Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Exercise-induced increase in brain-derived neurotrophic factor in human Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Mark A. Hirsch1Email author,
  • Erwin E. H. van Wegen2,
  • Mark A. Newman1 and
  • Patricia C. Heyn3
Translational Neurodegeneration20187:7

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40035-018-0112-1

Received: 3 January 2018

Accepted: 28 February 2018

Published: 20 March 2018

Abstract

Background

Animal models of exercise and Parkinson’s disease (PD) have found that the physiologic use of exercise may interact with the neurodegenerative disease process, likely mediated by brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). No reviews so far have assessed the methodologic quality of available intervention studies or have bundled the effect sizes of individual studies on exercise-induced effects on BDNF blood levels in human PD.

Research design and methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and PubMed from inception to June 2017.

Results

Data aggregated from two randomized controlled trials and four pre-experimental studies with a total of 100 ambulatory patients with idiopathic PD (Hoehn/Yahr ≤3) found improvements in BDNF blood concentration levels in all 6 studies (two RCTs and 4 pre-experimental studies). Pooled BDNF level change scores from the 2 RCTs resulted in a significant homogeneous summary effect size (Standardized Mean Difference 2.06, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.76), and a significant heterogeneous SES for the motor part of the UPDRS-III examination (MD -5.53, 95% CI -10.42 to -0.64). Clinical improvements were noted in all studies using a variety of outcome measures.

Limitations

The evidence-base consists primarily of small studies with low to moderate methodological quality.

Conclusions

This review provides preliminary evidence for the effectiveness of physical exercise treatments for persons with PD on BDNF blood levels. Further research is needed.

Keywords

Brain derived neurotrophic factorExerciseRehabilitationSystematic reviewParkinson’s disease

Background

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a complex, chronic, disabling neurodegenerative condition for which there is no cure [1]. The incidence of PD is expected to double in the next 15 years. The motor features of the disease include bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, gait impairment and postural instability. Non-motor features include cognitive impairment, depression, sleep problems, osteoporosis, anxiety, fatigue and constipation. Increasingly, evidence supports efficacy of physical therapy and physical exercise interventions as adjunctive (i.e., helpful) to dopamine replacement therapy for control of motor symptoms and non-motor features, with improved quality of life for people at all stages of PD [29]. The physiologic effects of exercise may impact a number of plasticity-related events in PD brain including synaptogenesis, angiogenesis, and neurogenesis [10, 11].

In rodent PD models, physical exercise was found to interact with the neurodegenerative process [1214], likely mediated by use-dependent expression of endogenous neurotrophic factors [5, 1528]. The scientific evaluation of exercise induced changes in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) concentration is emerging as a key research area in healthy adult populations [2931] and in neurodegenerative populations (e.g., multiple sclerosis [32, 33]) (schizophrenia [34, 35]). Endogenous production of BDNF by voluntary exercise was shown in adult rats [36], and is purported to play a crucial role in neuroplastic effects of rehabilitation interventions of humans with neurodegenerative disease [28, 29, 3740].

The physiologic mechanisms underlying exercise-induced BDNF changes are not well understood in PD but could include long-term potentiation and long-term depression mechanisms [4143]. BDNF and exercise both promote survival and growth of neurons in pars compacta of substantia nigra and recovery of motor behavior [44]. In the 6-hydroxydopamine model of PD and exercise, blocking of BDNF receptors causes enhanced postlesion nigrostriatal dopaminergic cell loss, quantified as a reduction in the expression of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), a rate-limiting enzyme in dopamine biosynthesis [22, 45]. Additionally, BDNF may ameliorate neuronal dysfunction and neurodegeneration by modulating 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+)-induced neurotoxicity [46], pathologic brain mitochondria function [47], or DNA repair by stimulating transcription factors such as CREB (cyclic AMP response element-binding protein) [48].

Recent reports by the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) Evidence-Based Medicine Panel on non-pharmacologic interventions for PD and the European Physiotherapy Guideline Development Group Panel recommended that future studies ought to focus on exercise-induced neuroplasticity in humans with PD [49, 50]. To the best of our knowledge, no reviews so far have assessed the methodologic quality of available intervention studies or have bundled the effect sizes of individual studies on exercise-induced changes in BDNF blood levels in human PD. The objective of this review was to systematically identify and appraise the evidence, methodological quality and clinical outcomes of intervention studies on the effects of physical exercise on endogenous production of BDNF in human PD, to bring such insights into the clinical context of rehabilitation for people living with PD.

Method

Data sources and search strategy

This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [51]. An a priori protocol [52] was adhered to throughout the review process to minimize risk of bias. An electronic literature search was conducted independently by one of the authors (PH) and a research assistant in the following databases: Medline (Ovid), PubMed (NLM), Embase (Embase.com), PsycINFO (Ovid), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PeDro) and the Cochrane library (Wiley). We included the following key words (including MESH): Parkinson’s, Parkinson’s disease AND exercise, exercise training, physical activity, therapy, physical therapy, physical exercise, physical training, exercise-induced, exercise-enhanced AND human, people, person, individual, patient, older, elderly, AND neurotrophic factor, growth factor, brain derived neurotropic factor, neuroplasticity, plasticity, AND trial, intervention, training, treatment OR control, controlled, randomized.

Criteria for inclusion

We exclusively focused on studies evaluating the effects of exercise interventions on brain-derived neurotrophic factor in patients with PD. Studies were accepted when: 1) they used human participants with diagnosis of PD, 2) they used a prospective intervention design with or without a control group, 3) they contained physical exercise training or a physical exercise intervention component, 4) they assessed neurotrophic factor(s), 5) they were written in English, 6) they were published in a peer-reviewed journal. Non-human studies, non-physical exercise trials, grey literature, studies using mixed populations, single case studies, studies not specific to PD, and studies without assessment of neurotrophic factors were excluded. The search was conducted up to June 2017.

Review levels and data extraction

Initial citation screening (MH, PH) was based on reviewing title and abstract (Level 1 Review) of all database search hits. A second round was implemented (Level 2 review) in which three independent reviewers (EvW, MN, MH) analysed the full manuscripts and performed additional reference tracking. A total of 30 papers were imported into a widely used, web-based, production platform system for reviews (www.covidence.org). Disagreements were resolved in a consensus meeting (Fig. 1). Six manuscripts passed onto full data extraction (LEVEL 3 review in covidence.org). Data on study design, sample size and characteristics, exercise dosing, clinical outcome measures and laboratory results) were extracted manually by two independent data abstractors (MH, MN) and summarized in Table 1. Authors of relevant publications were contacted for data when post intervention means and/or SDs were not reported. When two or more randomized clinical trials were available reporting on the same outcomes, quantitative meta-analysis (i.e., pooling using Hedges’ g) of the findings was performed using Cochrane methodology, in Review Manager 5.3 [53].
Fig. 1

PRISMA flow diagram

Table 1

Exercise-induced BDNF response in human PD and clinical outcome

Author Country Year [PMID]

N Age PD characteristics setting

Outcome measures

Protocol

Results

Pre to post exercise BDNF level mean±SD and BDNF Effect Size

Clinical measures score and UPDRS Effect Size

Sajatovic

USA

2017 [28579759]

28

Exp=69.8±9.3 yrs

Con=70.3±6.5

H&Y ≤3

6.8±5.3 yrs since diagnosis OR

pBDNF

MADRS

MoCA

UPDRS III SCOPA

Interval high-cadence cycling 3 sessions per week for 45-60 minutes each session for 12 weeks. High cadence interval stationary cycling (20 min) at 60-80% Hear Rate maximum.

Resistance training 2-4 sets of 8-12 repetitions for each set.

Self-management exercise 3 times per week (SGE) and psychoeducation (12 60 minute group sessions).

T0 (baseline) 26.8±15.6 pg/mL

T1 (12 weeks, post test) 90±166.4 pg/mL

T2 (24 weeks) 38.5±46.2 pg/mL

335.8% ↑ pBDNF level at T1 (12 weeks, post-test, p<0.001)

MADRS at T0 21.2±6.3

MADRS at T1 15.2±8.0

Δ28.3% ↓ MADRS

MADRS at T2 14.2±8.5

Δ33.0% ↓ MADRS

MoCA at T0 23.3±4.1

MoCA at T1 25.2±3.7

Δ7.5% ↑ MoCA

MoCA at T2 25.2±5.1

Δ0% ↑ MoCA

SCOPA-Sleep (night sleep) at T2 12.1±4.1

Δ14.0% ↑ SCOPA-Sleep (night sleep)

MADRS, MoCA, an SCOPA-Sleep (night sleep) (all p<0.01).

Frazzitta Italy 2014 [24213955]

24 Exp=67±5 yrs pf age Con=65.4±4 yrs of age H&Y 1-1.5 8±3.5 yrs since diagnosis

IR

sBDNF

UPDRS III

BBS 6MWT

Physical therapy 15 X 60 minute sessions per week/ 3 sessions per day

Exercise on treadmill, 30 minutes per session, 5 days/week at ≤60% HRR and a maximum speed of 3.5 km/h for 4 weeks

T0 (admission) 21.64±3.4 ng/mL

T1 (10 days) 25.04±7.3 ng/mL

T2 (20 days) 25.79±7.9 ng/mL

T3 (discharge) 24.77±6.4 ng/mL

ES of ΔsBDNF=1.1 (p<0.0001)

12.6% ↑ sBDNF level at T3.

UPDRS III at T0 16.4±3.5

UPDRS III at T3 8.8±3.2

ES of ΔUPDRS III = -3.3

Δ46.3% ↓UPDRS III

UPDRS II at T0 8.14±3.3

UPDRS II at T3 5.50±3.0

Δ32.4% ↓UPDRS II

BBS at T0 48.64±6.1

BBS at T3 54.00±2.4

Δ9.9% ↑BBS

6MWT (m) at T0 383±94

6MWT at T3 477±79

Δ19.7% ↑6MWT distance

ΔUPDRS II, BBS, and 6MWT (all p<0.01).

No statistical association between BDNF levels and clinical measures.

Marusiak Poland 2015 [25510618]

11

71±10 yrs of age

H & Y 1-3 8±4 yrs since diagnosis

OR

sBDNF

UPDRS III Myometry

Exercise using stationary bicycle, 3 x per wk, 60 minutes per session for 8 weeks

34% ↑ sBDNF level at post-test (p<0.05).

No sBDNF level change in healthy controls (p=0.809).

Within Group Effect Size BDNF Serum Level: PD: BDNF T0-T1: 0,95 (CI -2,38-1,58)

CONTROL: BDNF T0-T1: 0,10 (CI -1,22-2,33)

↑ sBDNF level correlated with improvements in PD rigidity (p<0.05).

Between Groups Effect Size: Not applicable because controls are healthy.

Angelucci Italy 2016 [26863448]

9

62.7±6.8 yrs of age

11.78±7.3 yrs since diagnosis

IR

sBDNF

UPDRS II UPDRS III

6MWT

PDQ-39

Physical therapy 3 session/day/5 days per week for 30 days

Exercise on treadmill, 20 minutes per session, 5 days per week at 3.5-4 km/h at ≤60% HRR

Exercise using stationary bicycle at 25-30 km/h

Exercise using Wii system Fit Balance board

T0 (admission) 2171.03±1699.69 pg/mL

T7 (7 days) 3396.78±1359.56 pg/mL

T14 (14 days) 2670.01±1439.64 pg/mL

T21 (21 days) 2387.38±1088.84 pg/mL

T30 (30 days) 2339.31±1666.01 pg/mL

36.09% ↑ sBDNF level T7 (p<0.01).

No statistically significant changes in sBDNF at 14d, 21d, 30d, 90d

Within Group Effect Size BDNF Serum Level: BDNF T0-T7 = 0,84 (CI 0,04-1,96)

BDNF T0-T14 = 0,34 (CI 0,60-1,45)

BDNF T0-T21 = 0,16 (CI 0,55-1,27)

BDNF T0-T30 = 0,11 (CI 0,98-1,28)

BDNF T90 days data is missing.

UPDRS II T0 21.77±3.38

UPDRS II T30 7.55±3.12

Δ65.3% ↓UPDRS II

UPDRS III T0 31.62±10.68

UPDRS III T30 14.44±8.07

Δ24.4% ↓UPDRS III

UPDRS III G&B score T0 6.74±5.21

UPDRS III G&B score T30 2.33±1.32

Δ65.4% ↓UPDRS III G&B score

6MWT (m) T0 252.33±111.81

6MWT T30 374.22±124.62

Δ32.5% ↑6MWT distance

PDQ-39 T0 61.0±23.5

PDQ-39 T30 45.44±21.01

Δ25.5% ↓PDQ-39

(all p<0.01 at T30).

Within Group Effect Size UPDRS-IIl: UPDRS-III T0-T30 = -1,93 (CI -7,20 to -5,05)

Fontanesi Italy & USA 2016 [26253177]

16

71.5±6.8 yrs of age

8.43±4.08 yrs since diagnosis IR

BDNF-TrkB

UPDRS 6MWT

BBS

TUG

PDDS

FOGQ

physical and occupational therapy, 3 session a day, 5 days per week, for 4 weeks

Multimodal exercise (i.e., treadmill with visual and auditory cueing, stationary bicycle, eliptical machine, stabilometric platform).

T1 (30 days) 52.6% ±10.8% ↑ in sBDNF-tyrosine receptor kinase signaling (p<0.001).

No data on BDNF concentration.

UPDRS total score at T0 (baseline) 43.31±11.99

UPDRS total score at T1 29.56±9.46

Δ31.7% ↓UPDRS total score

UPDRS III at T0 19.31±4.71

UPDRS III at T1 13.06±3.28

Δ32.3% ↓UPDRS III

6MWT at T0 292.38±103.46

6MWT at T1 363.63±114.64

Δ20% ↑in 6MWT distance

BBS at T0 44.74±7.21

BBS at T1 52.50±4.18

Δ14.7% ↑BBS score

PDDS at T0 71.13±14.53

PDDS at T1 54.25±12.12

Δ23.7% ↓PDDS score

FOGQ at T0 14.27±5.22

FOGQ at T1 9.73±4.03

Δ31.8% ↓FOGQ score

(all p<0.01)

Within Group Effect Size UPDRS-IIl: UPDRS-III T0-T30 =

-0,63 (CI -5,72 to -2,29)

Zoladz Poland

2014 [24930517]

12 70 ± 3 yrs of age

H&Y 1-3

8.5± 1.3 yrs since diagnosis OR

sBDNF UPDRS

Interval exercise on a stationary bicycle, 3 x 60 minute sessions per week, for 8 weeks.

8 sets of 5 minute intervals including 3-minutes at 80-90 rpm and 2-minutes at less than 60 rpm. Target heart rate to achieve during cycling exercise was calculated as 60-75% of the Maximum Heart Rate.

T0 (baseline) 10977±756 pg/mL

T1 (60 days) 14206±1256 pg/mL

Δ 22.7% ↑ in sBDNF levels in PD (p<0.05).

Within Group Effect Size BDNF Serum Level: BDNF T0-T1 = 3,25 (CI 2,54-3,68)

UPDRS total score at T0 48.9±4.3

UPDRS total score at T1 38.1±3.9

Δ 22% ↓ UPDRS total score (p<0.05).

Within Groups Effect Size UPDRS-III: no data.

Table Note: sBDNF serum brain derived neurotrophic factor, pBDNF plasma brain derived neurotrophic factor, UPDRS Unified Parkinson’s disease Rating Scale, UPDRS part III (motor examination), UPDRS part II (Activities of daily living), UPDRS G&B UPDRS gait and balance score, MADRS Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale, MoCA Montreal Cognitive Assessment, SCOPA Scales for Outcomes in PD – Sleep, BBS Berg Balance Scale, 6MWT six minute walk test, PDQ-39 Parkinson’s disease Quality of Life test 39 questions, d days, wks weeks, yrs years, Exp experimental group, Con control group, H & Y Hoehn and Yahr stage of Parkinson’s disease, IR inpatient rehabilitation, OR outpatient rehabilitation, N sample size, PMID pub med identification number, HRR hear rate reserve, rpm revolutions per minute, km/h kilometers per hour, d days; Moyometry myometric quantification using MyotonPRO myometry (Myoton AS, Tallinn, Estonia), TUG timed-up-and-go test, PDDS Parkinson’s disease disability scale, FOGQ Freezing of Gait Questionnaire, TrkB tyrosine receptor kinase, sVCAM-1 Basal serum soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, TNF-α basal serum tumor necrosis factor, ES effect size, SD standard deviation, con control group, exp experimental group

‘Exercise’ defined as “a subcategory of physical activity that is planned, structured, repetitive, and purposive in the sense that the improvement or maintenance of one or more components of physical fitness is the objective” [87] (pg. 250). The effect sizes for studies without a control group should be interpreted with caution for the following reasons: a) we do not control for dependency between outcomes in an uncontrolled pre-post design with our classical Cohen’s d, b) we have no control group data on the correlation between pre and post measurements, and c) from studies using a pre-experimental design we cannot rule out bias/placebo effects [88]

Critical appraisal method

Appraisal of individual study methodological quality was based on published quality assessment tools developed jointly by methodologists from NHLBI and Research Triangle Institute International (www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/in-develop/cardiovascular-risk-reduction/tools).

The NHLBI Appraisal tools (Additional file 1) includes items for evaluating the internal validity, descriptive criteria and statistical criteria of studies (Additional file 1). A quality rating (‘good’, ‘fair’, ‘poor’) was adapted from the review by Lim et al. [54]. Studies were considered to be of ‘good’ quality if at least 80% of the criteria were met; ‘fair’ quality when 51% to 79% of the criteria were met, and ‘poor’ quality when less than or equal to 50% of the criteria were met. Separate lists of methodological quality criteria were used for randomized controlled trials, uncontrolled pre-post studies and case control studies (Additional file 1).

Two evaluators (MH, MN) independently rated the methodological quality of the included studies using the NHLBI appraisal tools. Next, a kappa statistic was calculated for descriptive purposes and to investigate the agreement between the two evaluators on each appraisal tool (Additional file 1). The kappa values were interpreted using the criteria suggested by Tooth and Ottenbacher [55], <.40 poor agreement, .40 to .60 fair or moderate agreement, .60 to .80 good agreement, and >.80 perfect or excellent agreement. Additionally, we report the exact agreement among the two evaluators before disagreements about scoring were discussed (Additional file 1). Disagreements about scoring were resolved through discussion. If no consensus was reached, a third reviewer (EvW) made the final decision.

Effect size analysis

For individual RCT’s, we calculated the difference between the pre-to the post-intervention change scores for experimental and control groups. In case of MD-UPDRS-III, we used the mean difference (MD) between the change scores because the same outcome measure was assessed in the trials. For BDNF, reported as serum [56] and plasma levels [57], we used the standardized mean difference (SMD) based on Hedges’ g by calculating the MD, divided by the average population standard deviation (SDi). The MD or SMD values of individual studies were averaged (pooled), resulting in a summary effect size (SES) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Following Cohen [58] we classified effect sizes into small (<0.2), medium (0.2-0.8), and large (>0.8). The I2 statistic was calculated to determine between-study variation [59]. In case of statistical heterogeneity (I2 ≥50%,) we applied a random-effects model. For I2 <50 % a fixed-effect model was applied.

Two studies, one prospective study on exercise-induced changes in BDNF tyrosine receptor kinase signaling (BDNF-TrkB) [60] and the prospective study by Zoladz and colleagues [61], were excluded from the BDNF level effect size analysis. The study by Fontanesi et al. [60] was excluded from the BDNF meta-analysis analysis because the authors did not report serum or plasma BDNF levels but instead reported BDNF tyrosine receptor kinase signaling. The study by Zoladz et al. [61] was excluded from the BDNF meta-analysis analysis because there was significant overlap in the study participant groups included in the paper by Zoladz et al. [61] and the study participants included in the paper by Marusiak et al. [62] (personal communication with Dr. Marusiak). The more recent candidate paper by Marusiak et al. [62] with the larger sample size (11 healthy controls and 11 patients with PD) was chosen for inclusion.

Results

Summary of the literature

The subject demographic characteristics, study design, exercise dosing, outcome measures and results are described in Table 1. A total of 100 participants contributed to the studies reported in this review. For the evaluation of physical exercise on BDNF levels, data were aggregated from two RCTs [56, 57] with a total of 52 ambulatory in- and outpatients with mild to moderate idiopathic PD severity, mean 7.0±1.5 years after PD diagnosis and 68±5.6 years (mean±standard deviation) of age at the time of study enrollment. BDNF concentration was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using standardized procedures at the completion of the 28-day intervention in the study by Frazzitta et al. [56] and at the completion of the 90-day intervention in the study by Sajatovic et al. [57]. Percent change BDNF levels were reported from two pre-experimental studies (Marusiak et al. [62], Angelucci et al. [63] Table 1), with a total of 20 ambulatory in- and outpatients with mild to moderate idiopathic PD severity (Hoehn and Yahr stage ≤3, range 1-3), 9.8±6.0 years (range 2-26 years) after PD diagnosis and 66.8±8.3 years of age at the time of study enrollment. BDNF concentration was assessed by ELISA using standardized procedures at the completion of the 30-day intervention in the study by Angelucci et al. [63] and at the completion of the 60-day intervention in the study by Marusiak et al. [62].

Clinical outcomes data were aggregated from two RCTs [56, 57]; and four pre-experimental studies [6063] with a total of 100 ambulatory in- and outpatients with mild to moderate idiopathic PD severity (Hoehn and Yahr stage ≤3), 8.4±4.9 years after PD diagnosis, 68.7±6.8 years of age at the time of study enrollment. Methodological quality was scored for the six included studies [56, 57, 6063] (Additional file 1).

Across all studies the participant characteristics were relatively homogenous in terms of years of age, PD stage, years since diagnosis, and ambulatory status. The studies were clinically homogenous with regards to including stationary cycling [57, 6063] and administration of the MDS-UPDRS motor examination (Part III). Details about “on” or “off” state testing or training were not provided in the study by Fontanesi et al. [60] and Frazzitta et al. [56]. Physical exercise training, clinical outcome evaluations and BDNF testing procedures were conducted during the “on” phase in two studies [57, 63]. Zoladz et al. [61] and Marusiak et al. [62] administered outcome measures during the “off” phase. Differences among studies were noted regarding the use of elliptical machines [60], resistance training [57], physical therapy [56, 63], occupational therapy [60], treadmill training [56, 60, 63], Wii System Fit [63], and stabilometric platform [60]. All except one study reported exercise interventions being delivered by physiotherapists. Sajatovich et al. [57] used a Parkinson peer exercise leader to lead the exercise intervention. The setting for the interventions varied between laboratory [61, 62], hospital-based in-and out-patient [56, 60, 63] and fitness clinic-based [57]. The trial by Sajatovic et al. [57] was conducted in a community-based setting using a group versus an individual self-management program. In the study by Angelucci et al. [63] participants exercised in a group setting. None of the other studies reported details whether a group exercise intervention or an individual approach exercise intervention was used.

BDNF levels

BDNF levels assessed with laboratory measures were reported in 2 RCTs [56, 57] (N = 52) and pooling resulted in a significant homogeneous SES (SMD 2.06, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.76; Z = 5.77, P < .000001, I2 = 0%, Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Summary effect sizes for outcome of change in BDNF levels. Green squares indicate individual SES. Black colored diamond indicates the summary effect size; RCT randomized clinical trial, SD standard deviation, Std standardized, CI Confidence Interval, I2 statistic to determine heterogeneity, Z z-score

Clinical outcomes

MDS-UPDRS-III motor examination scores were reported in 2 RCTs [56, 57] (N = 52) and pooling resulted in a significant heterogeneous SES (MD -5.53, 95% CI -10.42 to -0.64; Z = 2.22, P = 0.03, I2 = 94%, Fig. 3). All studies noted statistically significant improvements for clinical outcome measures [56, 57, 6063] (Table 1).
Fig. 3

Summary effect sizes for outcome of change in MDS-UPDRS motor score. Green squares indicate individual SES. Black colored diamond indicates the summary effect size; RCT randomized clinical trial, SD standard deviation, CI Confidence Interval, I2 statistic to determine heterogeneity, Z z-score

Few studies conducted statistical analysis between exercise-induced BDNF blood concentration and scores on clinical outcome measures. Marusiak et al. [62] found a statistically significant association between interval training induced increases in BDNF concentration and decrease in Parkinsonian rigidity. The study by Fontanesi et al. [60] found a statistically significant association between inpatient rehabilitation induced increases in TrkB signaling in the lymphocytes and improvement in MDS-UPDRS total and MDS-UPDRS-II score. The trial by Frazzitta et al. [56] found no correlation between BDNF blood levels and the MDS-UPDRS motor examination score (Part III).

Methodological quality

A kappa statistic, which accounts for chance agreements between the two raters, was .62 for the trials by Frazzitta et al. [56] and Sajatovic et al. [57], .55 for the studies by Fontanesi et al. [60], Angelucci et al. [63] and Zoladz et al. [61], and .57 for the study by Marusiak et al. [62]. The percent agreement between the two raters was 72% to 77% (Additional file 1).

Strengths towards the internal validity of the studies included use of masked assessors, and administration of valid and reliable outcome measures. Four studies [56, 57, 60, 61] used assessors masked during the clinical outcomes testing, including the two randomized controlled trials [56, 57]. Five studies administered outcome measures that were valid, reliable and assessed consistently across all study participants [56, 57, 6062]. Three studies reported loss to follow-up after baseline testing, which was less than 20% [6062].

Deficiencies included the lack of an a-priori justification for the sample size needed to detect an exercise-induced effect on BDNF levels [6063], and lack of masking of the assessor conducting the BDNF assays [57, 6063]. Additional deficiencies noted were lack of description of adherence to the intervention, short duration of training and short follow-up, lack of details about method used for participant recruitment into study protocol, failure to characterize the cognitive status of patients, failure to describe adverse events, and failure to recruit younger age patients.

Each ‘deficiency’ noted above represents an opportunity for future research and discovery. For example, age and physical exercise intensity may be a rate limiting factor in activity-dependent BDNF neuroplasticity. To address patient age, a future study on the effect of physical exercise on BDNF concentration could compare the response to exercise by age group because younger patients with PD typically display greater baseline physiologic reserve (e.g., VO2 Maximum) than older patients with PD, and may be able to sustain physical exercise at higher physiologic intensities than older patients.

Studies BDNF Assays Procedures

BDNF assay procedures were reported by all studies. Sajatovic et al. [57] did not report if the blood sample collection was obtained in the morning or later during the day. Plasma samples of BDNF were assayed by using ELISA per manufacturer instructions (Quantikine® ELISA Human BDNF Immunoassay; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Frazzitta et al. [56] did not report blood sample collection time but reported that serum BDNF concentrations were evaluated in a capture ELISA according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer without including the kit manufacturer information. Marusiak et al. [62] and Zoladz et al. [61] assayed serum BDNF from morning blood samples with an ELISA Kit (Promega, Wallisellen, Switzerland) after appropriate dilution with Block and Sample solution (provided with the kit). Angelucci et al. [63] analyzed serum BDNF from blood samples that were obtained in the morning. Sandwich ELISA (R&D Systems, USA; cat. No. DY248) was used for BDNF assays according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Fontanesi [60] used morning blood samples for the BDNF assays by EDTA Western Blotting.

Discussion

The present systematic review and meta-analysis is the first to show aggregated evidence that physical exercise training increases BDNF blood levels in human PD. The main finding is that, in line with most pre-experimental studies that report significant results, pooling of the two available RCTs showed a significant SES in favour of physical exercise training for increasing BDNF levels. The BDNF results are paralleled by concomitant reductions in motor symptoms (UPDRS-scores), confirming possible effects on the dopaminergic pathways. Although our synthesis results support that controlled physical exercise training can have a positive impact on BDNF levels, and the number of publications in human PD is increasing, this review remains limited to a small number of studies that reported BDNF with few participants. Nevertheless, this is, to our knowledge, the first research synthesis study to evaluate the effects of controlled physical training trials on BDNF levels in human PD.

Our BDNF results are in line with prior human research in a variety of psychiatric conditions, and a recent review of neurotrophic factors in animal models of exercise and Parkinson’s disease [42]. Studies utilizing psychiatric conditions have reported clinical improvements with increased serum BDNF levels following non-pharmacological approaches, including exercise [64, 65], computer-assisted cognitive enhancement in schizophrenia [35] and mindfulness clinical trials in bipolar-disorder [66]. However, caution is warranted when extrapolating the results from psychiatric conditions to Parkinson’s disease because clinical measures used in psychiatric conditions are different from the UPDRS.

Collectively, our meta-analysis found a SES of -5.53 point improvement on the motor examination part of the UPDRS, which is beyond the minimal clinically important difference [67]. Data from the included studies on exercise-induced increases in BDNF blood concentration rarely correlated with clinical outcome measures [60, 62]. Studies are needed to determine the clinical relevance of exercise-induced increases in BDNF blood levels.

The most appropriate mode and intensity of exercise to achieve gains in BDNF concentrations in human PD remains controversial. For example, the 4-week intensive rehab training in the RCT of Frazzitta et al. [56] contained one hour of balance exercises and treadmill cue training, embedded in a daily three-hour general rehabilitation program but there is no information on duration of each sub-part. In contrast, Sajatovic et al. [57] administered fast-paced, low-resistance cycling for 20 minutes followed by resistance training for 20 minutes using a progressive sequence of resistance band, 3 times a week for 12 weeks [57]. These are quite different modes and intensity of exercise training but apparently give similar, favorable results on blood BDNF concentration.

The kappa value of .55 to .57, for the four uncontrolled studies and the kappa value of .62 for the two RCTs indicates fair to good agreement. The kappa value suggests that the raters accounted for 55% to 62% of the agreement over and above what would be expected by chance alone [55]. The percent exact agreement between the two raters -- those instances for which both raters agreed that a study fulfills a methodological quality criteria – was 72% to 77%, indicating raters agreed on over two-thirds of methodological quality items.

The evidence presented here is preliminary and does not address several important issues inherent to BDNF blood levels testing. BDNF has attracted increasing interest as potential biomarker to support the diagnosis or monitor the efficacy of therapies in brain disorders [64, 68]. Circulating BDNF levels can be measured in serum, plasma or whole blood. However, the use of BDNF as biomarker is limited by the probable poor reproducibility of results, likely due to the variety of methods used for sample collection and BDNF analysis, as well as the possible variations among performance for the different ELISA kits in term of intra-assay variation, inter-assay variation, detection range, and sensitivity [69]. In addition to the technical and methodological issues discussed here, several studies report that the socio-demographic determinants and other factors may affect serum levels of BDNF such as gender [70], age [71], body mass index [72], and disease status [69, 73]. Several studies have suggested an interaction, with respect to circulating BDNF, between gender and age [70, 71, 74]. Meta-analyses and reviews of clinical studies based on the measurement of BDNF in whole blood, serum, or plasma have reported significantly lower BDNF levels at diagnosis in patients with mental illnesses [7375]. These reviews however, highlighted severe discrepancies among studies, which even reported opposed results (increase versus decrease, or no change).

BDNF levels have also demonstrated to be affected by pharmacological treatments including antidepressant treatments [64, 75]. Regarding description of pharmacologic treatments in the included studies, only the study by Frazzitta et al. [56] stated that, in order to minimize a possible polypharmacy effect, participants were enrolled if they were currently taking rasagiline monotherapy. In the studies by Fontanesi et al. [60] and Frazzitta et al. [56], patients remained on their pharmacotherapy regimen throughout the study duration. Sajatovic et al. [57] reported that patients were on a stable dose of levodopa medication throughout the trial. Regarding enrolment of participants on anti-depressant medication, the trial by Sajatovic et al. [57] included participants who were on a stable dose of anti-depression medication for at least 1 month prior to trial enrolment. The trial by Frazzitta et al. [56] excluded patients who were on anti-depressant medication. The studies by Fontanesi et al. [60] Zoladz et al. [61] and Marusiak et al. [62] did not explicitly provide details about participants’ anti-depression medication.

BDNF variability of response may relate, in part, to age, sex, medication and dietary factors, disease duration, cognitive status, air quality, or genetic factors [60, 7682]. Studies have also shown differences in BDNF laboratory sample collection kits that may add an additional variability [83]. Concrete improvements to address variability in BDNF response may include adoption of repeated measures designs in which the sample is collected repeatedly from the same subject over time, pre and post training intervention (which would allow for within-subject comparisons), or use of surrogate markers of BDNF action (such as tyrosine receptor kinase signalling) as demonstrated in the forward thinking study by Fontanesi [60]. Additional improvements to decrease BDNF variability may include sampling from jugular vein catheters (instead of peripheral veins), or from saliva [82], directly after an exercise session.

Limitations

The main limitation of this review is the small number of papers that were available for inclusion. Although our results are based on a small number of studies, the participant characteristics were relatively homogenous in terms of years of age, Parkinson’s disease stage, years since diagnosis, and ambulatory status. The studies were also homogenous in the adoption of cycling training mode, administration of the MDS-UPDRS and the pharmacologic characteristics of the participants [57, 6063]. Our study is limited to the focus on one neurotrophic factor, exercise-induced changes in BDNF concentrations in human PD, and not other neurotrophic factors, which limits the generalizability to BDNF only. Although there are a number of potential opportunities for including BDNF as a clinical marker of brain health in PD [81], including outcome prediction [82], and/or development of physical exercise treatment interventions [84], further studies and methodological evaluations need to take place to standardize BDNF measurement and evaluate its usefulness as a clinical marker of brain health in PD.

The Cochrane Library Guidelines do not recommend meta-analysis when the designs of the studies are too different, if the outcomes measured are not sufficiently similar, or if there are concerns about the quality of the studies, for an average result across the studies to be meaningful (for review, see http://www.cochranelibrary.com/about/about-cochrane-systematic-reviews.html). Meta-analysis was a small part of the current review. We included all human studies, including non-randomized controlled studies (except case reports/single case studies as per exclusion criteria), covering the entire body of literature.

We emphasize that the small number of available studies is a limitation and further research is urgently needed to provide a realistic evaluation of the possible effects of exercise training on BDNF of PD patients. Prior international systematic reviews have evaluated effects of exercise training on BDNF and cognition (e.g., Alzheimer’s) and usually these synthesis reports also have had a small number of studies (between 6-8) [85].

We propose that strengths of the current preliminary meta-analysis and systematic review include: a) the manuscript addresses a clinically important, understudied area of neurorestorative rehabilitation research, and b) the results challenge and seek to shift current research and clinical practice paradigms by extending novel theoretical concepts of physiologic use of exercise on neuroplasticity in ageing human brain to humans living with Parkinson’s disease.

Conclusions

In summary, the presented results provide preliminary evidence of an exercise-induced increase in BDNF blood levels in human PD. Further high-quality, rigorously conducted randomized clinical trials of physical exercise effect on BDNF blood levels are needed to show robustness of the presented optimistic trend and to determine the neuroplastic mechanisms (for review, see [86]) that link BDNF blood levels, physical exercise, and functional outcomes in PD.

Abbreviations

PD: 

Parkinson’s disease

BDNF: 

brain-derived neurotrophic factor

TH: 

tyrosine hydroxylase

MPP+: 

1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium

CREB: 

cyclic AMP response element-binding protein

MDS: 

Movement Disorder Society

PRISMA: 

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

MD: 

mean difference

SMD: 

standardized mean difference

SDi: 

population standard deviation

SES: 

summary effect size

BDNF-TrkB: 

brain-derived neurotrophic factor tyrosine receptor kinase signaling

ELISA: 

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs Marusiak, Sajatovic and Angelucci for providing the mean and standard deviation BDNF levels for the data in their papers. We also thank C. Gurnsey for her contribution to the data collection. We are happy to provide the data in aggregate form. We thank the reviewers for helpful comments.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

MAH conceived the study. All authors contributed equally to the intellectual content. PH assisted with a priori protocol development and with the data abstraction forms. EvW performed the statistical analysis. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Carolinas Medical Center, Carolinas Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Charlotte, USA
(2)
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences/Amsterdam Neurosciences, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(3)
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Denver, USA

References

  1. Kalia LV, Lang AE. Parkinson's disease. Lancet. 2015;386:896–912.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cascaes da Silva F, Iop Rda R, Domingos dos Santos P, Aguiar Bezerra de Melo LM, Barbosa Gutierres Filho PJ, da Silva R. Effects of Physical-Exercise-Based Rehabilitation Programs on the Quality of Life of Patients With Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Aging Phys Act. 2016;24:484–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lauze M, Daneault JF, Duval C. The Effects of Physical Activity in Parkinson's Disease: A Review. J Parkinsons Dis. 2016;6:685–98.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Munneke M, Nijkrake MJ, Keus SH, Kwakkel G, Berendse HW, Roos RA, Borm GF, Adang EM, Overeem S, Bloem BR. Efficacy of community-based physiotherapy networks for patients with Parkinson's disease: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:46–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Petzinger GM, Fisher BE, McEwen S, Beeler JA, Walsh JP, Jakowec MW. Exercise-enhanced neuroplasticity targeting motor and cognitive circuitry in Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:716–26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Ridgel AL, Walter BL, Tatsuoka C, Walter EM, Colon-Zimmermann K, Welter E, Sajatovic M. Enhanced Exercise Therapy in Parkinson's disease: A comparative effectiveness trial. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19:12–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Saltychev M, Barlund E, Paltamaa J, Katajapuu N, Laimi K. Progressive resistance training in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e008756.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Schenkman M, Hall DA, Baron AE, Schwartz RS, Mettler P, Kohrt WM. Exercise for people in early- or mid-stage Parkinson disease: a 16-month randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2012;92:1395–410.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Tomlinson CL, Herd CP, Clarke CE, Meek C, Patel S, Stowe R, Deane KH, Shah L, Sackley CM, Wheatley K, Ives N. Physiotherapy for Parkinson's disease: a comparison of techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:Cd002815.Google Scholar
  10. Ahlskog JE. Does vigorous exercise have a neuroprotective effect in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2011;77:288–94.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Hirsch MA, Farley BG. Exercise, neuroplasticity and Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2009;45(2):215–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisher BE, Petzinger GM, Nixon K, Hogg E, Bremmer S, Meshul CK, Jakowec MW. Exercise-induced behavioral recovery and neuroplasticity in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-lesioned mouse basal ganglia. J Neurosci Res. 2004;77:378–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Petzinger GM, Walsh JP, Akopian G, Hogg E, Abernathy A, Arevalo P, Turnquist P, Vuckovic M, Fisher BE, Togasaki DM, Jakowec MW. Effects of treadmill exercise on dopaminergic transmission in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-lesioned mouse model of basal ganglia injury. J Neurosci. 2007;27:5291–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tajiri N, Yasuhara T, Shingo T, Kondo A, Yuan W, Kadota T, Wang F, Baba T, Tayra JT, Morimoto T, et al. Exercise exerts neuroprotective effects on Parkinson's disease model of rats. Brain Res. 2010;1310:200–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Alexi T, Hefti F. Neurotrophin-4/5 selectively protects nigral calbindin-containing neurons in rats with medial forebrain bundle transections. Neuroscience. 1996;72:911–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen AD, Tillerson JL, Smith AD, Schallert T, Zigmond MJ. Neuroprotective effects of prior limb use in 6-hydroxydopamine-treated rats: possible role of GDNF. J Neurochem. 2003;85:299–305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Daviaud N, Garbayo E, Sindji L, Martinez-Serrano A, Schiller PC, Montero-Menei CN. Survival, differentiation, and neuroprotective mechanisms of human stem cells complexed with neurotrophin-3-releasing pharmacologically active microcarriers in an ex vivo model of Parkinson's disease. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2015;4:670–84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Gu S, Huang H, Bi J, Yao Y, Wen T. Combined treatment of neurotrophin-3 gene and neural stem cells is ameliorative to behavior recovery of Parkinson's disease rat model. Brain Res. 2009;1257:1–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jiang P, Dang RL, Li HD, Zhang LH, Zhu WY, Xue Y, Tang MM. The impacts of swimming exercise on hippocampal expression of neurotrophic factors in rats exposed to chronic unpredictable mild stress. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:729827.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Jung SY, Kim DY, Yune TY, Shin DH, Baek SB, Kim CJ. Treadmill exercise reduces spinal cord injury-induced apoptosis by activating the PI3K/Akt pathway in rats. Exp Ther Med. 2014;7:587–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Koo HM, Lee SM, Kim MH. Spontaneous Wheel Running Exercise Induces Brain Recovery via Neurotrophin-3 Expression Following Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25:1103–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Real CC, Ferreira AF, Chaves-Kirsten GP, Torrao AS, Pires RS, Britto LR. BDNF receptor blockade hinders the beneficial effects of exercise in a rat model of Parkinson's disease. Neuroscience. 2013;237:118–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sauer H, Wong V, Bjorklund A. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-4/5 modify neurotransmitter-related gene expression in the 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rat striatum. Neuroscience. 1995;65:927–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sharma NK, Ryals JM, Gajewski BJ, Wright DE. Aerobic exercise alters analgesia and neurotrophin-3 synthesis in an animal model of chronic widespread pain. Phys Ther. 2010;90:714–25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Woodlee MT, Schallert T. The interplay between behavior and neurodegeneration in rat models of Parkinson's disease and stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22:153–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wu SY, Wang TF, Yu L, Jen CJ, Chuang JI, Wu FS, Wu CW, Kuo YM. Running exercise protects the substantia nigra dopaminergic neurons against inflammation-induced degeneration via the activation of BDNF signaling pathway. Brain Behav Immun. 2011;25:135–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ying Z, Roy RR, Edgerton VR, Gomez-Pinilla F. Exercise restores levels of neurotrophins and synaptic plasticity following spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2005;193:411–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Zigmond MJ, Exercise SRJ. is it a neuroprotective and if so, how does it work? Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014;20(Suppl 1):S123–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Knaepen K, Goekint M, Heyman EM, Meeusen R. Neuroplasticity - exercise-induced response of peripheral brain-derived neurotrophic factor: a systematic review of experimental studies in human subjects. Sports Med. 2010;40:765–801.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Szuhany KL, Bugatti M, Otto MW. A meta-analytic review of the effects of exercise on brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J Psychiatr Res. 2015;60:56–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Vaynman S, Gomez-Pinilla F. License to run: exercise impacts functional plasticity in the intact and injured central nervous system by using neurotrophins. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19:283–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Castellano V, White LJ. Serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor response to aerobic exercise in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2008;269:85–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gold SM, Schulz KH, Hartmann S, Mladek M, Lang UE, Hellweg R, Reer R, Braumann KM, Heesen C. Basal serum levels and reactivity of nerve growth factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor to standardized acute exercise in multiple sclerosis and controls. J Neuroimmunol. 2003;138:99–105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Green MJ, Matheson SL, Shepherd A, Weickert CS, Carr VJ. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in schizophrenia: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2011;16:960–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Vinogradov S, Fisher M, Holland C, Shelly W, Wolkowitz O, Mellon SH. Is serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor a biomarker for cognitive enhancement in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;66:549–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Gomez-Pinilla F, Zhuang Y, Feng J, Ying Z, Fan G. Exercise impacts brain-derived neurotrophic factor plasticity by engaging mechanisms of epigenetic regulation. Eur J Neurosci. 2011;33:383–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ahlskog JE, Geda YE, Graff-Radford NR, Petersen RC. Physical exercise as a preventive or disease-modifying treatment of dementia and brain aging. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86:876–84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Murer MG, Yan Q, Raisman-Vozari R. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the control human brain, and in Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. Prog Neurobiol. 2001;63:71–124.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Neeper SA, Gomez-Pinilla F, Choi J, Cotman C. Exercise and brain neurotrophins. Nature. 1995;373:109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Zuccato C, Cattaneo E. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Rev Neurol. 2009;5:311–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Campos C, Rocha NB, Lattari E, Paes F, Nardi AE, Machado S. Exercise-induced neuroprotective effects on neurodegenerative diseases: the key role of trophic factors. Expert Rev Neurother. 2016;16:723–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. da Silva PG, Domingues DD, de Carvalho LA, Allodi S, Correa CL. Neurotrophic factors in Parkinson's disease are regulated by exercise: Evidence-based practice. J Neurol Sci. 2016;363:5–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hirsch MA, Hirsch HVB. The Adaptable Brain: Biology of Social Neuroplasticity. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation. 2014;30:2–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Razgado-Hernandez LF, Espadas-Alvarez AJ, Reyna-Velazquez P, Sierra-Sanchez A, Anaya-Martinez V, Jimenez-Estrada I, Bannon MJ, Martinez-Fong D, Aceves-Ruiz J. The transfection of BDNF to dopamine neurons potentiates the effect of dopamine D3 receptor agonist recovering the striatal innervation, dendritic spines and motor behavior in an aged rat model of Parkinson's disease. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117391.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Fumagalli F, Racagni G, Riva MA. Shedding light into the role of BDNF in the pharmacotherapy of Parkinson's disease. Pharmacogenomics J. 2006;6:95–104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Nam JH, Leem E, Jeon MT, Jeong KH, Park JW, Jung UJ, Kholodilov N, Burke RE, Jin BK, Kim SR. Induction of GDNF and BDNF by hRheb(S16H) transduction of SNpc neurons: neuroprotective mechanisms of hRheb(S16H) in a model of Parkinson's disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2015;51:487–99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Markham A, Bains R, Franklin P, Spedding M. Changes in mitochondrial function are pivotal in neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders: how important is BDNF? Br J Pharmacol. 2014;171:2206–29.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Yang JL, Lin YT, Chuang PC, Bohr VA, Mattson MP. BDNF and exercise enhance neuronal DNA repair by stimulating CREB-mediated production of apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1. Neuromolecular Med. 2014;16:161–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Fox SH, Katzenschlager R, Lim SY, Ravina B, Seppi K, Coelho M, Poewe W, Rascol O, Goetz CG, Sampaio C. The Movement Disorder Society Evidence-Based Medicine Review Update: Treatments for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2011;26(Suppl 3):S2–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Keus SHJ, Munneke M, Graziano M. European Physiotherapy Guideline for Parkinson's disease. KNGF/ParkinsonNet: The Netherlands; 2014.Google Scholar
  51. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Heyn P, Abreu BC, Ottenbacher KJ. The effects of exercise training on elderly persons with cognitive impairment and dementia: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1694–704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer Program]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre; 2014.Google Scholar
  54. Lim I, van Wegen E, de Goede C, Deutekom M, Nieuwboer A, Willems A, Jones D, Rochester L, Kwakkel G. Effects of external rhythmical cueing on gait in patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:695–713.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Tooth LR, Ottenbacher KJ. The kappa statistic in rehabilitation research: an examination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1371–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Frazzitta G, Maestri R, Ghilardi MF, Riboldazzi G, Perini M, Bertotti G, Boveri N, Buttini S, Lombino FL, Uccellini D, et al. Intensive rehabilitation increases BDNF serum levels in parkinsonian patients: a randomized study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28:163–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Sajatovic M, Ridgel AL, Walter EM, Tatsuoka CM, Colon-Zimmermann K, Ramsey RK, Welter E, Gunzler SA, Whitney CM, Walter BL. A randomized trial of individual versus group-format exercise and self-management in individuals with Parkinson's disease and comorbid depression. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:965–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.Google Scholar
  59. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.Google Scholar
  60. Fontanesi C, Kvint S, Frazzitta G, Bera R, Ferrazzoli D, Di Rocco A, Rebholz H, Friedman E, Pezzoli G, Quartarone A, et al. Intensive Rehabilitation Enhances Lymphocyte BDNF-TrkB Signaling in Patients With Parkinson's Disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016;30:411–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Zoladz JA, Majerczak J, Zeligowska E, Mencel J, Jaskolski A, Jaskolska A, Marusiak J. Moderate-intensity interval training increases serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor level and decreases inflammation in Parkinson's disease patients. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2014;65:441–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Marusiak J, Zeligowska E, Mencel J, Kisiel-Sajewicz K, Majerczak J, Zoladz JA, Jaskolski A, Jaskolska A. Interval training-induced alleviation of rigidity and hypertonia in patients with Parkinson's disease is accompanied by increased basal serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47:372–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Angelucci F, Piermaria J, Gelfo F, Shofany J, Tramontano M, Fiore M, Caltagirone C, Peppe A. The effects of motor rehabilitation training on clinical symptoms and serum BDNF levels in Parkinson's disease subjects. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2016;94:455–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Archer T. Influence of physical exercise on traumatic brain injury deficits: scaffolding effect. Neurotox Res. 2012;21:418–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. El-Tamawy MS, Abd-Allah F, Ahmed SM, Darwish MH, Khalifa HA. Aerobic exercises enhance cognitive functions and brain derived neurotrophic factor in ischemic stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;34:209–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Lahera G, Bayon C, Fe Bravo-Ortiz M, Rodriguez-Vega B, Barbeito S, Saenz M, Avedillo C, Villanueva R, Ugarte A, Gonzalez-Pinto A, de Dios C. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy versus psychoeducational intervention in bipolar outpatients with sub-threshold depressive symptoms: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:215.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Horvath K, Aschermann Z, Acs P, Deli G, Janszky J, Komoly S, Balazs E, Takacs K, Karadi K, Kovacs N. Minimal clinically important difference on the Motor Examination part of MDS-UPDRS. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2015;21:1421–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Molendijk ML, Spinhoven P, Polak M, Bus BA, Penninx BW, Elzinga BM. Serum BDNF concentrations as peripheral manifestations of depression: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analyses on 179 associations (N=9484). Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19:791–800.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Polacchini A, Metelli G, Francavilla R, Baj G, Florean M, Mascaretti LG, Tongiorgi E. A method for reproducible measurements of serum BDNF: comparison of the performance of six commercial assays. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17989.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Bus BA, Molendijk ML, Penninx BJ, Buitelaar JK, Kenis G, Prickaerts J, Elzinga BM, Voshaar RC. Determinants of serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011;36:228–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Katoh-Semba R, Wakako R, Komori T, Shigemi H, Miyazaki N, Ito H, Kumagai T, Tsuzuki M, Shigemi K, Yoshida F, Nakayama A. Age-related changes in BDNF protein levels in human serum: differences between autism cases and normal controls. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2007;25:367–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. El-Gharbawy AH, Adler-Wailes DC, Mirch MC, Theim KR, Ranzenhofer L, Tanofsky-Kraff M, Yanovski JA. Serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentrations in lean and overweight children and adolescents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:3548–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Hashimoto K, Iwata Y, Nakamura K, Tsujii M, Tsuchiya KJ, Sekine Y, Suzuki K, Minabe Y, Takei N, Iyo M, Mori N. Reduced serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in adult male patients with autism. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2006;30:1529–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Fernandes BS, Gama CS, Cereser KM, Yatham LN, Fries GR, Colpo G, de Lucena D, Kunz M, Gomes FA, Kapczinski F. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor as a state-marker of mood episodes in bipolar disorders: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. J Psychiatr Res. 2011;45:995–1004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Bocchio-Chiavetto L, Bagnardi V, Zanardini R, Molteni R, Nielsen MG, Placentino A, Giovannini C, Rillosi L, Ventriglia M, Riva MA, Gennarelli M. Serum and plasma BDNF levels in major depression: a replication study and meta-analyses. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2010;11:763–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Scalzo P, Kummer A, Bretas TL, Cardoso F, Teixeira AL. Serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor correlate with motor impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neurology. 2010;257:540–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Ventriglia M, Zanardini R, Bonomini C, Zanetti O, Volpe D, Pasqualetti P, Gennarelli M, Bocchio-Chiavetto L. Serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in different neurological diseases. Biomed Research International. 2013. Article ID 901082. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/901082.
  78. Bos I, Jacobs L, Nawrot TS, de Geus B, Torfs R, Panis LI, Degraeuwe B, Meeusen R. No exercise-induced increase in serum BDNF after cycling near a major traffic road. Neuroscience Letters. 2011;500(2):129.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Bousquet M, Gibrat C, Saint-Pierre M, Julien C, Calon F, Cicchetti F. Modulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor as a potential neuroprotective mechanism of action of omega-3 fatty acids in a parkinsonian animal model. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2009;33(9):1401–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. He J, Xiang Z, Zhu X, Ai Z, Shen J, Huang T, Liu L, Ji W, Li T. Neuroprotective effects of 7, 8-dihydroxylflavone on midbrain dopaminergic neurons in MPP+-treated monkeys. Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 12;6:34339. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34339.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  81. Van der Kolk NM, Speelman AD, van Nimwegen M, Kessels RP, IntHout J, Hakobjan M, Munneke M, Bloem BR, van de Warrenburg BP. BDNF polymorphism associates with decline in set shifting in Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36:1605.e1601-e1606.Google Scholar
  82. Mougeot JL, Hirsch MA, Stevens CB, Mougeot F. Oral biomarkers in exercise-induced neuroplasticity in Parkinson's disease. Oral Dis. 2016;22:745–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Polacchini A, Metelli G, Francavilla R, Baj G, Florean M, Mascaretti LG, Tongiorgi E. A method for reproducible measurements of serum BDNF: comparison of the performance of six commercial assays. Scientific Reports. 2015;5:17989. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17989.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  84. Daviet JC, Roy X, Quelven-Bertin I, Jallageas R, Mandigout S, Torny F, Monteil J. Parkinson's patient runs an ultra marathon: a case report. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2014;50:447–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Piepmeier AT, Etnier JL. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) as a potential mechanism of the effects of acute exercise on cognitive performance. Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2015;4(1):14–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Francardo V, Schmitz Y, Sulzer D, Cenci MA. Neuroprotection and neurorestoration as experimental therapeutics for Parkinson’s disease. Experimental Neurology. 2017;298:137–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Rimmer JH, Chen MD, McCubbin JA, Drum C, Peterson J. Exercise intervention research on persons with disabilities: what we know and where we need to go. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89:249–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Morris SB, DeShon RP. Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-group designs. Psychological Methods. 2002;7(1):N–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement