Open Access

Role of BACE1 in Alzheimer’s synaptic function

Translational Neurodegeneration20176:23

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40035-017-0093-5

Received: 23 June 2017

Accepted: 15 August 2017

Published: 30 August 2017

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common age-dependent disease of dementia, and there is currently no cure available. This hallmark pathologies of AD are the presence of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. Although the exact etiology of AD remains a mystery, studies over the past 30 have shown that abnormal generation or accumulation of β-amyloid peptides (Aβ) is likely to be a predominant early event in AD pathological development. Aβ is generated from amyloid precursor protein (APP) via proteolytic cleavage by β-site APP cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1). Chemical inhibition of BACE1 has been shown to reduce Aβ in animal studies and in human trials. While BACE1 inhibitors are currently being tested in clinical trials to treat AD patients, it is highly important to understand whether BACE1 inhibition will significantly impact cognitive functions in AD patients. This review summarizes the recent studies on BACE1 synaptic functions. This knowledge will help to guide the proper use of BACE1 inhibitors in AD therapy.

Keywords

Amyloid depositionβ-amyloid peptideBACE1SecretaseBACE1 substratesSynaptic functions

Background

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is an age-dependent chronic neurodegenerative disease that is characterized by the presence of amyloid deposition, neurofibrillary tangles, synaptic dysfunction, and neuronal cell death [1, 2]. The common effector of this neurodegenerative process is the excessive production or accumulation of β-amyloid (Aβ), which has several deleterious effects on synaptic activity [3, 4]. For over 30 years, amyloid precursor protein (APP) has been a main target for investigating the progression of AD. Aβ is generated from APP through proteolysis in a two-step process: β-secretase, known as β-site APP cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1), initiates the cleavage of APP to release the membrane-anchored C-terminal fragment, and then γ-secretase subsequently cleaves this fragment to excise Aβ in 40–43 amino acid sequences [5]. These sequences form hydrophobic aggregates, which constitute the senile plaques in AD. Risk factors associated with development of AD pathology involve genetic predisposition (familial early-onset forms), allele forms of apolipoprotein E (i.e, ApoE-4 has the strongest impact), age, lifestyle, and converging evidence which suggests that many newly identified mutations are linked to altered APP processing leading to amyloidogenic pathogenesis [6, 7].

BACE1 has been an important target for therapeutic intervention because of its indispensable role in the generation of Aβ [812]. However, BACE1 also functions as a housekeeping enzyme and is involved in the processing of many other proteins that are responsible for proper functioning of neuronal tissue [Fig. 1]. Hence, complete removal of BACE1 enzymatic activity could potentially cause unwanted side effects. The most relevant of these is the effect of BACE1 on synaptic functions, which are related to AD pathology. To this end, this review aims to summarize our knowledge associated with the beneficial and detrimental effects of BACE1 in synaptic functions so that we can have a clearer understanding of the synaptic regulation by BACE1. This understanding will ultimately be beneficial for finding an optimally effective strategy to provide BACE1 drugs to AD patients.
Fig. 1

APP and non-APP BACE1 substrates and their effects on synaptic transmisssion

Pathophysiology of AD and synaptic deficiencies

AD, along with stroke, is the third most common disease affecting the US population, afflicting ~7% of individuals ages 65–74, 53% at ages 75–84, and 40% at ages 85 and older, respectively [13]. Worldwide, it affects nearly 44 million people and is one of major causes of age-dependent disability [14]. With no definitive cure or treatment course in sight, the global cost of Alzheimer’s and dementia is estimated to be $605 billion. The pathological characteristics of AD present as cortical atrophy, neuro-inflammation, neuronal cell death, loss of synaptic connections, and the accumulation of neurofibrillary tangles and senile plaques [15].

The exact cause of AD is still unknown; however, genetic mutations in APP, presenilin 1 (PS1), or presenilin 2 (PS2) have been shown to promote the formation of amyloid plaques, which are a hallmark of AD pathology [16, 17]. The apolipoprotein E (ApoE) gene encodes three isoforms: ApoE2, ApoE3, and ApoE4. The ApoE4 isoform is identified as a genetic risk factor for late-onset AD because of its impact on the clearance of Aβ and amyloid deposition [1821]. ApoE can also impact Aβ accumulation through its receptor, as ApoE receptor knockout mice have shown to increase Aß accumulation due to reduced clearance [22].

On the other hand, some AD risk genes are also involved in synaptic plasticity; loss of synaptic function in AD is evident long before any substantial loss of neurons [23]. PS1 is a component in the synaptic junction [24] and has been shown to regulate calcium homeostasis and the release of certain neurotransmitters [2528]. An AD mouse model with a PS1 mutation also exhibits disruption in homeostatic scaling, a mechanism for preventing groups of neurons from altering their firing patterns too drastically in response to changes in the environment [29]. ApoE may also regulate synaptic functions through its receptor, ApoE receptor 2 (ApoER2), which is known to promote synaptic plasticity and memory formation in mice [30]. Toxic soluble Aß can also be directly cleared from the synapse via ApoE receptors [31]. In mouse models, ApoER2 increases the number of dendritic spines and synapses and stabilizes them by regulating the assembly of a complex of proteins involved in synaptic terminals across neurons, a process which is important for learning and memory [32]. In spite of the association of these proteins with synaptic functions, the effect of these genetic mutations on AD cognitive dysfunction remains to be fully established.

Growing numbers of studies suggest that Aβ is likely to be the early effector molecule in AD cognitive dysfunction [see reviews [4, 33, 34]. Although the precise biochemical mechanisms underlying how variously assembled forms of Aβ cause synaptic dysfunction remain to be determined, biochemical and morphological studies have shown accumulation of Aβ at the synaptic terminals [35, 36]. This local accumulation is likely attributable to the fact that BACE1 initiates the generation of Aβ at the synaptic terminals [37]. Elevated levels of BCE1 have been directly correlated with Aβ-induced pathology in AD brains [3840]. Increased amyloidogenic processing at the expense of nonamyloidogenic processing promotes Aβ accumulation at synapses in AD.

On the other hand, many scaffolding proteins like mGluR proteins, Shank, Homer, and postsynaptic density 95 (PSD95) are known to form complexes at synaptic terminals, and Aβ accumulation at synaptic terminals leads to disruption of these scaffolding protein interactions, resulting in morphological and physiological alterations such as thinning of the synaptic terminals, alteration in the molecular composition of the PSD, and disruption of synaptic signaling pathways [4145]. Hence, abnormal accumulation of Aβ is largely considered to be toxic to synaptic functions at multiple levels.

Effects of BACE1 on synaptic functions

BACE1 is indispensable for the generation of Aβ, as germline deletion of the BACE1 gene abolishes the generation of Aβ [4648]. BACE1 is therefore a molecule that is directly linked to synaptic functions, at least through its effects on Aβ accumulation in cells and synapses. BACE1 is predominantly expressed in brain and is richly expressed by neurons [37, 49, 50]. Accumulation of BACE1 is observed in normal and dystrophic presynaptic terminals surrounding amyloid plaques in brains of AD mouse models and patients, likely causing a vicious cycle by increasing Aβ production near synapses. Because of this, inhibition of BACE1 is logically viewed to reduce Aβ-mediated synaptic dysfunctions and to be potentially beneficial to AD patients. Hence, BACE1 inhibitors are being developed and tested for treating AD patients [51, 52].

However, whether BACE1 inhibition causes any unwanted effects on synaptic function has also attracted significant attention. This knowledge is critical for understanding the efficacy of BACE1 inhibitors in AD patients. It has been shown that BACE1 is normally expressed in broad brain regions, with rich expression by hippocampal granule cells. BACE1 has been shown to play a critical role in synaptic development and plasticity through cleavage of its various substrates [51, 53, 54]. The effects of BACE1 on synaptic functions are likely to be through multiple mechanisms, as discussed below.
  1. 1.

    BACE1 deficiency alters synaptic plasticity in relation to APP cleavage: Long-term changes in the strength of synaptic transmission are the basis of memory formation. Any correlated activity in the pre- and postsynaptic compartments of a synapse in a repeated pattern either strengthens synaptic connections (long term potentiation; LTP) or conversely weakens them (long term depression; LTD) [55]. High levels of Aβ disturbs the balance of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in synaptic boutons and can interfere with pre- and postsynaptic function, presumably by affecting NMDARs, presynaptic P/Q type Ca2+ channels, and/or α7-nAChRs, and thus interrupting subsequent Ca2+ signaling and leading to altered synaptic function [56].

    Mice lacking the BACE1 gene show no β-secretase activity and thus have nearly abolished Aβ (Aβ40 and Aβ42) production in the brain compared to wild-type controls. A deletion of the BACE1 gene in mouse models of AD was able to rescue hippocampal-dependent memory deficits resulting from Aβ accumulation [49] and to ameliorate impaired hippocampal cholinergic regulation of neuronal excitability [57]. Alternatively, BACE1 cleavage of APP will also produce a 99-amino acid C-terminal fragment, referred to as βAPPc or APP-C99. This βAPPc has been shown to impair synaptic functions [58]. BACE1 deficiency benefits AD patients likely through reducing this toxic fragment. These findings implicate that BACE1 may be a good therapeutic target for treating AD [59, 60].

    However, recent research progress may suggest otherwise. Since BACE1 has normal physiological functions in synaptic transmission and plasticity in CA1 region of hippocampus, BACE1-null mice displays deficits in both synaptic transmission and plasticity at the hippocampal Schaffer collateral to CA1 synapses [49, 61]. There is a significant increase in the pair pulse ratio (PPF) in BACE1-null mice when compared to wild-type [49]. Because changes in PPF ratio have been attributed to alterations in presynaptic release probability [62], the increased PPF ratio seen in BACE1-null mice may indicate a deficit in presynaptic release [49]. Consistently, BACE1-null mice display altered synaptic plasticity in CA1 and CA3 regions [49, 63]. In addition to presynaptic alterations, changes in PPF ratio can also be attributed to postsynaptic modifications, such as in the subunit composition of AMPA receptors (AMPARs) [64]. Physiological concentrations of Aβ (in pM range) have been shown to facilitate synaptic plasticity [65] and BACE1 deficiency will cause a remarkable reduction in Aβ. Such a loss of physiological levels of Aβ may also lead to synaptic deficits.

     
  2. 2.

    BACE1 deficiency alters synaptic plasticity in relation to neuregulin-1 cleavage: An alternative possibility is that the synaptic dysfunctions in BACE1-null mice may arise from abnormal processing of substrates other than APP, i.e., neuregulin-1 (Nrg1) [6668]. Nrg1 has a plethora of functions in the central and peripheral nervous systems, which include regulation of myelination, radial and tangential neuronal migration of glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons, and synaptic plasticity [69]. To exert these functions, Nrg1 is required to be cleaved by membrane-anchored proteases, and BACE1 is one such protease. BACE1 deficiency reduces Nrg1 signaling activity and causes defects in these functions as manifested in BACE1-null mice [70, 71].

    Many behaviors in animals with Nrg1 mutations exhibit a close resemblance to putative characteristics of schizophrenia, such as impaired pre-pulse inhibition, and spontaneous hyperactivity, which can be reversed by clozapine [72]. Nrg1 and its signaling receptor, the ErbB4 receptor, have been identified as leading candidates for schizophrenia susceptibility genes [73]. It has also been shown that Nrg1-ErbB4 signaling enhances excitatory synapse formation on interneurons and inhibitory synapse formation on pyramidal neurons [74, 75]. Specifically, deletion of ErbB4 from fast-spiking interneurons, such as chandelier and basket cells, has been shown to cause relatively subtle but consistent synaptic defects [74]. Deletion of ErbB4 in interneurons increases miniature excitatory postsynaptic current (mEPSC) frequency and amplitude, but increases miniature inhibitory postsynaptic current frequency in pyramidal neurons [75, 76]. In addition, Nrg1 increases both the number and size of PSD-95 puncta, indicating that Nrg1 stimulates the formation of new synapses and strengthens existing synapses. Nrg1 could also stimulate the stability of PSD-95 in a manner that requires tyrosine kinase activity of ErbB4 [77]. Together, these results suggest that Nrg1 plays a significant role in excitatory synapse development, possibly via stabilizing PSD-95 [76]. By abolishing Nrg1 cleavage to reduce Nrg1-ErbB4 signaling in synapses, BACE1 deficiency likely contributes to synaptic dysfunctions as reported in BACE1-null mice discussed above.

     
  3. 3.

    BACE1 deficiency alters synaptic plasticity in relation to Sez6 cleavage: Another family of proteins, the seizure-related gene 6 (Sez6) and its family member Sez6L, were identified as BACE1 substrates through an unbiased proteomic approach and were recently validated as strong substrates of BACE1 [78]. Sez6 and Sez6-like (Sez6L) are nearly exclusively cleaved by BACE1 and not by other proteases in the brain and are guided by their sub-cellular location and their function. They share an NPxY motif and a phosphotyrosine-binding domain (PTB) with another BACE1 substrate, amyloid precursor protein (APP). In BACE1-null and BACE1/2-double-null mice, a marked reduction in the shedding of Sez6 and Sez6L proteins has been confirmed. Their levels in BACE1-null cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are significantly reduced to ~10% of the wild-type condition. Although the exact molecular functions of Sez6 and Sez6L are not yet fully understood, homology in their protein-binding domains to other cell surface receptors suggests that they may act as receptors at the cell surface [79], as they were originally identified as membrane proteins with five copies of short consensus repeat with a complement C3b/C4b binding site and were seen to be elevated after bursts of neuronal activity [80]. The interaction domains suggest adhesive and/or receptor trafficking functions of these proteins; however, their binding partners are not yet known. Sez-6 is required for normal dendritic arborization of cortical neurons, which is critical for neuronal transfer of information. Its localization along developing and mature dendritic branches and in dendritic spines modulates branch stability. In the absence of Sez-6, mice exhibit short dendrites while cultured cortical neurons display excessive neurite branching. Despite the noticeable effect on branching of dendrites, no obvious effect on an overall growth of the dendritic arbor is reported [81]. Excessive dendritic branching does not always mean a better condition for synapse formation, as studies have found that postsynaptic specializations on these branches (labeled with PSD-95) were dramatically reduced [82]. In the absence of Sez-6, spine numbers are reduced, with reduced excitatory synaptic connectivity between layers II/III and layer V pyramidal neurons in Sez-6-null mice. As spontaneous miniature EPSCs (mEPSCs) or EPSCs with minimal stimulation were not altered, the reduction might be because of uncoupling of pre- and postsynaptic ends of synapses due to altered branching patterns. There is also evidence for reduced synaptic density, punctate staining of PSD-95, and LTP in the frontal cortex of Sez6-null mice. Sez-6 proteins are therefore important for specifying proper dendritic arborization and for development of excitatory synapses on cortical neurons [81]. There is an activity-driven up-regulation of Sez-6 expression after 2 h post-high frequency stimulation [83]. Sez-6 expression levels are highly enriched in brain regions associated with ongoing morphological plasticity, such as the hippocampus and cerebellum in postnatal brain. In Sez-6 deficiency, animals exhibit poor motor coordination and balance, suppressed activity in the open field, reduced anxiety, as well as cognitive deficits. Thus Sez6 protein signaling is critical for excitatory synapse development and function [81] and synaptic circuit refinement [84]. Besides synapse formation and maintenance, Sez6 family members are also expressed and cleaved in lungs and pancreas [79, 85]. Since Sez6 and Sez6L are exclusive substrates of BACE1, they can be used as a direct readout for BACE1 activity in CSF and as a control condition where BACE1 inhibitors can be developed in a substrate-specific manner (for APP) without hampering the physiological actions of BACE1 on other essential proteins like Sez6 that are critical for proper synchronous synaptic transmission.

     
  4. 4.

    BACE1 deficiency alters synaptic plasticity in relation to jagged cleavage: Jagged-1 (Jag1) has been identified as a BACE1 substrate [86] and is known to play important roles in neural development and synaptic functions. Jag1 regulates astrogenesis/neurogenesis via the Notch signaling pathway [8789]. Because of abrogated Jag1 cleavage, BACE1-null mice exhibit increased astrogenesis and reduced neurogenesis due to increased Jag1-Notch interactions [87]. This is consistent with a prior report that astrocytes negatively regulate neurogenesis through the Notch pathway [90]. Although Notch and its ligands are expressed at low levels in the adult brain [91, 92], they are needed for long-term memory, which is dependent on ultra-structural remodeling of synapses. Hence Notch has an important role in the neural plasticity underlying consolidated memory. Loss of Notch function produces memory deficits in Drosophila melanogaster [93] and impairs proper morphology of dendritic spines [91] in the mouse hippocampus. Thus Jag, as a Notch regulator, is important for synaptic plasticity that contributes to memory formation.

    On the other hand, a shift in the balance between neurogenesis and astrogenesis in BACE1-null mice likely contributes to aberrant synaptic transmission. Astrocytes regulate synaptic function and plasticity in close association with synapses [94]. They are involved in synaptogenesis as well as synapse function and elimination. This tight structural and functional partnership between the perisynaptic astrocytic process and the neuronal pre- and postsynaptic structures constitutes the “tripartite synapse” [95]. Astrocyte processes enclose synapses and define functional domains by ensheathing neuronal somas, axons, dendrites, and synapses occupying non overlapping territories, and thus establish gradually independent domains which are also developmentally regulated [96, 97]. This process of segregation, also known as astrocyte tiling, is thought to be regulated by “contact inhibition” between neighboring astrocytes and is crucial for normal functions of the nervous system because, in disease and post-injury conditions, astrocytes lose their tiling ability and display intermingled process morphology [98]. Astrocytes have also been known to regulate glutamatergic postsynaptic strength by increasing the number and stabilizing of AMPAR and NMDAR at the postsynaptic end of synapses [99]. Hence, BACE1 inhibition may impact synaptic functions due to an imbalance in total astrocytes and neurons.

     

Conclusion

Since BACE1 is the rate-limiting enzyme in the amyloid cascade, it is considered to be one of the promising targets for AD therapy. A rare human mutation at the BACE1 cleavage site of APP has been identified, which results in a 40% decrease in Aβ production in vitro, a reduced propensity of Aβ to aggregate, a five- to seven-fold reduced risk of developing AD, and improved cognitive function in elderly subjects without AD [100102]. Hence, BACE1 inhibition is likely to be beneficial to AD patients. However, caution should also be taken considering the role of BACE1 in synaptic plasticity. For example, the BACE1 inhibitor verubecestat (MK-8931) showed great promise in early human and animal trials [103], but a recent announcement that Merck was stopping one of its trials suggested cause for concern. By better understanding the physiological and pathological functions of BACE1, anticipation and possible circumvention of mechanism-based side effects that may arise due to BACE1 inhibition can be accomplished. Decoding molecular mechanisms that underlie AD pathogenesis will help us to develop efficient therapeutic approaches to combat disease progression.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Due to space limitations, not all related studies regarding BACE1 substrates in synaptic functions are cited, but many of these studies were discussed in reviews cited in this article.

Funding

R Yan is supported by grants (MH103942, NS074256 and AG046929) from the National Institutes of Health.

Availability of data and materials

The authors encourages free citation of data or conclusions in this review article.

Authors’ contributions

Both BD and RY wrote this review. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic

References

  1. Musiek ES, Holtzman DM. Three dimensions of the amyloid hypothesis: time, space and ‘wingmen’. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18(6):800–6. doi:10.1038/nn.4018 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Selkoe DJ, Hardy J. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease at 25 years. EMBO Mol Med. 2016;8(6):595–608. doi:10.15252/emmm.201606210 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Malenka RC, Malinow R. Alzheimer's disease: recollection of lost memories. Nature. 2011;469(7328):44–5. doi:10.1038/469044a View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Yan R, Fan Q, Zhou J, Vassar R. Inhibiting BACE1 to reverse synaptic dysfunctions in Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;65:326–40. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.025 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Haass C. Take five--BACE and the gamma-secretase quartet conduct Alzheimer's amyloid beta-peptide generation. EMBO J. 2004;23(3):483–8. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600061 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Karch CM, Cruchaga C, Goate AM. Alzheimer's disease genetics: from the bench to the clinic. Neuron. 2014;83(1):11–26. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.041 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Tanzi RE. The genetics of Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(10) doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a006296
  8. Hussain I, Powell D, Howlett DR, Tew DG, Meek TD, Chapman C, et al. Identification of a novel aspartic protease (asp 2) as beta-secretase. Mol Cell Neurosci. 1999;14(6):419–27. doi:10.1006/mcne.1999.0811 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lin X, Koelsch G, Wu S, Downs D, Dashti A, Tang J. Human aspartic protease memapsin 2 cleaves the beta-secretase site of beta-amyloid precursor protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(4):1456–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Sinha S, Anderson JP, Barbour R, Basi GS, Caccavello R, Davis D, et al. Purification and cloning of amyloid precursor protein beta-secretase from human brain. Nature. 1999;402(6761):537–40. doi:10.1038/990114 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Vassar R, Bennett BD, Babu-Khan S, Kahn S, Mendiaz EA, Denis P, et al. Beta-secretase cleavage of Alzheimer's amyloid precursor protein by the transmembrane aspartic protease BACE. Science. 1999;286(5440):735–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Yan R, Bienkowski MJ, Shuck ME, Miao H, Tory MC, Pauley AM, et al. Membrane-anchored aspartyl protease with Alzheimer's disease beta-secretase activity. Nature. 1999;402(6761):533–7. doi:10.1038/990107 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hebert LE, Scherr PA, Bienias JL, Bennett DA, Evans DA. Alzheimer disease in the US population: prevalence estimates using the 2000 census. Arch Neurol. 2003;60(8):1119–22. doi:10.1001/archneur.60.8.1119 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Alzheimer's A. 2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;12(4):459–509View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Holtzman DM, Morris JC, Goate AM. Alzheimer’s disease: the challenge of the second century. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3(77):77sr71. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3002369 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. De Strooper B, Iwatsubo T, Wolfe MS. Presenilins and gamma-secretase: structure, function, and role in Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(1):a006304. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a006304 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Li Y, Bohm C, Dodd R, Chen F, Qamar S, Schmitt-Ulms G, et al. Structural biology of presenilin 1 complexes. Mol Neurodegener. 2014;9:59. doi:10.1186/1750-1326-9-59 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu CC, Liu CC, Kanekiyo T, Xu H, Bu G. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: risk, mechanisms and therapy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9(2):106–18. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2012.263 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Saunders AM, Schmader K, Breitner JC, Benson MD, Brown WT, Goldfarb L, et al. Apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 allele distributions in late-onset Alzheimer's disease and in other amyloid-forming diseases. Lancet. 1993;342(8873):710–1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Strittmatter WJ, Saunders AM, Schmechel D, Pericak-Vance M, Enghild J, Salvesen GS, Roses AD. Apolipoprotein E: high-avidity binding to beta-amyloid and increased frequency of type 4 allele in late-onset familial Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90(5):1977–81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Holtzman DM, Herz J, Bu G. Apolipoprotein E and apolipoprotein E receptors: normal biology and roles in Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(3):a006312. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a006312 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Shibata M, Yamada S, Kumar SR, Calero M, Bading J, Frangione B, et al. Clearance of Alzheimer's amyloid-ss(1-40) peptide from brain by LDL receptor-related protein-1 at the blood-brain barrier. J Clin Invest. 2000;106(12):1489–99. doi:10.1172/JCI10498 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Selkoe DJ. Alzheimer's disease is a synaptic failure. Science. 2002;298(5594):789–91. doi:10.1126/science.1074069 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Georgakopoulos A, Marambaud P, Efthimiopoulos S, Shioi J, Cui W, Li HC, et al. Presenilin-1 forms complexes with the cadherin/catenin cell-cell adhesion system and is recruited to intercellular and synaptic contacts. Mol Cell. 1999;4(6):893–902.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bezprozvanny I, Hiesinger PR. The synaptic maintenance problem: membrane recycling, Ca2+ homeostasis and late onset degeneration. Mol Neurodegener. 2013;8:23. doi:10.1186/1750-1326-8-23 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Ho A, Shen J. Presenilins in synaptic function and disease. Trends Mol Med. 2011;17(11):617–24. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2011.06.002 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Mattson MP. ER calcium and Alzheimer's disease: in a state of flux. Sci Signal. 2010;3(114):pe10. doi:10.1126/scisignal.3114pe10 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Kazim SF, Iqbal K. Neurotrophic factor small-molecule mimetics mediated neuroregeneration and synaptic repair: emerging therapeutic modality for Alzheimer's disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2016;11(1):50. doi:10.1186/s13024-016-0119-y View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Pratt KG, Zimmerman EC, Cook DG, Sullivan JM. Presenilin 1 regulates homeostatic synaptic scaling through Akt signaling. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14(9):1112–4. doi:10.1038/nn.2893 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Wasser CR, Masiulis I, Durakoglugil MS, Lane-Donovan C, Xian X, Beffert U, et al. Differential splicing and glycosylation of Apoer2 alters synaptic plasticity and fear learning. Sci Signal. 2014;7(353):ra113. doi:10.1126/scisignal.2005438 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Gylys KH, Fein JA, Tan AM, Cole GM. Apolipoprotein E enhances uptake of soluble but not aggregated amyloid-beta protein into synaptic terminals. J Neurochem. 2003;84(6):1442–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Dumanis SB, Cha HJ, Song JM, Trotter JH, Spitzer M, Lee JY, et al. ApoE receptor 2 regulates synapse and dendritic spine formation. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e17203. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017203 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Forner S, Baglietto-Vargas D, Martini AC, Trujillo-Estrada L, LaFerla FM. Synaptic impairment in Alzheimer's disease: a Dysregulated symphony. Trends Neurosci. 2017;40(6):347–57. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2017.04.002 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Tu S, Okamoto S, Lipton SA, Xu H. Oligomeric Abeta-induced synaptic dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2014;9:48. doi:10.1186/1750-1326-9-48 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Audrain M, Fol R, Dutar P, Potier B, Billard JM, Flament J, et al. Alzheimer's disease-like APP processing in wild-type mice identifies synaptic defects as initial steps of disease progression. Mol Neurodegener. 2016;11:5. doi:10.1186/s13024-016-0070-y View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Coleman P, Federoff H, Kurlan R. A focus on the synapse for neuroprotection in Alzheimer disease and other dementias. Neurology. 2004;63(7):1155–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kandalepas PC, Sadleir KR, Eimer WA, Zhao J, Nicholson DA, Vassar R. The Alzheimer's beta-secretase BACE1 localizes to normal presynaptic terminals and to dystrophic presynaptic terminals surrounding amyloid plaques. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;126(3):329–52. doi:10.1007/s00401-013-1152-3 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Fukumoto H, Cheung BS, Hyman BT, Irizarry MC. Beta-secretase protein and activity are increased in the neocortex in Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2002;59(9):1381–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Holsinger RM, McLean CA, Beyreuther K, Masters CL, Evin G. Increased expression of the amyloid precursor beta-secretase in Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol. 2002;51(6):783–6. doi:10.1002/ana.10208 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang LB, Lindholm K, Yan R, Citron M, Xia W, Yang XL, et al. Elevated beta-secretase expression and enzymatic activity detected in sporadic Alzheimer disease. Nat Med. 2003;9(1):3–4. doi:10.1038/nm0103-3 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Almeida CG, Tampellini D, Takahashi RH, Greengard P, Lin MT, Snyder EM, Gouras GK. Beta-amyloid accumulation in APP mutant neurons reduces PSD-95 and GluR1 in synapses. Neurobiol Dis. 2005;20(2):187–98. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2005.02.008 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Roselli F, Hutzler P, Wegerich Y, Livrea P, Almeida OF. Disassembly of shank and homer synaptic clusters is driven by soluble beta-amyloid(1-40) through divergent NMDAR-dependent signalling pathways. PLoS One. 2009;4(6):e6011. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006011 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Roselli F, Tirard M, Lu J, Hutzler P, Lamberti P, Livrea P, et al. Soluble beta-amyloid1-40 induces NMDA-dependent degradation of postsynaptic density-95 at glutamatergic synapses. J Neurosci. 2005;25(48):11061–70. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3034-05.2005 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang LW, Berry-Kravis E, Hagerman RJ. Fragile X: leading the way for targeted treatments in autism. Neurotherapeutics. 2010;7(3):264–74. doi:10.1016/j.nurt.2010.05.005 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Golovyashkina N, Penazzi L, Ballatore C, Smith AB 3rd, Bakota L, Brandt R. Region-specific dendritic simplification induced by Abeta, mediated by tau via dysregulation of microtubule dynamics: a mechanistic distinct event from other neurodegenerative processes. Mol Neurodegener. 2015;10:60. doi:10.1186/s13024-015-0049-0 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Cai H, Wang Y, McCarthy D, Wen H, Borchelt DR, Price DL, Wong PC. BACE1 is the major beta-secretase for generation of Abeta peptides by neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4(3):233–4. doi:10.1038/85064 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Luo Y, Bolon B, Kahn S, Bennett BD, Babu-Khan S, Denis P, et al. Mice deficient in BACE1, the Alzheimer's beta-secretase, have normal phenotype and abolished beta-amyloid generation. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4(3):231–2. doi:10.1038/85059 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Roberds SL, Anderson J, Basi G, Bienkowski MJ, Branstetter DG, Chen KS, McConlogue L. BACE knockout mice are healthy despite lacking the primary beta-secretase activity in brain: implications for Alzheimer's disease therapeutics. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10(12):1317–1324.Google Scholar
  49. Laird FM, Cai H, Savonenko AV, Farah MH, He K, Melnikova T, et al. BACE1, a major determinant of selective vulnerability of the brain to amyloid-beta amyloidogenesis, is essential for cognitive, emotional, and synaptic functions. J Neurosci. 2005;25(50):11693–709. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2766-05.2005 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhao J, Fu Y, Yasvoina M, Shao P, Hitt B, O'Connor T, et al. Beta-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1 levels become elevated in neurons around amyloid plaques: implications for Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis. J Neurosci. 2007;27(14):3639–49. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4396-06.2007 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Vassar R, Kuhn PH, Haass C, Kennedy ME, Rajendran L, Wong PC, Lichtenthaler SF. Function, therapeutic potential and cell biology of BACE proteases: current status and future prospects. J Neurochem. 2014;130(1):4–28. doi:10.1111/jnc.12715 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Yan R. Stepping closer to treating Alzheimer's disease patients with BACE1 inhibitor drugs. Transl Neurodegener. 2016;5:13. doi:10.1186/s40035-016-0061-5 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Yan R. Physiological functions of the beta-site Amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1 and 2. Front Mol Neurosci. 2017;10:97. doi:10.3389/fnmol.2017.00097 PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Yan R, Vassar R. Targeting the beta secretase BACE1 for Alzheimer's disease therapy. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(3):319–29. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70276-X View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Morris RG. D.O. Hebb: the Organization of Behavior, Wiley: New York; 1949. Brain Res Bull. 1999;50(5–6):437.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang H, Megill A, Wong PC, Kirkwood A, Lee HK. Postsynaptic target specific synaptic dysfunctions in the CA3 area of BACE1 knockout mice. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92279. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092279 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Ohno M, Sametsky EA, Younkin LH, Oakley H, Younkin SG, Citron M, et al. BACE1 deficiency rescues memory deficits and cholinergic dysfunction in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Neuron. 2004;41(1):27–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Tamayev R, Matsuda S, Arancio O, D'Adamio L. Beta- but not gamma-secretase proteolysis of APP causes synaptic and memory deficits in a mouse model of dementia. EMBO Mol Med. 2012;4(3):171–9. doi:10.1002/emmm.201100195 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Citron M. Strategies for disease modification in Alzheimer's disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5(9):677–85. doi:10.1038/nrn1495 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Vassar R. Beta-secretase (BACE) as a drug target for Alzheimer's disease. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002;54(12):1589–602.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Dominguez D, Tournoy J, Hartmann D, Huth T, Cryns K, Deforce S, et al. Phenotypic and biochemical analyses of BACE1- and BACE2-deficient mice. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(35):30797–806. doi:10.1074/jbc.M505249200 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Manabe T, Wyllie DJ, Perkel DJ, Nicoll RA. Modulation of synaptic transmission and long-term potentiation: effects on paired pulse facilitation and EPSC variance in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. J Neurophysiol. 1993;70(4):1451–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang H, Song L, Laird F, Wong PC, Lee HK. BACE1 knock-outs display deficits in activity-dependent potentiation of synaptic transmission at mossy fiber to CA3 synapses in the hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2008;28(35):8677–81. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2440-08.2008 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Rozov A, Zilberter Y, Wollmuth LP, Burnashev N. Facilitation of currents through rat Ca2+−permeable AMPA receptor channels by activity-dependent relief from polyamine block. J Physiol. 1998;511(Pt 2):361–77.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Puzzo D, Privitera L, Leznik E, Fa M, Staniszewski A, Palmeri A, Arancio O. Picomolar amyloid-beta positively modulates synaptic plasticity and memory in hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2008;28(53):14537–45. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2692-08.2008 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Hu X, Fan Q, Hou H, Yan R. Neurological dysfunctions associated with altered BACE1-dependent Neuregulin-1 signaling. J Neurochem. 2016;136(2):234–49. doi:10.1111/jnc.13395 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Fleck D, Garratt AN, Haass C, Willem M. BACE1 dependent neuregulin processing: review. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012;9(2):178–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Savonenko AV, Melnikova T, Laird FM, Stewart KA, Price DL, Wong PC. Alteration of BACE1-dependent NRG1/ErbB4 signaling and schizophrenia-like phenotypes in BACE1-null mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(14):5585–90. doi:10.1073/pnas.0710373105 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Mei L, Nave KA. Neuregulin-ERBB signaling in the nervous system and neuropsychiatric diseases. Neuron. 2014;83(1):27–49. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.06.007 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Hu X, Hicks CW, He W, Wong P, Macklin WB, Trapp BD, Yan R. Bace1 modulates myelination in the central and peripheral nervous system. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9(12):1520–5. doi:10.1038/nn1797 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Fleck D, van Bebber F, Colombo A, Galante C, Schwenk BM, Rabe L, et al. Dual cleavage of neuregulin 1 type III by BACE1 and ADAM17 liberates its EGF-like domain and allows paracrine signaling. J Neurosci. 2013;33(18):7856–69. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3372-12.2013 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Stefansson H, Sigurdsson E, Steinthorsdottir V, Bjornsdottir S, Sigmundsson T, Ghosh S, et al. Neuregulin 1 and susceptibility to schizophrenia. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71(4):877–92. doi:10.1086/342734 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Harrison PJ, Law AJ. Neuregulin 1 and schizophrenia: genetics, gene expression, and neurobiology. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;60(2):132–40. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.11.002 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Del Pino I, Garcia-Frigola C, Dehorter N, Brotons-Mas JR, Alvarez-Salvado E, Martinez de Lagran M, et al. Erbb4 deletion from fast-spiking interneurons causes schizophrenia-like phenotypes. Neuron. 2013;79(6):1152–68. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.010 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Fazzari P, Paternain AV, Valiente M, Pla R, Lujan R, Lloyd K, et al. Control of cortical GABA circuitry development by Nrg1 and ErbB4 signalling. Nature. 2010;464(7293):1376–80. doi:10.1038/nature08928 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Ting AK, Chen Y, Wen L, Yin DM, Shen C, Tao Y, et al. Neuregulin 1 promotes excitatory synapse development and function in GABAergic interneurons. J Neurosci. 2011;31(1):15–25. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2538-10.2011 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Munro KM, Nash A, Pigoni M, Lichtenthaler SF, Gunnersen JM. Functions of the Alzheimer's disease protease BACE1 at the synapse in the central nervous system. J Mol Neurosci. 2016;60(3):305–15. doi:10.1007/s12031-016-0800-1 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Kuhn PH, Koroniak K, Hogl S, Colombo A, Zeitschel U, Willem M, et al. Secretome protein enrichment identifies physiological BACE1 protease substrates in neurons. EMBO J. 2012;31(14):3157–68. doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.173 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  79. Pigoni M, Wanngren J, Kuhn PH, Munro KM, Gunnersen JM, Takeshima H, et al. Seizure protein 6 and its homolog seizure 6-like protein are physiological substrates of BACE1 in neurons. Mol Neurodegener. 2016;11(1):67. doi:10.1186/s13024-016-0134-z View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Shimizu-Nishikawa K, Kajiwara K, Kimura M, Katsuki M, Sugaya E. Cloning and expression of SEZ-6, a brain-specific and seizure-related cDNA. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1995;28(2):201–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Gunnersen JM, Kim MH, Fuller SJ, De Silva M, Britto JM, Hammond VE, et al. Sez-6 proteins affect dendritic arborization patterns and excitability of cortical pyramidal neurons. Neuron. 2007;56(4):621–39. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.018 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Quitsch A, Berhorster K, Liew CW, Richter D, Kreienkamp HJ. Postsynaptic shank antagonizes dendrite branching induced by the leucine-rich repeat protein Densin-180. J Neurosci. 2005;25(2):479–87. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2699-04.2005 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Havik B, Rokke H, Dagyte G, Stavrum AK, Bramham CR, Steen VM. Synaptic activity-induced global gene expression patterns in the dentate gyrus of adult behaving rats: induction of immunity-linked genes. Neuroscience. 2007;148(4):925–36. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.07.024 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Miyazaki T, Hashimoto K, Uda A, Sakagami H, Nakamura Y, Saito SY, Takeshima H. Disturbance of cerebellar synaptic maturation in mutant mice lacking BSRPs, a novel brain-specific receptor-like protein family. FEBS Lett. 2006;580(17):4057–4064. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2006.06.043.
  85. Stutzer I, Selevsek N, Esterhazy D, Schmidt A, Aebersold R, & Stoffel M. Systematic proteomic analysis identifies beta-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 2 and 1 (BACE2 and BACE1) substrates in pancreatic beta-cells. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(15):10536–10547. doi:10.1074/jbc.M112.444703.
  86. He W, Hu J, Xia Y, & Yan R. Beta-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) regulates Notch signaling by controlling the cleavage of Jagged 1 (Jag1) and Jagged 2 (Jag2) proteins. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(30):20630–20637. doi:10.1074/jbc.M114.579862.
  87. Hu X, He W, Luo X, Tsubota KE, Yan R. BACE1 regulates hippocampal astrogenesis via the Jagged1-notch pathway. Cell Rep. 2013;4(1):40–9. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.06.005 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  88. Gaiano N, Fishell G. The role of notch in promoting glial and neural stem cell fates. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2002;25:471–90. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.030702.130823 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Morrison SJ, Perez SE, Qiao Z, Verdi JM, Hicks C, Weinmaster G, & Anderson DJ. Transient Notch activation initiates an irreversible switch from neurogenesis to gliogenesis by neural crest stem cells. Cell. 2000;101(5):499–510.Google Scholar
  90. Wilhelmsson U, Faiz M, de Pablo Y, Sjoqvist M, Andersson D, Widestrand A, et al. Astrocytes negatively regulate neurogenesis through the Jagged1-mediated notch pathway. Stem Cells. 2012;30(10):2320–9. doi:10.1002/stem.1196 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Alberi L, Liu S, Wang Y, Badie R, Smith-Hicks C, Wu J, et al. Activity-induced notch signaling in neurons requires arc/Arg3.1 and is essential for synaptic plasticity in hippocampal networks. Neuron. 2011;69(3):437–44. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.004 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  92. Stump G, Durrer A, Klein AL, Lutolf S, Suter U, Taylor V. Notch1 and its ligands Delta-like and jagged are expressed and active in distinct cell populations in the postnatal mouse brain. Mech Dev. 2002;114(1–2):153–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Presente A, Boyles RS, Serway CN, de Belle JS, Andres AJ. Notch is required for long-term memory in drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(6):1764–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.0308259100 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  94. Clarke LE, Barres BA. Emerging roles of astrocytes in neural circuit development. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14(5):311–21. doi:10.1038/nrn3484 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  95. Araque A, Parpura V, Sanzgiri RP, Haydon PG. Tripartite synapses: glia, the unacknowledged partner. Trends Neurosci. 1999;22(5):208–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Bushong EA, Martone ME, Jones YZ, Ellisman MH. Protoplasmic astrocytes in CA1 stratum radiatum occupy separate anatomical domains. J Neurosci. 2002;22(1):183–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Halassa MM, Fellin T, Takano H, Dong JH, Haydon PG. Synaptic islands defined by the territory of a single astrocyte. J Neurosci. 2007;27(24):6473–7. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1419-07.2007 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Oberheim NA, Takano T, Han X, He W, Lin JH, Wang F, et al. Uniquely hominid features of adult human astrocytes. J Neurosci. 2009;29(10):3276–87. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4707-08.2009 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  99. Beattie EC, Stellwagen D, Morishita W, Bresnahan JC, Ha BK, Von Zastrow M, et al. Control of synaptic strength by glial TNFalpha. Science. 2002;295(5563):2282–5. doi:10.1126/science.1067859 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Benilova I, Gallardo R, Ungureanu AA, Castillo Cano V, Snellinx A, Ramakers M, et al. The Alzheimer disease protective mutation A2T modulates kinetic and thermodynamic properties of amyloid-beta (Abeta) aggregation. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(45):30977–89. doi:10.1074/jbc.M114.599027 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  101. Jonsson T, Atwal JK, Steinberg S, Snaedal J, Jonsson PV, Bjornsson S, et al. A mutation in APP protects against Alzheimer's disease and age-related cognitive decline. Nature. 2012;488(7409):96–9. doi:10.1038/nature11283 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Maloney JA, Bainbridge T, Gustafson A, Zhang S, Kyauk R, Steiner P, et al. Molecular mechanisms of Alzheimer disease protection by the A673T allele of amyloid precursor protein. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(45):30990–1000. doi:10.1074/jbc.M114.589069 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  103. Kennedy ME, Stamford AW, Chen X, Cox K, Cumming JN, Dockendorf MF, et al. The BACE1 inhibitor verubecestat (MK-8931) reduces CNS beta-amyloid in animal models and in Alzheimer's disease patients. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(363):363ra150. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aad9704 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017