Open Access

Salidroside reduces tau hyperphosphorylation via up-regulating GSK-3β phosphorylation in a tau transgenic Drosophila model of Alzheimer’s disease

Contributed equally
Translational Neurodegeneration20165:21

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40035-016-0068-y

Received: 5 November 2016

Accepted: 18 November 2016

Published: 29 November 2016

Abstract

Background

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is an age-related and progressive neurodegenerative disease that causes substantial public health care burdens. Intensive efforts have been made to find effective and safe treatment against AD. Salidroside (Sal) is the main effective component of Rhodiola rosea L., which has several pharmacological activities.

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of Sal in the treatment of AD transgenic Drosophila and the associated mechanisms.

Methods

We used tau transgenic Drosophila line (TAU) in which tau protein is expressed in the central nervous system and eyes by the Gal4/UAS system. After feeding flies with Sal, the lifespan and locomotor activity were recorded. We further examined the appearance of vacuoles in the mushroom body using immunohistochemistry, and detected the levels of total glycogen synthase kinase 3β (t-GSK-3β), phosphorylated GSK-3β (p-GSK-3β), t-tau and p-tau in the brain by western blot analysis.

Results

Our results showed that the longevity was improved in salidroside-fed Drosophila groups as well as the locomotor activity. We also observed less vacuoles in the mushroom body, upregulated level of p-GSK-3β and downregulated p-tau following Sal treatment.

Conclusion

Our data presented the evidence that Sal was capable of reducing the neurodegeneration in tau transgenic Drosophila and inhibiting neuronal loss. The neuroprotective effects of Sal were associated with its up-regulation of the p-GSK-3β and down-regulation of the p-tau.

Keywords

Alzheimer’s diseaseSalidroside Drosophila Glycogen synthase kinase 3βTau

Background

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive and fatal brain disorder, and affects approximately 36 million people worldwide. This number is expected to double during the next 20 years [1]. Neuropathologically, it is characterized by accumulation of extracellular senile plaques consisting of deposits of beta-amyloid (Aβ) and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles consisting of hyperphosphorylated tau protein, which ultimately lead to neuronal loss and brain atrophy [2, 3].

In fact, the tau hypothesis suggests that neurofibrillary tangles in the brain represent a major component of the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease [4], which is attributable to an abnormal phosphorylation of tau protein in the brains of AD patients. Under normal circumstances, tau protein is a neuronal microtubule-associated protein that has a crucial role in assemblage and stabilization of microtubules on neuronal axons and the inhibition of apoptosis [5, 6]. However, when tau is abnormally hyperphosphorylated, it destabilizes microtubules by decreasing the binding affinity of tau, and consequently leads to microtubule destabilization, disruption of the axonal transport system, and ultimately, the formation of intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). NFT formation spreads to various brain areas during AD progression, ultimately causing neuronal death [713]. Previous studies have shown that increasing tau phosphorylation occurs early in the development of AD [14, 15], and that Aβ associated clinical cognitive decline is identified only following such elevated tau phosphorylation [14, 16]. It is expected that intervening the formation of these toxic assemblies would attenuate the appearance and development of the symptoms of AD. Although many researches have discovered a great deal of pharmaceutical treatments for AD, no effective compound has been found so far for this debilitating neurodegenerative disease.

Over the past decades, drug therapies for AD primarily aim at slowing down the cognitive decline and ameliorating the behavioral symptoms, but the pharmacological effects of these drugs remain unsatisfactory. Salidroside (Sal), as one of the active ingredients extracted from the root of Rhodiola rosea L, which is extensively used in traditional folk medicine in Asian and European countries and has been reported to exhibit various strong pharmacological activities. The main effects of Sal are described as anti-oxidative, anti-apoptosis, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, and anti-fatigue effects [1723]. Additional studies have shown that Sal exerts a neuroprotective effect. For example, Sal is able to protect neurons from apoptosis induced by various factors [2426]. It remains undemonstrated whether Sal exerts neuroprotection against tau-induced toxicity in AD.

In the present study, we investigated the therapeutic potential of Sal in tau transgenic AD model. We found that Sal treatment could improve locomotor functions and prolong lifespan of AD transgenic Drosophila. Moreover, we demonstrated that Sal could protect neurons against tau-induced toxicity, which might be associated with regulation of GSK-3β.

Methods

Reagents

Salidroside (Sal, Purity > 99.7%) was obtained from the Green Valley Pharmaceutical Corporation (Shanghai, China). It was dissolved in PBS to a stock concentration of 100 mM and stored at − 20 °C. Donepezil was supplied by Eisai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan).

The following antibodies were used: Phospho-GSK-3β antibody, GSK-3β antibody, Mouse monoclonal Phospho-tau (ser396) antibody and tau (Cell Signaling Technology), Mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin antibody (Sigma–Aldrich, Clone AC-15), HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories, PA, USA). All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich except those noted otherwise.

Drosophila stocks

All Drosophila stocks were maintained at 25 °C under a 12:12 h light: dark cycle at constant 65% humidity as previously described [27]. The flies were raised in 50 ml plastic vials containing standard Drosophila medium. Transgenic upstream activating sequence (UAS) carrying human tau was obtained from Drosophila Stock Center (Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai).

Longevity assay

New flies were collected within 24 h after eclosion for the experiment. At least 100 flies of each genotype were collected and divided into fresh food vials of 20 flies. Food vials were changed every 2–3 days, and the number of dead flies was counted at that time. The survival times described were given as median standard error of the median. Survival curves were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimation and log-rank statistical analysis.

Climbing assay

Locomotor function of Drosophila was measured according to the climbing assay as previously reported [28]. Briefly, 10 male flies per 25 ml tube (n = 30 for each group) were placed at the bottom, and given 30 min to recover. After 10 s of climbing, the numbers of Drosophila between the 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 ml scale marks were recorded with a video camera. The experiment was performed three times. The results for each group were calculated by the formula below:
$$ \begin{array}{ll}\mathrm{Climbing}\ \mathrm{Index}\hfill & = \left(\mathrm{flies}\ \mathrm{above}\ 20\ \mathrm{ml}\ \mathrm{s}\mathrm{cale}\ \mathrm{mark}\right) \times 1\hfill \\ {}\hfill & + \left(\mathrm{flies}\ \mathrm{between}\ 15\ \mathrm{and}\ 20\ \mathrm{ml}\ \mathrm{s}\mathrm{cale}\ \mathrm{mark}\mathrm{s}\right) \times 0.8\hfill \\ {}\hfill & + \left(\mathrm{flies}\ \mathrm{between}\ 10\ \mathrm{and}\ 15\ \mathrm{ml}\ \mathrm{s}\mathrm{cale}\ \mathrm{mark}\mathrm{s}\right) \times 0.6\hfill \\ {}\hfill & + \left(\mathrm{flies}\ \mathrm{between}\ 5\ \mathrm{and}\ 10\ \mathrm{ml}\ \mathrm{s}\mathrm{cale}\ \mathrm{mark}\mathrm{s}\right) \times 0.4\hfill \\ {}\hfill & + \left(\mathrm{flies}\ \mathrm{below}\ 5\ \mathrm{ml}\ \mathrm{s}\mathrm{cale}\ \mathrm{mark}\right) \times 0.2.\hfill \end{array} $$

Histological analysis

For immunostaining analysis, flies (n = 10 for each group) were fixed in freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde, processed to embed in paraffin blocks, and sectioned at a thickness of 5 μm. Sections were placed on slides, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and examined by bright field illumination using a Leica DM 2500 microscope at the magnification of 60×. The areas of the vacuoles in the cell body or neuropil regions were captured.

Western blot analysis

After treatment, fly heads (n = 50 for each group) were homogenized in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Basle, Switzerland) and 1 mM phenylmethyl sulfonyl-fluoride (PMSF) for 30 min on ice. Total extracts were centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 30 min and boiled in 4× SDS loading buffer for 5 min. The samples were subjected to SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The membranes were blocked using 5% skim milk in TBST for 1 h then incubated at 4 °C overnight with respective primary antibodies to t-GSK-3β(1:1000), p-GSK-3β(1:1000), t-tau (1:1000), p-tau (1:1000) and β-actin (1:5000). After being washed three times with TBST, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit/mouse antibody (1:10000) for 2 h at room temperature. Visualized with the indicated antibodies using Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (Millipore) and analyzed by ImageJ (National Institutes of Health) software. All the experiments were performed at least three times and the most representative results were shown.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software 19.0(SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The Kaplan–Meier test was used to assess the difference in the lifespan curves. Two-group comparisons were analyzed using Student t-test. A comparison of three or more groups was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. All experiments were carried out in triplicate (n = 3) and results were expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Calculated comparisons were at confidence interval (CI) 95%. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Sal prolonged the lifespan of AD transgenic flies

Drosophila AD models were generated by expressing human tau, which have been assisted in the identification of novel targets for therapy [29]. These models show intracellular neurofibrillary tangles consisting of hyperphosphorylated tau protein and ultimately significant reduction in longevity [29, 30]. To assess the effect of Sal in living organisms, we firstly fed human tau transgenic flies with Sal in various concentrations (2 μM, 6 μM and 20 μM) or Donepezil (10 μM, the clinically approved drug for the treatment of AD) as positive control and measured their survival duration. We found that the lifespan of Sal-treated flies was more prolonged compared to that of the untreated flies. Sal treatment increased both the survival rate and the median survival time of flies, which is comparable to the improving effect of Donepezil (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Salidroside treatment improves lifespan of AD transgenic Drosophila. a Survival trajectories of TAU flies with different treatment. b Salidroside treatment prolonged survival time of tau transgenic flies. Donepezil was used as positive Control. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival analysis was applied to the survival data. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001

Sal treatment improved locomotor activity in AD flies

Locomotor assay is a behavioral paradigm to assess the neural functional abnormalities based on the negative geotaxis against gravity. We fed tau flies with Sal or Donepezil at different time points (10, 20, 30, and 40 days), and we found Sal treatment improved the climbing ability of these AD transgenic flies significantly in a dose dependent manner after 30 days compared to the control (the ctrl group) (Fig. 2). However, no obvious difference was observed between the treated and non-treated groups at time points of 10 and 20 days (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Salidroside increases the locomotor activity. The climbing ability of flies at 10 days, 20 days,30 days and 40 days after eclosion. TAU flies without any treatment showed an activity decrease with increased age but the treatment of Sal and Donepezil enhanced the activity of TAU flies at 30 days or 40 days. The values are mean ± SEM. # P < 0.01 compared to the control group with one-way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey test

Effects of Sal on neuronal loss in AD flies

The tau flies were able to replicate the features of human in progressive neurodegeneration with some extent as previously reported [31]. The appearance of vacuoles in the brain is thought as a hallmark of neurodegeneration in Drosophila, which represents the neuronal loss of brain [27]. As seen in Fig. 3, the transgenic AD fly model showed numerous vacuoles and exhibited loosely packed neurons all over the mushroom body at postnatal 30 days. Sal treatment in the dose of 6 μM was able to prevent these histological abnormalities in vacuoles and neuronal packing phenotype, which appeared a better therapeutic effect than that in Donepezil- treated group.
Fig. 3

Effect of salidroside on tau-induced neurotoxicity in vivo. Treatment of Sal and Donepezil rescued the neurodegeneration in TAU flies. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of a TAU fly brain (a). Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the brain of a TAU fly without any treatment (b), TAU fly treated with Sal (c), and TAU fly treated with Donepezil (d). Arrowheads indicate neurodegeneration. Bar:50 μm. Right-panels, Bar: 10 μm

Sal regulated GSK-3β phosphorylation

To explore the signaling pathways that may be involved in Sal effects, we next assessed whether Sal affected GSK-3β phosphorylation and tau phosphorylation in flies, as GSK-3β signal pathway exerts a crucial role in promoting neuronal survival under a variety of circumstances, while tau hyperphosphorylation and microtubule destabilization is widely acknowledged in AD [3234]. We detected GSK-3β protein expression in Drosophila brain after Sal or Donepezil treatment, and found that Sal increased the level of p-GSK-3β effectively while decreased the level of p-tau, a downstream target of GSK-3β (Fig. 4). This result indicates that the neuroprotective effects of Sal in the tau transgenic AD flies might be associated with the regulation of GSK-3β.
Fig. 4

Salidroside inhibits tau-induced neurotoxicity by activating the GSK-3β in vivo. a Tau-expressing transgenic flies were treated with Sal or Donepezil for 30 days. The levels of total GSK-3β, total tau, phosphorylated GSK-3β and phosphorylated tau were detected and compared with the control group. b The expression levels of GSK-3β, tau and their phosphorylated form were detected. All data are presented as mean ± SEM.*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test)

Discussion

During the last decade, Drosophila has emerged and been recognized as a powerful model to study human neurodegenerative diseases including AD. Although this model can not detect memory and cognitive function, the short generation time and short lifespan make it particularly amenable to study such age-related disorders [30, 3537]. In the present study, we showed that Sal treatment prolonged the lifespan and improved locomotor abilities in a tau-expressing transgenic Drosophila model. Furthermore, we demonstrated that Sal could dramatically attenuate the neuronal loss in the brains. As far as we know, this is the first evidence for Sal play an important protective role in neurons through up-regulatingGSK-3β phosphorylation in transgenic flies. As Sal was reported with property of non-toxic and mitigated neurotoxicity [38], our study provides a potential promising drug candidate for AD therapy.

In the last two decades, drug discovery and development efforts for AD have been dominated by the “amyloid cascade hypothesis,” focusing on targets defined by this hypothesis and proposing amyloid as the main cause of neural death and dementia. Unfortunately, several clinical trials with anti-Aβ agents failed, thus challenging the hypothesis that Aβ accumulation is the initiating event in the pathological cascade of AD, so we need to explore some novel therapeutic approaches and targets [39]. In recent years, tau-based treatments for AD have become a point of increasing focus and future investigational therapies [40]. Inhibition of the toxicity of tau in the brain may offer significant promise for the treatment of this disease. Our experiments in tau-expressing transgenic Drosophila showed that Sal attenuated tau-induced cytotoxicity effectively, suggesting a novel effect of Sal through inhibiting the tau phosphorylation in AD brain.

GSK-3β is a ubiquitously expressed serine/threonine kinase that plays a key role in the pathogenesis of AD. GSK-3β phosphorylates tau in most serine and threonine residues hyperphosphorylated in paired helical filaments [41]. The effect of Sal in the flies increased GSK-3β phosphorylation significantly, while inhibiting tau phosphorylation simultaneously. These results suggest a possible causal relationship for Sal effect between tau hyperphosphorylation and the regulation of GSK-3β phosphorylation. Taken together, the findings of these experiments support the proposition that Sal plays an important role in providing the neuroprotection for AD by regulating tau phosphorylation.

Conclusion

In summary, we demonstrated that the treatment with Sal relieved the behavioral and pathological changes in a tau transgenic Drosophila model, and the mechanism was associated with its reducing tau hyperphosphorylation via up-regulating GSK-3β phosphorylation. These findings suggest that the Sal may protect neurons from degeneration in brains of AD models, and provide a potential approach in prevention and treatment of AD models. Although Sal has been prescribed to patients with cardiovascular disease and exhibited various pharmacological activities, further multiple studies should be carried out to evaluate the efficacies of Sal against AD.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Nan-Jie Xu for helpful comments on the manuscript, and Dr. Gang Pei for providing transgenic Drosophila.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Fund (91332107, 81430022, 81371407). All founding were used for the design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data and in writing in the manuscript.

Availability of data and material

The data will not be shared with the reason that we decided to do further research.

Authors’ contributions

All authors read and approved the final manuscript. BZ summarized the background. QL, XC and BZ performed the experiment. BZ and QL conceived, designed, and performed the paper. SC and SS revised the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Consent for publication

Not relevant.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not relevant.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
(2)
Laboratory of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Institute of Health Sciences, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences (SIBS), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) & Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (SJTUSM)

References

  1. Wimo A, et al. The worldwide economic impact of dementia 2010. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(1):1–11. e3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Querfurth HW, LaFerla FM. Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(4):329–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hardy J, Selkoe DJ. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science. 2002;297(5580):353–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hutton M, Hardy J. The presenilins and Alzheimer’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6(10):1639–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Scholz T, Mandelkow E. Transport and diffusion of Tau protein in neurons. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014;71(16):3139–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ballatore C, et al. Microtubule stabilizing agents as potential treatment for Alzheimer’s disease and related neurodegenerative tauopathies. J Med Chem. 2012;55(21):8979–96.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Brunden KR, et al. Brain-penetrant microtubule-stabilizing compounds as potential therapeutic agents for tauopathies. Biochem Soc Trans. 2012;40(4):661–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Duan Y, et al. Advances in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease: focusing on tau-mediated neurodegeneration. Transl Neurodegener. 2012;1(1):24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Grundke-Iqbal I, et al. Abnormal phosphorylation of the microtubule-associated protein tau (tau) in Alzheimer cytoskeletal pathology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83(13):4913–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Grundke-Iqbal I, et al. Microtubule-associated protein tau. A component of Alzheimer paired helical filaments. J Biol Chem. 1986;261(13):6084–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Iqbal K, et al. Defective brain microtubule assembly in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 1986;2(8504):421–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kosik KS, Joachim CL, Selkoe DJ. Microtubule-associated protein tau (tau) is a major antigenic component of paired helical filaments in Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83(11):4044–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Gomez-Isla T, et al. Neuronal loss correlates with but exceeds neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 1997;41(1):17–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Desikan RS, et al. Amyloid-beta--associated clinical decline occurs only in the presence of elevated P-tau. Arch Neurol. 2012;69(6):709–13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Obulesu M, Venu R, Somashekhar R. Tau mediated neurodegeneration: an insight into Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Neurochem Res. 2011;36(8):1329–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Desikan RS, et al. Amyloid-beta associated volume loss occurs only in the presence of phospho-tau. Ann Neurol. 2011;70(4):657–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhu Y, et al. Salidroside protects against hydrogen peroxide-induced injury in cardiac H9c2 cells via PI3K-Akt dependent pathway. DNA Cell Biol. 2011;30(10):809–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Shi K, et al. Salidroside protects retinal endothelial cells against hydrogen peroxide-induced injury via modulating oxidative status and apoptosis. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2015;79(9):1406–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jin H, et al. Therapeutic intervention of learning and memory decays by salidroside stimulation of neurogenesis in aging. Mol Neurobiol. 2016;53(2):851–66.Google Scholar
  20. Feng Y, et al. Optimization on Preparation Conditions of Salidroside Liposome and Its Immunological Activity on PCV-2 in Mice. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:178128.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu S, et al. Salidroside rescued mice from experimental sepsis through anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptosis effects. J Surg Res. 2015;195(1):277–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhao G, et al. Salidroside inhibits the growth of human breast cancer in vitro and in vivo. Oncol Rep. 2015;33(5):2553–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Li X, et al. Effect of Tongxinluo on nerve regeneration in mice with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-Grand). 2015;61(5):103–7.Google Scholar
  24. Xian H, et al. MADP, a salidroside analog, protects hippocampal neurons from glutamate induced apoptosis. Life Sci. 2014;103(1):34–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang B, et al. Neuroprotective effects of salidroside through PI3K/Akt pathway activation in Alzheimer’s disease models. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016;10:1335–43.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Xiao L, et al. Salidroside protects Caenorhabditis elegans neurons from polyglutamine-mediated toxicity by reducing oxidative stress. Molecules. 2014;19(6):7757–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang Y, et al. The combination of aricept with a traditional Chinese medicine formula, smart soup, may be a novel way to treat Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;45(4):1185–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee FK, et al. The role of ubiquitin linkages on alpha-synuclein induced-toxicity in a Drosophila model of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurochem. 2009;110(1):208–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mudher A, et al. GSK-3beta inhibition reverses axonal transport defects and behavioural phenotypes in Drosophila. Mol Psychiatry. 2004;9(5):522–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Folwell J, et al. Abeta exacerbates the neuronal dysfunction caused by human tau expression in a Drosophila model of Alzheimer’s disease. Exp Neurol. 2010;223(2):401–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Greeve I, et al. Age-dependent neurodegeneration and Alzheimer-amyloid plaque formation in transgenic Drosophila. J Neurosci. 2004;24(16):3899–906.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rapoport M, et al. Tau is essential to beta -amyloid-induced neurotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(9):6364–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Mohamed NV, et al. Spreading of tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease by cell-to-cell transmission. Eur J Neurosci. 2013;37(12):1939–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Iqbal K, Gong CX, Liu F. Microtubule-associated protein tau as a therapeutic target in Alzheimer’s disease. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2014;18(3):307–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tan Y, Ji YB, Zhao J. Research progress of transgenic Drosophila model of Alzheimer disease. Yao Xue Xue Bao. 2013;48(3):333–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Caesar I, et al. Curcumin promotes A-beta fibrillation and reduces neurotoxicity in transgenic Drosophila. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31424.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Iijima K, Gatt A, Iijima-Ando K. Tau Ser262 phosphorylation is critical for Abeta42-induced tau toxicity in a transgenic Drosophila model of Alzheimer’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(15):2947–57.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Gao J, et al. Salidroside ameliorates cognitive impairment in a d-galactose-induced rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Behav Brain Res. 2015;293:27–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Panza F, et al. Tau-Centric Targets and Drugs in Clinical Development for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:3245935.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Harrington CR, et al. Cellular Models of Aggregation-dependent Template-directed Proteolysis to Characterize Tau Aggregation Inhibitors for Treatment of Alzheimer Disease. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(17):10862–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Ma T. GSK3 in Alzheimer’s disease: mind the isoforms. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;39(4):707–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement