria dysfunction in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease: recent advances. Mol Neurodegener. 2020;15(1):30.
Sorrentino V, Romani M, Mouchiroud L, Beck JS, Zhang H, D’Amico D, et al. Enhancing mitochondrial proteostasis reduces amyloid-β proteotoxicity. Nature. 2017;552(7684):187–93.
Liang WS, Reiman EM, Valla J, Dunckley T, Beach TG, Grover A, et al. Alzheimer’s disease is associated with reduced expression of energy metabolism genes in posterior cingulate neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(11):4441–6.
Lin MT, Beal MF. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases. Nature. 2006;443(7113):787–95.
Beck SJ, Guo L, Phensy A, Tian J, Wang L, Tandon N, et al. Deregulation of mitochondrial F1FO-ATP synthase via OSCP in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11483.
Kerr JS, Adriaanse BA, Greig NH, Mattson MP, Cader MZ, Bohr VA, et al. Mitophagy and Alzheimer’s disease: cellular and molecular mechanisms. Trends Neurosci. 2017;40(3):151–66.
Xie C, Zhuang X-X, Niu Z, Ai R, Lautrup S, Zheng S, et al. Amelioration of Alzheimer’s disease pathology by mitophagy inducers identified via machine learning and a cross-species workflow. Nat Biomed Eng. 2022;6(1):76–93.
Lautrup S, Sinclair DA, Mattson MP, Fang EF. NAD+ in brain aging and neurodegenerative disorders. Cell Metab. 2019;30(4):630–55.
Liu D, Pitta M, Jiang H, Lee JH, Zhang G, Chen X, et al. Nicotinamide forestalls pathology and cognitive decline in Alzheimer mice: evidence for improved neuronal bioenergetics and autophagy procession. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34(6):1564–80.
Fang EF, Hou Y, Palikaras K, Adriaanse BA, Kerr JS, Yang B, et al. Mitophagy inhibits amyloid-β and tau pathology and reverses cognitive deficits in models of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22(3):401–12.
Cummings J, Lee G, Ritter A, Sabbagh M, Zhong K. Alzheimer’s disease drug development pipeline: 2020. Alzheimers Dement. 2020;6(1): e12050.
Pan X, Nasaruddin MB, Elliott CT, McGuinness B, Passmore AP, Kehoe PG, et al. Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology has transient effects on the brain and blood metabolome. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;38:151–63.
Hou Y, Wei Y, Lautrup S, Yang B, Wang Y, Cordonnier S, et al. NAD(+) supplementation reduces neuroinflammation and cell senescence in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease via cGAS-STING. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118:37.
Toledo JB, Arnold M, Kastenmüller G, Chang R, Baillie RA, Han X, et al. Metabolic network failures in Alzheimer’s disease: a biochemical road map. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13(9):965–84.
Sancesario GM, Bernardini S. Alzheimer’s disease in the omics era. Clin Biochem. 2018;59:9–16.
Jagust W. Imaging the evolution and pathophysiology of Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19(11):687–700.
De Santi S, de Leon MJ, Rusinek H, Convit A, Tarshish CY, Roche A, et al. Hippocampal formation glucose metabolism and volume losses in MCI and AD. Neurobiol Aging. 2001;22(4):529–39.
Nagata T, Shinagawa S, Ochiai Y, Aoki R, Kasahara H, Nukariya K, et al. Association between executive dysfunction and hippocampal volume in Alzheimer’s disease. Int Psychogeriatr. 2011;23(5):764–71.
Foster NL, Chase TN, Fedio P, Patronas NJ, Brooks RA, Di Chiro G. Alzheimer’s disease: focal cortical changes shown by positron emission tomography. Neurology. 1983;33(8):961–5.
Greene SJ, Killiany RJ. Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging I. Subregions of the inferior parietal lobule are affected in the progression to Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2010;31(8):1304–11.
Zhang C, Bjornson E, Arif M, Tebani A, Lovric A, Benfeitas R, et al. The acute effect of metabolic cofactor supplementation: a potential therapeutic strategy against non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Mol Syst Biol. 2020;16(4): e9495.
Mardinoglu A, Ural D, Zeybel M, Yuksel HH, Uhlén M, Borén J. The potential use of metabolic cofactors in treatment of NAFLD. Nutrients. 2019;11(7):1578.
Mardinoglu A, Agren R, Kampf C, Asplund A, Uhlen M, Nielsen J. Genome-scale metabolic modelling of hepatocytes reveals serine deficiency in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3083.
Mardinoglu A, Boren J, Smith U, Uhlen M, Nielsen J. Systems biology in hepatology: approaches and applications. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15(6):365–77.
Altay O, Arif M, Li X, Yang H, Aydın M, Alkurt G, et al. Combined metabolic activators accelerates recovery in mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Adv Sci. 2021;8(17): e2101222.
Mardinoglu A, Wu H, Bjornson E, Zhang C, Hakkarainen A, Rasanen SM, et al. An integrated understanding of the rapid metabolic benefits of a carbohydrate-restricted diet on hepatic steatosis in humans. Cell Metab. 2018;27(3):559–71.
Turkez H, Altay O, Yildirim S, Li X, Yang H, Bayram C, et al. Combined metabolic activators improve metabolic functions in the animal models of neurodegenerative diseases. Life Sci. 2022:121325.
Iglesias JE, Augustinack JC, Nguyen K, Player CM, Player A, Wright M, et al. A computational atlas of the hippocampal formation using ex vivo, ultra-high resolution MRI: application to adaptive segmentation of in vivo MRI. Neuroimage. 2015;115:117–37.
Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI. Cortical surface-based analysis. I Segment Surf Reconstruct Neuroimage. 1999;9(2):179–94.
Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, Albert M, Dieterich M, Haselgrove C, et al. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron. 2002;33(3):341–55.
McHugo M, Talati P, Woodward ND, Armstrong K, Blackford JU, Heckers S. Regionally specific volume deficits along the hippocampal long axis in early and chronic psychosis. Neuroimage Clin. 2018;20:1106–14.
Bernal-Rusiel JL, Greve DN, Reuter M, Fischl B, Sabuncu MR. Statistical analysis of longitudinal neuroimage data with Linear Mixed Effects models. Neuroimage. 2013;66:249–60.
Reuter M, Schmansky NJ, Rosas HD, Fischl B. Within-subject template estimation for unbiased longitudinal image analysis. Neuroimage. 2012;61(4):1402–18.
Gorges M, Kunz MS, Müller HP, Liepelt-Scarfone I, Storch A, Dodel R, et al. Longitudinal brain atrophy distribution in advanced Parkinson’s disease: what makes the difference in “cognitive status” converters? Hum Brain Mapp. 2020;41(6):1416–34.
Clarkson BD, Karim HT, Griffiths DJ, Resnick NM. Functional connectivity of the brain in older women with urgency urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(8):2763–75.
Arif M, Zhang C, Li X, Güngör C, Çakmak B, Arslantürk M, et al. iNetModels 2.0: an interactive visualization and database of multi-omics data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:271–6.
Ito K, Corrigan B, Romero K, Anziano R, Neville J, Stephenson D, et al. Understanding placebo responses in Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials from the literature meta-data and CAMD database. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;37(1):173–83.
Zeybel M, Altay O, Arif M, Li X, Yang H, Fredolini C, et al. Combined metabolic activators therapy ameliorates liver fat in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients. Mol Syst Biol. 2021;17(10): e10459.
Moffett JR, Arun P, Ariyannur PS, Namboodiri AMA. N-Acetylaspartate reductions in brain injury: impact on post-injury neuroenergetics, lipid synthesis, and protein acetylation. Front Neuroenergetics. 2013;5:11.
Singh SP, Singh V. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of adjunctive NMDA receptor modulators in chronic schizophrenia. CNS Drugs. 2011;25(10):859–85.
Chen Y, Guillemin GJ. Kynurenine pathway metabolites in humans: disease and healthy States. Int J Tryptophan Res. 2009;2:1–19.
Tapia-Rojas C, Lindsay CB, Montecinos-Oliva C, Arrazola MS, Retamales RM, Bunout D, et al. Is L-methionine a trigger factor for Alzheimer’s-like neurodegeneration?: Changes in Aβ oligomers, tau phosphorylation, synaptic proteins, Wnt signaling and behavioral impairment in wild-type mice. Mol Neurodegener. 2015;10:62.
Wang Q, Liu D, Song P, Zou M-H. Tryptophan-kynurenine pathway is dysregulated in inflammation, and immune activation. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2015;20:1116–43.
Sas K, Szabó E, Vécsei L. Mitochondria, oxidative stress and the kynurenine system, with a focus on ageing and neuroprotection. Molecules. 2018;23(1):191.
Fazio F, Carrizzo A, Lionetto L, Damato A, Capocci L, Ambrosio M, et al. Vasorelaxing action of the kynurenine metabolite, xanthurenic acid: the missing link in endotoxin-induced hypotension? Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:214.
Shi Y, Liu Z, Shen Y, Zhu H. A novel perspective linkage between kidney function and Alzheimer’s disease. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:384.
Haukka JK, Sandholm N, Forsblom C, Cobb JE, Groop P-H, Ferrannini E. Metabolomic profile predicts development of microalbuminuria in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):13853.
Mielke MM, Haughey NJ, Bandaru VVR, Weinberg DD, Darby E, Zaidi N, et al. Plasma sphingomyelins are associated with cognitive progression in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;27(2):259–69.
Hasin Y, Seldin M, Lusis A. Multi-omics approaches to disease. Genome Biol. 2017;18(1):83.
Hutter-Schmid B, Humpel C. Alpha-smooth muscle actin mRNA and protein are increased in isolated brain vessel extracts of Alzheimer mice. Pharmacology. 2016;98(5–6):251–60.
Åberg D, Johansson P, Isgaard J, Wallin A, Johansson JO, Andreasson U, et al. Increased cerebrospinal fluid level of insulin-like growth factor-II in male patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;48(3):637–46.
Lidstone SC. Great expectations: the placebo effect in Parkinson’s disease. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2014;225:139–47.
de la Fuente-Fernández R, Ruth TJ, Sossi V, Schulzer M, Calne DB, Stoessl AJ. Expectation and dopamine release: mechanism of the placebo effect in Parkinson’s disease. Science. 2001;293(5532):1164–6.
Turkez H, Altay O, Yildirim S, Li X, Yang H, Bayram C, et al. Combined metabolic activators improve metabolic functions in the animal models of neurodegenerative diseases. Life Sci. 2023;InPress.
Manza P, Wiers CE, Shokri-Kojori E, Kroll D, Feldman D, Schwandt M, et al. Brain network segregation and glucose energy utilization: relevance for age-related differences in cognitive function. Cereb Cortex. 2020;30(11):5930–42.
Braun U, Schäfer A, Walter H, Erk S, Romanczuk-Seiferth N, Haddad L, et al. Dynamic reconfiguration of frontal brain networks during executive cognition in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(37):11678–83.
Błaszczyk JW. Energy metabolism decline in the aging brain-pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders. Metabolites. 2020;10(11):450.
Perez Ortiz JM, Swerdlow RH. Mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease: role in pathogenesis and novel therapeutic opportunities. Br J Pharmacol. 2019;176(18):3489–507.
Fang EF, Lautrup S, Hou Y, Demarest TG, Croteau DL, Mattson MP, et al. NAD(+) in aging: molecular mechanisms and translational implications. Trends Mol Med. 2017;23(10):899–916.
Hou Y, Lautrup S, Cordonnier S, Wang Y, Croteau DL, Zavala E, et al. NAD(+) supplementation normalizes key Alzheimer’s features and DNA damage responses in a new AD mouse model with introduced DNA repair deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(8):E1876–85.
Moutinho M, Puntambekar SS, Tsai AP, Coronel I, Lin PB, Casali BT, et al. The niacin receptor HCAR2 modulates microglial response and limits disease progression in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Transl Med. 2022;14(637):eabl7634.
Hou Y, Wei Y, Lautrup S, Yang B, Wang Y, Cordonnier S, et al. NAD(+) supplementation reduces neuroinflammation and cell senescence in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease via cGAS-STING. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(37): e2011226118.
Schöndorf DC, Ivanyuk D, Baden P, Sanchez-Martinez A, De Cicco S, Yu C, et al. The NAD+ precursor nicotinamide riboside rescues mitochondrial defects and neuronal loss in iPSC and fly models of Parkinson’s disease. Cell Rep. 2018;23(10):2976–88.
Caponio D, Veverová K, Zhang SQ, Shi L, Wong G, Vyhnalek M, Fang EF. Compromised autophagy and mitophagy in brain ageing and Alzheimer’s diseases. Aging Brain. 2022;1(2):100056.
Haxaire C, Turpin FR, Potier B, Kervern M, Sinet PM, Barbanel G, et al. Reversal of age-related oxidative stress prevents hippocampal synaptic plasticity deficits by protecting D-serine-dependent NMDA receptor activation. Aging Cell. 2012;11(2):336–44.
Le Douce J, Maugard M, Veran J, Matos M, Jégo P, Vigneron PA, et al. Impairment of glycolysis-derived l-serine production in astrocytes contributes to cognitive deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Metab. 2020;31(3):503-17.e8.
Gil-Martínez A-L, Cuenca L, Sánchez C, Estrada C, Fernández-Villalba E, Herrero MT. Effect of NAC treatment and physical activity on neuroinflammation in subchronic Parkinsonism; is physical activity essential? J Neuroinflammation. 2018;15(1):328.
Jhang KA, Park JS, Kim HS, Chong YH. Sulforaphane rescues amyloid-β peptide-mediated decrease in MerTK expression through its anti-inflammatory effect in human THP-1 macrophages. J Neuroinflammation. 2018;15(1):75.
Tondo G, Perani D, Comi C. TAM receptor pathways at the crossroads of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. Dis Markers. 2019;2019:2387614.
Chiang HC, Wang L, Xie Z, Yau A, Zhong Y. PI3 kinase signaling is involved in Abeta-induced memory loss in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(15):7060–5.
Wang L, Chiang H-C, Wu W, Liang B, Xie Z, Yao X, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor is a preferred target for treating Amyloid-β–induced memory loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(41):16743.
Owens T, Renno T, Taupin V, Krakowski M. Inflammatory cytokines in the brain: does the CNS shape immune responses? Immunol Today. 1994;15(12):566–71.
Kordula T, Rydel RE, Brigham EF, Horn F, Heinrich PC, Travis J. Oncostatin M and the interleukin-6 and soluble interleukin-6 receptor complex regulate alpha1-antichymotrypsin expression in human cortical astrocytes. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(7):4112–8.
Castell JV, Gómez-Lechón MJ, David M, Andus T, Geiger T, Trullenque R, et al. Interleukin-6 is the major regulator of acute phase protein synthesis in adult human hepatocytes. FEBS Lett. 1989;242(2):237–9.
Abraham CR, Selkoe DJ, Potter H. Immunochemical identification of the serine protease inhibitor alpha 1-antichymotrypsin in the brain amyloid deposits of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell. 1988;52(4):487–501.
Selkoe DJ. The molecular pathology of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron. 1991;6(4):487–98.
Tu R, Grover HM, Kotra LP. Peptidyl arginine deiminases and neurodegenerative diseases. Curr Med Chem. 2016;23(2):104–14.
Acharya NK, Nagele EP, Han M, Coretti NJ, DeMarshall C, Kosciuk MC, et al. Neuronal PAD4 expression and protein citrullination: possible role in production of autoantibodies associated with neurodegenerative disease. J Autoimmun. 2012;38(4):369–80.
Hamaguchi T, Okino S, Sodeyama N, Itoh Y, Takahashi A, Otomo E, et al. Association of a polymorphism of the transforming growth factor-beta1 gene with cerebral amyloid angiopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76(5):696–9.
Lahiri DK, Ge YW. Role of the APP promoter in Alzheimer’s disease: cell type-specific expression of the beta-amyloid precursor protein. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1030:310–6.
Luedecking EK, DeKosky ST, Mehdi H, Ganguli M, Kamboh MI. Analysis of genetic polymorphisms in the transforming growth factor-beta1 gene and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Hum Genet. 2000;106(5):565–9.
Burton T, Liang B, Dibrov A, Amara F. Transforming growth factor-beta-induced transcription of the Alzheimer beta-amyloid precursor protein gene involves interaction between the CTCF-complex and Smads. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;295(3):713–23.
Lesné S, Docagne F, Gabriel C, Liot G, Lahiri DK, Buée L, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 potentiates amyloid-beta generation in astrocytes and in transgenic mice. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(20):18408–18.
Ehrenreich H, Hasselblatt M, Knerlich F, von Ahsen N, Jacob S, Sperling S, et al. A hematopoietic growth factor, thrombopoietin, has a proapoptotic role in the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(3):862–7.
Woo HG, Chang Y, Ryu DR, Song TJ. Plasma Klotho concentration is associated with the presence, burden and progression of cerebral small vessel disease in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8): e0220796.
Paroni G, Panza F, De Cosmo S, Greco A, Seripa D, Mazzoccoli G. Klotho at the edge of Alzheimer’s disease and senile depression. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56(3):1908–20.
Yang K, Yang Z, Chen X, Li W. The significance of sialylation on the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res Bull. 2021;173:116–23.
Mohri I, Kadoyama K, Kanekiyo T, Sato Y, Kagitani-Shimono K, Saito Y, et al. Hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase and DP1 receptor are selectively upregulated in microglia and astrocytes within senile plaques from human patients and in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2007;66(6):469–80.
Tarkowski E, Issa R, Sjögren M, Wallin A, Blennow K, Tarkowski A, et al. Increased intrathecal levels of the angiogenic factors VEGF and TGF-beta in Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Neurobiol Aging. 2002;23(2):237–43.
Chao CC, Ala TA, Hu S, Crossley KB, Sherman RE, Peterson PK, et al. Serum cytokine levels in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1994;1(4):433–6.
Royall DR, Palmer RF. δ scores predict mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease conversions from nondemented states. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;6:214–21.
Gupta VB, Hone E, Pedrini S, Doecke J, O’Bryant S, James I, et al. Altered levels of blood proteins in Alzheimer’s disease longitudinal study: results from Australian imaging biomarkers lifestyle study of ageing cohort. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;8:60–72.
Taliyan R, Chandran SK, Kakoty V. Therapeutic approaches to Alzheimer’s type of dementia: a focus on FGF21 mediated neuroprotection. Curr Pharm Des. 2019;25(23):2555–68.
Brombo G, Bonetti F, Ortolani B, Morieri ML, Bosi C, Passaro A, et al. Lower plasma Klotho concentrations are associated with vascular dementia but not late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Gerontology. 2018;64(5):414–21.
Salminen A, Jouhten P, Sarajärvi T, Haapasalo A, Hiltunen M. Hypoxia and GABA shunt activation in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurochem Int. 2016;92:13–24.
Johnson ECB, Dammer EB, Duong DM, Ping L, Zhou M, Yin L, et al. Large-scale proteomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease brain and cerebrospinal fluid reveals early changes in energy metabolism associated with microglia and astrocyte activation. Nat Med. 2020;26(5):769–80.
Hou Y, Lautrup S, Cordonnier S, Wang Y, Croteau DL, Zavala E, et al. NAD+ supplementation normalizes key Alzheimer’s features and DNA damage responses in a new AD mouse model with introduced DNA repair deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(8):E1876–85.
Martire S, Fuso A, Mosca L, Forte E, Correani V, Fontana M, et al. Bioenergetic impairment in animal and cellular models of Alzheimer’s disease: PARP-1 inhibition rescues metabolic dysfunctions. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;54(1):307–24.
Martire S, Mosca L, d’Erme M. PARP-1 involvement in neurodegeneration: a focus on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. Mech Ageing Dev. 2015;146–148:53–64.
Bavarsad Shahripour R, Harrigan MR, Alexandrov AV. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in neurological disorders: mechanisms of action and therapeutic opportunities. Brain Behav. 2014;4(2):108–22.
Tardiolo G, Bramanti P, Mazzon E. Overview on the effects of N-acetylcysteine in neurodegenerative diseases. Molecules. 2018;23(12):3305.
Hara Y, McKeehan N, Dacks PA, Fillit HM. Evaluation of the neuroprotective potential of N-acetylcysteine for prevention and treatment of cognitive aging and dementia. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2017;4(3):201–6.
Kepka A, Ochocinska A, Borzym-Kluczyk M, Skorupa E, Stasiewicz-Jarocka B, Chojnowska S, et al. Preventive role of L-carnitine and balanced diet in Alzheimer’s disease. Nutrients. 2020;12(7):1987.
Flanagan JL, Simmons PA, Vehige J, Willcox MD, Garrett Q. Role of carnitine in disease. Nutr Metab. 2010;7:30.
Cristofano A, Sapere N, La Marca G, Angiolillo A, Vitale M, Corbi G, et al. Serum levels of acyl-carnitines along the continuum from normal to Alzheimer’s dementia. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(5): e0155694.
Chen N, Yang M, Zhou M, Xiao J, Guo J, He L. L-carnitine for cognitive enhancement in people without cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3(3):009374.
Wollen KA. Alzheimer’s disease: the pros and cons of pharmaceutical, nutritional, botanical, and stimulatory therapies, with a discussion of treatment strategies from the perspective of patients and practitioners. Altern Med Rev. 2010;15(3):223–44.
Gavrilova SI, Kalyn Ia B, Kolykhalov IV, Roshchina IF, Selezneva ND. Acetyl-L-carnitine (carnicetine) in the treatment of early stages of Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2011;111(9):16–22.
Ting KK, Brew B, Guillemin G. The involvement of astrocytes and kynurenine pathway in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurotox Res. 2007;12(4):247–62.
O’Farrell K, Harkin A. Stress-related regulation of the kynurenine pathway: relevance to neuropsychiatric and degenerative disorders. Neuropharmacology. 2017;112(Pt B):307–23.
Guillemin GJ, Smythe GA, Veas LA, Takikawa O, Brew BJ. A beta 1–42 induces production of quinolinic acid by human macrophages and microglia. NeuroReport. 2003;14(18):2311–5.
Wu W, Nicolazzo JA, Wen L, Chung R, Stankovic R, Bao SS, et al. Expression of tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase and production of kynurenine pathway metabolites in triple transgenic mice and human Alzheimer’s disease brain. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4): e59749.
Bryll A, Skrzypek J, Krzyściak W, Szelągowska M, Śmierciak N, Kozicz T, et al. Oxidative-antioxidant imbalance and impaired glucose metabolism in schizophrenia. Biomolecules. 2020;10(3):384.
Seshadri S, Beiser A, Selhub J, Jacques PF, Rosenberg IH, D’Agostino RB, et al. Plasma homocysteine as a risk factor for dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(7):476–83.
Griffin JWD, Bradshaw PC. Amino acid catabolism in Alzheimer’s disease brain: friend or foe? Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:5472792.
Braga TT, Forni MF, Correa-Costa M, Ramos RN, Barbuto JA, Branco P, et al. Soluble uric acid activates the NLRP3 inflammasome. Sci Rep. 2017;7:39884.
Hansmannel F, Sillaire A, Kamboh MI, Lendon C, Pasquier F, Hannequin D, et al. Is the urea cycle involved in Alzheimer’s disease? J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;21(3):1013–21.
Chouraki V, Preis SR, Yang Q, Beiser A, Li S, Larson MG, et al. Association of amine biomarkers with incident dementia and Alzheimer’s disease in the Framingham study. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13(12):1327–36.
Graham SF, Chevallier OP, Elliott CT, Hölscher C, Johnston J, McGuinness B, et al. Untargeted metabolomic analysis of human plasma indicates differentially affected polyamine and L-arginine metabolism in mild cognitive impairment subjects converting to Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3): e0119452.
Wang G, Zhou Y, Huang FJ, Tang HD, Xu XH, Liu JJ, et al. Plasma metabolite profiles of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. J Proteome Res. 2014;13(5):2649–58.
Chew H, Solomon VA, Fonteh AN. Involvement of lipids in Alzheimer’s disease pathology and potential therapies. Front Physiol. 2020;11:598.
van der Velpen V, Teav T, Gallart-Ayala H, Mehl F, Konz I, Clark C, et al. Systemic and central nervous system metabolic alterations in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019;11(1):93.
Li D, Misialek JR, Boerwinkle E, Gottesman RF, Sharrett AR, Mosley TH, et al. Prospective associations of plasma phospholipids and mild cognitive impairment/dementia among African Americans in the ARIC neurocognitive study. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;6:1–10.
Han X, Rozen S, Boyle SH, Hellegers C, Cheng H, Burke JR, et al. Metabolomics in early Alzheimer’s disease: identification of altered plasma sphingolipidome using shotgun lipidomics. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(7): e21643.
Li D, Misialek JR, Boerwinkle E, Gottesman RF, Sharrett AR, Mosley TH, et al. Plasma phospholipids and prevalence of mild cognitive impairment and/or dementia in the ARIC Neurocognitive study (ARIC-NCS). Alzheimers Dement. 2016;3:73–82.
Ciavardelli D, Piras F, Consalvo A, Rossi C, Zucchelli M, Di Ilio C, et al. Medium-chain plasma acylcarnitines, ketone levels, cognition, and gray matter volumes in healthy elderly, mildly cognitively impaired, or Alzheimer’s disease subjects. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;43:1–12.
Oberacher H, Arnhard K, Linhart C, Diwo A, Marksteiner J, Humpel C. Targeted metabolomic analysis of soluble lysates from platelets of patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease compared to healthy controls: is PC aeC40:4 a promising diagnostic tool? J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;57(2):493–504.
Simpson BN, Kim M, Chuang YF, Beason-Held L, Kitner-Triolo M, Kraut M, et al. Blood metabolite markers of cognitive performance and brain function in aging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2016;36(7):1212–23.
Whiley L, Sen A, Heaton J, Proitsi P, García-Gómez D, Leung R, et al. Evidence of altered phosphatidylcholine metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35(2):271–8.
Paglia G, Stocchero M, Cacciatore S, Lai S, Angel P, Alam MT, et al. Unbiased metabolomic investigation of Alzheimer’s disease brain points to dysregulation of mitochondrial aspartate metabolism. J Proteome Res. 2016;15(2):608–18.
Castor KJ, Shenoi S, Edminster SP, Tran T, King KS, Chui H, et al. Urine dicarboxylic acids change in pre-symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease and reflect loss of energy capacity and hippocampal volume. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(4): e0231765.
Kurbatova N, Garg M, Whiley L, Chekmeneva E, Jiménez B, Gómez-Romero M, et al. Urinary metabolic phenotyping for Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Reports. 2020;10(1):21745.
Passi S, Picardo M, De Luca C, Nazzaro-Porro M, Rossi L, Rotilio G Saturated dicarboxylic acids as products of unsaturated fatty acid oxidation. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Lipids Lipid Metabolism 1993;1168(2):190–8.
Birzniece V, Bäckström T, Johansson IM, Lindblad C, Lundgren P, Löfgren M, et al. Neuroactive steroid effects on cognitive functions with a focus on the serotonin and GABA systems. Brain Res Rev. 2006;51(2):212–39.
Wang Y, Li J, Matye D, Zhang Y, Dennis K, Ding WX, et al. Bile acids regulate cysteine catabolism and glutathione regeneration to modulate hepatic sensitivity to oxidative injury. JCI Insight. 2018;3(8): e99676.
The authors would like to thank Metabolon Inc. (Durham, USA) for the generation of metabolomics data and ChromaDex Inc. (Irvine, CA, USA) for providing nicotinamide riboside. AM and HY acknowledge support from the PoLiMeR Innovative Training Network (Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 812616), which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme. The computations were performed on resources provided by SNIC through Uppsala Multidisciplinary Center for Advanced Computational Science (UPPMAX) under Project sllstore2017024.
Open access funding provided by Royal Institute of Technology. This work was financially supported by ScandiBio Therapeutics and Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (72110).
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before initiating any trial-related procedures. The trial was conducted following Good Clinical Practice guidelines and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The ethics committee approved the study of Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey (Date:22.01.2020, Decision No: 7), and registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ with Clinical Trial ID: NCT04044131.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent for publication was obtained from all participants before initiating any trial-related procedures.
AM, JB and MU are the founder and shareholders of ScandiBio Therapeutics. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Collection of samples of CMA and placebo groups and the measured values of clinical indicators before and after treatment.
Consort flow diagram. Diagram shows the progress through the phases of the parallel randomisation of drug and placebo groups.
Statistical analysis of clinical indicators between different visits or groups.
Interindividual variability in clinical measures in responses to CMA administration.
Plasma metabolomics data for each patient before and after treatment and statistical analysis of plasma metabolites between different visits or groups.
The association between the plasma level of the four supplements serine, carnitine, cysteine and nicotinamide riboside with the plasma levels of other metabolites.
Plasma proteomics data were generated with the Olink cardiometabolic, inflammation, neurology and oncology panels for each patient before and after treatment and statistical analysis of plasma proteins between different visits or groups.
Multi-Omics Network Data, including edges and nodes information. The network is presented in the iNetModels (http://inetmodels.com).
Structural magnetic resonance imaging analysis results
About this article
Cite this article
Yulug, B., Altay, O., Li, X. et al. Combined metabolic activators improve cognitive functions in Alzheimer’s disease patients: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase-II trial. Transl Neurodegener 12, 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40035-023-00336-2