Open Access

Meta-analyses on prevalence of selected Parkinson’s nonmotor symptoms before and after diagnosis

  • Honglei Chen1Email author,
  • Edward J Zhao1,
  • Wen Zhang1,
  • Yi Lu2,
  • Rui Liu1,
  • Xuemei Huang3,
  • Anna J Ciesielski-Jones2,
  • Michele A Justice2,
  • Deborah S Cousins2 and
  • Shyamal Peddada4
Translational Neurodegeneration20154:1

https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-9158-4-1

Received: 13 October 2014

Accepted: 5 January 2015

Published: 8 January 2015

Abstract

Background

Nonmotor symptoms are common among patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and some may precede disease diagnosis.

Methods

We conducted a meta-analysis on the prevalence of selected nonmotor symptoms before and after PD diagnosis, using random-effect models. We searched PubMed (1965 through October/November 2012) for the following symptoms: hyposmia, constipation, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, excessive daytime sleepiness, depression, and anxiety. Eligible studies were publications in English with original data on one or more of these symptoms.

Results

The search generated 2,373 non-duplicated publications and 332 met the inclusion criteria, mostly (n = 320) on symptoms after PD diagnosis. For all symptoms, the prevalence was substantially higher in PD cases than in controls, each affecting over a third of the patients. Hyposmia was the most prevalent (75.5% in cases vs. 19.1% in controls), followed by constipation (50% vs. 17.7%), anxiety (39.9% vs. 19.1%), rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (37.0% vs. 7.0%), depression (36.6% vs. 14.9%), and excessive daytime sleepiness (33.9% vs. 10.5%). We observed substantial heterogeneities across studies and meta-regression analyses suggested that several factors might have contributed to this. However, the prevalence estimates were fairly robust in several sensitivity analyses. Only 20 studies had data on any symptoms prior to PD diagnosis, but still the analyses revealed higher prevalence in future PD cases than in controls.

Conclusion

These symptoms are common among PD patients both before and after diagnosis. Further studies are needed to understand the natural history of nonmotor symptoms in PD and their etiological and clinical implications.

Keywords

Parkinson’s diseaseNonmotor symptomsMeta-analysisPrevalenceNatural history

Parkinson disease (PD) is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disease and affects over one percent of the elderly. In addition to motor dysfunction, PD patients also suffer from a variety of nonmotor symptoms (NMS), ranging from hyposmia and depression early-on to dementia and visual hallucination at later stages of the disease. Many of these symptoms adversely affect the quality of life of PD patients [1], and some may precede PD diagnosis by years [2]. These prodromal NMS include hyposmia [3], constipation [46], depression [7, 8], anxiety [7, 9], rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) [10, 11], and excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) [12, 13]. The presence of these NMS in prodromal PD is consistent with the Braak hypothesis [14] which implies that they may occur as the result of underlying Lewy pathogenesis at olfactory bulb, enteric nerves, and lower brainstem, before invading substantia nigra. If this hypothesis were true, investigation of early NMS may not only improve PD clinical care, but also advance our knowledge of PD etiology and natural history [15]. Fundamental to this research is to understand the prevalence and incidence of each symptom at various stages of PD. Yet, reported prevalence of these symptoms in PD patients varies greatly across published reports. For example, the reported proportion of hyposmia among PD patients ranges from 27% [16] to 100% [17], and depression from 4% [18] to 80.5% [19]. We therefore conducted meta-analyses to estimate the prevalence of these NMS before and after PD diagnosis.

Methods

Literature search and data abstraction

In October and November 2012, NIEHS librarians conducted separate searches for publications on each of the following NMS of PD: hyposmia, constipation, anxiety, depression, EDS, and RBD. We selected these symptoms because of clear evidence that they could develop prior to PD diagnosis. The searches were primarily based on MeSH terms for individual symptoms supplemented with keyword searches in titles or abstracts specifically to identify papers that had not yet been indexed by PubMed. We limited searches to studies that were relevant to PD by applying the MeSH Term/Major paper to “Parkinson Disease” or searching for the keywords “Parkinson’s OR Parkinson OR Parkinsons”. For MeSH terms, we used “olfaction disorders” for hyposmia, “constipation” for constipation, “depressive disorder” or “depression” for depression, “anxiety” or “anxiety disorders” for anxiety, “disorders of excessive somnolence” for EDS, and “REM sleep behavior disorder” for RBD. For the keyword searches, we used “olfact*”, “hyposmia”, “anosmia” or “smell” for hyposmia; “constipat* or “bowel movement” for constipation; “depress*” for depression, “anxiet*” or “anxious*” for anxiety; “daytime sleepiness” for EDS; and “rapid eye movement”, “rapid-eye-movement”, “REM”, or “RBD” for RBD. In addition to these specific symptoms, we also searched for general terms of pre-motor symptoms, using “early diagnosis” as the MeSH term and “non-motor” or “nonmotor”, or “premotor” or “pre-motor” or “prodrom*” as keywords. The search was restricted to original publications on one or more of these NMS by limiting searches to “Humans” and “English language” and by excluding comments, case reports, editorials, reviews, or letters. These searches generated a total of 2,298 entries. These searches were further supplemented with 592 articles from a separate search conducted in June 2011. The 2011 search used a combination of MeSH terms and keywords for PD and a broader range of individual NMS. Combing these two searches, we identified a total of 2,890 references. After excluding 517 duplicates, 2,373 were left for review.

Two authors independently screened the title and abstract of each paper and full text if necessary to determine study eligibility. Eligible studies are original publications that either reported prevalence of one or more NMS or provided original data from which prevalence could be calculated. Therefore, studies that only provided risk estimates such as relative risk without numbers of individuals with the symptoms were not eligible. We excluded studies for the following reasons: 1) duplicate populations (n = 22); 2) studies that did not have data on any of the above-referenced NMS (n = 1,144); 3) publications without original data, such as reviews, comments, editorials, or case-reports (n = 438); 4) non-English publications (n = 131); 5) non-human studies (n = 121); and 6) studies that could not be generalized to late-onset sporadic PD (n = 185). The full texts of 332 eligible studies were subsequently reviewed and relevant data were abstracted. For papers that reported data on more than one symptom, we abstracted data for each symptom separately. Similarly, for studies that reported data both after and prior to PD diagnosis, relevant data were abstracted separately. At each step, disagreements were resolved by group discussion and re-reviews. The details of the literature search are shown in Figure 1 and the characteristics of these studies are provided in Additional file 1: Table S1.
Figure 1

Flow chart of literature review and data abstraction.

NMS assessments

Details of symptom assessment in individual studies are provided in Additional file 1: Tables S2-S7. Assessment methods varied across studies and are summarized in Additional file 1: Table S8. Even for studies that used the same method, often different cutoffs were used. For the purpose of this meta-analysis, we refer NMS to symptoms rather than specific clinical diagnoses. Further, because we do not have original data of individual studies, we adopted symptom definitions that were used in individual studies.

Statistical analyses

For the purpose of this meta-analysis, prevalence was defined as the proportion of individuals with a specific symptom among PD patients or among participants without PD (controls). As many clinical studies have a small sample size, rather than using the standard sample proportion to estimate prevalence, we used a Bayes estimator as commonly advocated for such situations [20]. In particular, we used the Laplace estimator [21] by adding one to the numerator (individuals with symptom) and two to the denominator (total number of participants) to all studies in order to obtain a more reasonable estimate in the meta-analyses. Such estimators of the binomial proportion are often used when dealing rare events to avoid zero estimates (with 0 standard error) for events that occur with small probabilities. Pooled prevalence estimates and standard errors were calculated using the random-effects model to account for between-study variations. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed using Cochran Q and I2 statistics [22]. For symptoms after diagnosis among PD cases, we further conducted sensitivity analyses to examine the robustness of our estimates by removing studies with fewer than 50 PD cases, studies without controls, or studies that simply used self-reported symptoms in NMS assessment. We assessed publication bias graphically using a funnel plot and quantitatively using the Begg rank correlation test and the Egger regression asymmetry test [23].

For symptoms after diagnosis, we further conducted meta-regression analyses among cases to examine factors that might have contributed to prevalence in individual studies. In these analyses, we performed logit transformation of the Laplace estimator since they are bounded between 0 and 1 and regression analysis requires unbounded support [21]. Due to the small number of studies, we did not conduct meta-regression analyses among controls or pre-diagnostic cases and controls. For the same reason, we did not evaluate publication bias for studies prior to PD diagnosis. Data preparation was performed using the SAS Software 9.3 (SAS Inc. Cary, NC) and statistical analyses were performed using STATA, version 11.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).

Results

As shown in Figure 1, 320 studies reported data on symptoms after PD diagnosis; the exact number varies by symptoms from 39 for hyposmia to 170 for depression (Additional file 1: Table S1). Many studies provided data only on PD cases, and fewer included controls. For all symptoms, on average, approximately 60% of the cases were men and the average age at symptom evaluation was mid-60s, about seven years after diagnosis. Only 20 studies provided data on symptoms prior to PD diagnosis. Of these, several publications used data from large general purpose cohorts and therefore included few cases but a very large number of controls. Further, it is difficult to define the age or time of symptom assessment as many studies assessed cumulative prevalence – ever presence of symptoms prior to survey or disease diagnosis. Details of individual studies are summarized in Additional file 1: Tables S2-7.

Measurements of NMS

A variety of methods were used in the assessment of NMS across studies and symptoms (Additional file 1: Table S8). Generally speaking, self-report was commonly used across symptoms. Structured questionnaires were most frequently used for assessing anxiety, depression, and EDS, while clinical examinations were used most often for RBD. For hyposmia, most likely an objective smell identification test was conducted.

Prevalence of symptoms after diagnoses

Each NMS affected at least a third of PD patients, 2.1 (anxiety) to 5.3 (RBD) times higher than the prevalence in controls. Hyposmia was the most prevalent in cases (75.5% vs. 19.1% in controls), followed by constipation (50.0% vs. 17.7%), anxiety (39.9% vs. 19.1%), RBD (37.0% vs. 7.0%), depression (36.6% vs. 14.9%), and EDS (33.9% vs. 10.5%). Similar results were obtained from all three sensitivity analyses (Table 1) (Figure 2).
Table 1

Sensitivity analyses of the prevalence of selected non-motor symptoms of PD after diagnosis

 

PD cases

Controls

 

All data

Sample size ≥50

Studies with controls

Not self-reported single symptom

All data

Sample size ≥50

Not self-reported single symptom

 

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

Anxiety

54

39.9 ± 2.3

46

39.7 ± 2.5

5

33.9 ± 12.6

33

36.3 ± 2.4

5

19.1 ± 7.2

4

16.7 ± 7.7

2

17.3 ± 11.8

Constipation

50

50 ± 2.3

34

47.4 ± 2.5

14

44.8 ± 4.6

11

58.9 ± 5.8

14

17.7 ± 3.5

9

21 ± 4.2

3

16.7 ± 4.1

Depression

170

36.6 ± 1.4

136

35.7 ± 1.6

25

36.3 ± 3.7

145

35.6 ± 1.5

25

14.9 ± 1.8

20

15 ± 1.9

20

13.7 ± 1.8

EDS

74

33.9 ± 1.7

58

32.9 ± 1.9

22

32.8 ± 2.3

46

35.4 ± 1.8

22

10.5 ± 1.6

14

11.6 ± 2.1

17

9.2 ± 1.3

Hyposmia

39

75.5 ± 4.2

21

71 ± 5.9

17

76.5 ± 3.7

36

78.1 ± 2.7

17

19.1 ± 3.1

5

19.8 ± 5.5

16

20.1 ± 3.3

RBD

71

37 ± 1.8

51

36 ± 2

7

34.6 ± 8

53

39 ± 2.2

6

7 ± 2.4

3

7.4 ± 3.3

5

6.8 ± 3.4

Figure 2

Meta-analysis of the prevalence of selected non-motor symptoms after PD diagnosis.

There were however substantial heterogenities across studies in these analyses (cases: I 2  = 92.5% to 94.4%, all P < 0.05; controls: I 2  = 82.3% to 97.6%, all P <0.05). We therefore conducted meta-regression analyses among cases to evaluate potential sources of heterogenity (Table 2). Age at examination was not a major contributor to study heterogenity except for EDS, which was positively associated with age at examination. Disease duration was positively related to the prevalence of constipation and EDS across studies. Compared to studies using self-reported symptoms, studies with clinical examinations or structured questionnaires showed lower prevalence of anxiety. Studies using smell test showed much higher prevalence of hyposmia than self-reports. Compared to studies that were conducted in North America, studies carried out in other areas of the world showed higher prevalence of depression, and in Asia higher prevalence of constipation.
Table 2

Patient characteristics and non-motor symptoms of PD meta-regression analysis among cases a

 

Anxiety

Constipation

Depression

EDS

Hyposmia

RBD

 

(N = 48)

(N = 39)

(N = 132)

(N = 63)

(N = 31)

(N = 58)

Age at examination

-0.0229428

0.0005514

-0.0123411

0.0664692b

0.0188255

0.0099428

Percent men

-2.136381

-0.2987655

0.3672128

1.512528

-1.614856

-0.4417779

Disease duration

-0.0117009

0.1112542b

0.0342322

0.0841153b

-0.0535196

-0.0164648

Symptom assessment (ref = Self-report symptom)c

Clinical exam/diagnosis

-0.7969928b

N/A

-0.2571586

N/A

N/A

0.4188744

Structured questionnaire

-0.6081471b

0.4599401

0.0039112

0.0728903

N/A

0.5019682

Smell test

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1.580798b

N/A

Continent (ref = North America)

Europe

0.2150189

0.1268662

0.4494578b

-0.152538

0.1744257

-0.0748215

Asia

-0.7000721

1.174114b

0.9805807b

-0.292603

-0.5923392

-0.3263885

 

Other

0.051124

0.6902194

0.6824674b

0.2518004

-0.018769

-0.1487844

aCorrelation coefficients were presented.

bP < 0.05.

cMethods with fewer than 5 studies were not included in the analyses.

Both visual inspections of the funnel plots and statistical tests (data not shown) suggest publication bias for studies that examined the prevalence of anxiety, contipation, depression, and EDS among cases after PD diagnosis, and for depression and hyposmia among controls (Egger test: P < 0.05). The positive Egger’s bias coefficients for these studies suggest that more extreme estimates from smaller studies were more likely to be published than less extreme estimates.

Prevalence of symptoms prior to diagnoses

Few studies have data on NMS prior to PD diagnosis and most assessed symptoms via self-report. Despite these limitations, it is clear that the prevalence of these symptoms prior to PD diagnosis was higher among future PD cases than controls. The differences were, however, smaller than post-diagnosis data. Once again, hyposmia was the most prevalent, 35.5% in future cases versus 17.4% in controls, followed by depression (23.0% vs. 14.9%), constipation (20.0% vs. 9.3%), anxiety (18.8% vs. 10.5%), and RBD (17.9% for cases). Because only one study assessed EDS prior to PD diagnosis or RBD among controls, no summary estimates were calculated. Like the post-diagnosis analyses, significant study heterogeneities were observed across symptoms (cases: I 2  = 79.1% to 96.4%, all P < 0.05; controls: I 2  = 80.6% to 99.1%, P <0.01) (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Meta-analysis of the prevalence of selected non-motor symptoms prior to PD diagnosis.

Discussion

It is well-known that NMS are common among PD patients; however, the exact prevalence and incidence are yet to be defined. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive meta-analysis on the prevalence of multiple important NMS before and after PD diagnosis. A previous meta-analysis examined NMS and other factors in relation to PD risk [24]; however, it provided no data on symptom prevalence. The goal of our analysis was to survey available data and to provide preliminary prevalence estimates for future research on premotor symptoms of PD. As there are limited number of studies that were specifically designed to assess the prevalence of these symptoms, particularly prior to diagnosis, and among available studies, there are substantial heterogeneities in study population and symptom assessment, we have decided to be inclusive rather than exclusive in the selection of eligible studies.

Understanding the prevalence of NMS among PD patients is important in multiple ways. NMS adversely affect the quality of life of PD patients. Depression and sleep disturbances are often cited as the most important determinants of the health-related quality of life among PD patients [1, 25]. A good understanding of the prevalence of these symptoms allows for more comprehensive assessments of disease burden and better clinical managements. Some NMS, like the ones we analyzed, may precede PD diagnosis by years. Research on these symptoms may help us better define at-risk populations in our search for disease modifying interventions [26]. For example, several recent studies were carried out to examine whether hyposmia alone or with other NMS and neuro-biomarkers might help identify PD earlier than clinical diagnosis [2729]. Equally important, this may also provide an unprecedented opportunity to investigate the origin and early etiology of PD as exemplified by the dual-hit hypothesis [30, 31]. These prodromal symptoms may serve as intermediate phenotypes to investigate risk factors that contribute to early PD development and to later conversion from intermediate phenotypes to clinical PD [15]. This research has been pioneered by experimental studies [31] and clinical investigations among RBD patients [32], and future population-based studies will be needed.

Our analyses systematically evaluated the prevalence of selected NMS before and after PD diagnosis. We clearly demonstrated that each of these symptoms affected at least a third of PD patients. Of these, hyposmia was the most prevalent, affecting 76% of PD patients after diagnosis and 36% prior to diagnosis. Although not directly comparable, all NMS in patients were about twice as prevalent after diagnosis as prior to diagnosis. This is consistent with the Braak hypothesis that the Lewy pathology is cumulative in PD [14] and also with the progressive nature of PD development. The prevalence of these symptoms was clearly higher in cases than in controls. After diagnosis, the largest difference was found for RBD, followed by hyposmia, EDS, and constipation, each about 3–5 times more prevalent among cases than among controls. Prior to diagnosis, the difference is however smaller, generally less than 2-fold. This, together with the relative high prevalence of symptoms among controls, supports the notion that most of these NMS are not specific; therefore future studies should focus on understanding patterns of multiple NMS and how they are related to future PD development [15, 33]. Notably, population data on prodromal PD are fairly limited and little data exist on the prevalence of EDS and RBD prior to PD diagnosis. Previous clinical-based studies suggest that RBD is the most specific prodromal symptom for PD [34], and this issue should be further evaluated in population-based studies.

It is not surprising that there are substantial heterogeneities across studies given the large variability in symptom definition, assessment methods, and patient characteristics. Many of the studies assessed symptoms via self-reports, which may be very useful to screen large populations cost-effectively but are not ideal for estimating prevalence. We found in the meta-regression analysis that self-reports might have underestimated the prevalence of hyposmia, but overestimated that for anxiety. This suggests that hyposmia are under-recognized by the elderly and objective means are needed to screen for smell deficit, such as the Sniffin’ Stick test [35] or the Brief Smell Identification Test [36]. Interestingly, with a few exceptions, we did not identify age and disease duration as major contributors to study heterogenity. This may relate to the fact that we analyzed aggregated data across studies, and this issue could be better investigated in large studies with indivdiual data.

In non-PD literature, prevalence data for the general population are widely available on depression, anxiety, and to a lesser extent, on constipation and hyposmia. Comparing our data directly with those is difficult, in part due to differences in study design, population characteristics, symptom assessment, and definitions of symptom prevalence. With these caveats, our data for controls are largely consistent with reports from several recent meta-analyses on constipation [37], depression [38], and anxiety [38] in general elderly populations. To the best of our knowledge, no other meta-analysis has been conducted on hyposmia. Our analyses showed that approximately 19% of the elderly population free of PD had hyposmia, which was also comparable to studies in the general older population [39]. While little data have been published on EDS and RBD outside the PD literature, our meta-analysis suggests that these symptoms may affect 7-10% of the elderly without PD.

Our analyses have several limitations. We limited our search to PubMed and publications in English and therefore might have missed a small number of relevant publications. Most studies were not originally designed to evaluate the prevalence of NMS, and there were substantial heterogeneities in the source population, study design, sample size, and symptom assessment. Nevertheless, we conducted several sensitivity analyses for symptoms after disease diagnosis and obtained similar results. Further, few studies have data prior to PD diagnosis, and therefore the corresponding estimates may not be as stable as those for post-diagnostic prevalence. Moreover, it is important to understand the temporal relationship of NMS to PD, particularly in the prodromal stage. However, nearly all studies had only cross-sectional measurements, and prospective investigations with repeated assessments are largely lacking. Finally, few previous studies examined the occurrence of multiple symptoms, which allows for a more comprehensive assessment of NMS burden among PD patients. Such assessment in the prodromal stage of PD may further help to better identify populations at risk despite that individual NMS are mostly not specific to PD [15].

Despite these limitations, our meta-analysis provided summary estimates of NMS among PD before and after diagnosis. Further prospective research is needed to examine the presence of multiple symptoms and their temporal relationships to PD to better understand the etiology and natural history of NMS and PD.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms. Sandra Chambers, Erin Knight, and Stephanie Holmgren of the NIEHS library for conducting literature search.

Funding

The study was supported by the intramural research program of the NIH, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Z01-ES-101986).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
(2)
Social & Scientific Systems, Inc
(3)
Departments of Neurology, Radiology, Neurosurgery, Pharmacology, & Kinesiology, Pennsylvania State University-Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
(4)
Biostatistics Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

References

  1. Soh SE, Morris ME, McGinley JL: Determinants of health-related quality of life in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2011,17(1):1–9. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2010.08.012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lang AE: A critical appraisal of the premotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease: potential usefulness in early diagnosis and design of neuroprotective trials. Mov Disord 2011,26(5):775–83. 10.1002/mds.23609View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ross GW, Petrovitch H, Abbott RD, Tanner CM, Popper J, Masaki K, et al.: Association of olfactory dysfunction with risk for future Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol 2008,63(2):167–73. 10.1002/ana.21291View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Abbott RD, Ross GW, Petrovitch H, Tanner CM, Davis DG, Masaki KH, et al.: Bowel movement frequency in late-life and incidental Lewy bodies. Mov Disord 2007,22(11):1581–6. 10.1002/mds.21560View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Savica R, Carlin JM, Grossardt BR, Bower JH, Ahlskog JE, Maraganore DM, et al.: Medical records documentation of constipation preceding Parkinson disease: A case–control study. Neurology 2009,73(21):1752–8. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c34af5View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gao X, Chen H, Schwarzschild MA, Ascherio A: A prospective study of bowel movement frequency and risk of Parkinson's disease. Am J Epidemiol 2011,174(5):546–51. 10.1093/aje/kwr119View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bower JH, Grossardt BR, Maraganore DM, Ahlskog JE, Colligan RC, Geda YE, et al.: Anxious personality predicts an increased risk of Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2010,25(13):2105–13. 10.1002/mds.23230View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fang F, Xu Q, Park Y, Huang X, Hollenbeck A, Blair A, et al.: Depression and the subsequent risk of Parkinson's disease in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Mov Disord 2010,25(9):1157–62. 10.1002/mds.23092View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Weisskopf MG, Chen H, Schwarzschild MA, Kawachi I, Ascherio A: Prospective study of phobic anxiety and risk of Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2003,18(6):646–51. 10.1002/mds.10425View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Claassen DO, Josephs KA, Ahlskog JE, Silber MH, Tippmann-Peikert M, Boeve BF: REM sleep behavior disorder preceding other aspects of synucleinopathies by up to half a century. Neurology 2010,75(6):494–9. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ec7facView ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Postuma RB, Gagnon JF, Vendette M, Fantini ML, Massicotte-Marquez J, Montplaisir J: Quantifying the risk of neurodegenerative disease in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder. Neurology 2009,72(15):1296–300. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000340980.19702.6eView ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Abbott RD, Ross GW, White LR, Tanner CM, Masaki KH, Nelson JS, et al.: Excessive daytime sleepiness and subsequent development of Parkinson disease. Neurology 2005,65(9):1442–6. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000183056.89590.0dView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gao J, Huang X, Park Y, Hollenback A, Blair A, Schatzkin A, et al.: Daytime napping, nighttime sleeping, and Parkinson disease. Am J Epidemiol 2011,173(9):1032–8. 10.1093/aje/kwq478View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Braak H, Bohl JR, Müller CM, Rüb U, de Vos RAI, Tredici KD: Stanley Fahn Lecture 2005: The staging procedure for the inclusion body pathology associated with sporadic Parkinson's disease reconsidered. Movement Disorders 2006,21(12):2042–51. 10.1002/mds.21065View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen H, Burton EA, Ross GW, Huang X, Savica R, Abbot R, et al.: Research on the Premotor Symptoms of Parkinson's Disease: Clinical and Etiological Implications. Environ Health Perspect 2013,121(11–12):1245–52.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Barone P, Antonini A, Colosimo C, Marconi R, Morgante L, Avarello TP, et al.: The PRIAMO study: A multicenter assessment of nonmotor symptoms and their impact on quality of life in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2009,24(11):1641–9. 10.1002/mds.22643View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Herting B, Schulze S, Reichmann H, Haehner A, Hummel T: A longitudinal study of olfactory function in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. J Neurol 2008,255(3):367–70. 10.1007/s00415-008-0665-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Herlofson K, Ongre SO, Enger LK, Tysnes OB, Larsen JP: Fatigue in early Parkinson's disease. Minor inconvenience or major distress? Eur J Neurol 2012,19(7):963–8. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03663.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gupta A, Bhatia S: Psychological functioning in patients with Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2000,6(3):185–90. 10.1016/S1353-8020(00)00010-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chew V: Point Estimation of the Parameter of the Binomial Distribution. The American Statistician 1971,25(5):47–50.Google Scholar
  21. Lipsey MW, Wilson DB: Practical Meta-Analysis. London: SAGE Publicaitons; 2000.Google Scholar
  22. Higgins JP, Thompson SG: Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002,21(11):1539–58. 10.1002/sim.1186View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Bmj 1997,315(7109):629–34. 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Noyce AJ, Bestwick JP, Silveira-Moriyama L, Hawkes CH, Giovanni G, Lees AJ, et al.: Meta-analysis of early nonmotor features and risk factors for Parkinson disease. Ann Neurol 2012,72(6):893–901. 10.1002/ana.23687View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Duncan GW, Khoo TK, Yarnall AJ, O’Brien JT, Coleman SY, Brooks DJ, et al.: Health-related quality of life in early Parkinson's disease: The impact of nonmotor symptoms. Mov Disord 2013,29(2):195–202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Berg D, Marek K, Ross GW, Poewe W: Defining at-risk populations for Parkinson's disease: lessons from ongoing studies. Mov Disord 2012,27(5):656–65. 10.1002/mds.24985View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Siderowf A, Jennings D, Eberly S, Oakes D, Hawkins KA, Ascherio A, et al.: Impaired olfaction and other prodromal features in the Parkinson At-Risk Syndrome Study. Mov Disord 2012,27(3):406–12. 10.1002/mds.24892View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Berg D, Godau J, Seppi K, Behnke S, Liepelt-Scarfone I, Lerche S, et al.: The PRIPS study: screening battery for subjects at risk for Parkinson's disease. Eur J Neurol 2013,20(1):102–8. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03798.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gaenslen A, Wurster I, Brockmann K, Huber H, Godau J, Faust B, et al.: Prodromal features for Parkinson's disease--baseline data from the TREND study. Eur J Neurol 2014,21(5):766–72. 10.1111/ene.12382View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hawkes CH, Del Tredici K, Braak H: Parkinson's disease: the dual hit theory revisited. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009, 1170:615–22. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04365.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Reichmann H: View point: Etiology in Parkinson's disease. Dual hit or spreading intoxication. J Neurol Sci 2011,310(1–2):9–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Postuma RB, Montplaisir JY, Pelletier A, Dauvilliers Y, Oertel W, Iranzo A, et al.: Environmental risk factors for REM sleep behavior disorder: a multicenter case–control study. Neurology 2012,79(5):428–34. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31825dd383View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Chen H, Huang X, Guo X, Peddada S: Individual and joint prevalence of three nonmotor symptoms of PD in the US general population. Mov Disord 2014,29(10):1316–9. 10.1002/mds.25950View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Postuma RB, Gagnon JF, Montplaisir JY: REM sleep behavior disorder: from dreams to neurodegeneration. Neurobiol Dis 2012,46(3):553–8. 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.10.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hummel T, Konnerth CG, Rosenheim K, Kobal G: Screening of olfactory function with a four-minute odor identification test: reliability, normative data, and investigations in patients with olfactory loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001,110(10):976–81. 10.1177/000348940111001015View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Doty RL, Marcus A, Lee WW: Development of the 12-item Cross-Cultural Smell Identification Test (CC-SIT). Laryngoscope 1996,106(3 Pt 1):353–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Suares NC, Ford AC: Prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic idiopathic constipation in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2011,106(9):1582–91. 10.1038/ajg.2011.164View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Volkert J, Schulz H, Harter M, Wlodarczyk O, Andreas S: The prevalence of mental disorders in older people in Western countries - a meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev 2013,12(1):339–53. 10.1016/j.arr.2012.09.004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Murphy C, Schubert CR, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Nondahl DM: Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults. Jama 2002,288(18):2307–12. 10.1001/jama.288.18.2307View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement