Open Access

Pathological correlations between traumatic brain injury and chronic neurodegenerative diseases

Contributed equally
Translational Neurodegeneration20176:20

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40035-017-0088-2

Received: 4 January 2017

Accepted: 27 June 2017

Published: 11 July 2017

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury is among the most common causes of death and disability in youth and young adults. In addition to the acute risk of morbidity with moderate to severe injuries, traumatic brain injury is associated with a number of chronic neurological and neuropsychiatric sequelae including neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. However, despite the high incidence of traumatic brain injuries and the established clinical correlation with neurodegeneration, the causative factors linking these processes have not yet been fully elucidated. Apart from removal from activity, few, if any prophylactic treatments against post-traumatic brain injury neurodegeneration exist. Therefore, it is imperative to understand the pathophysiological mechanisms of traumatic brain injury and neurodegeneration in order to identify potential factors that initiate neurodegenerative processes. Oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and glutamatergic excitotoxicity have previously been implicated in both secondary brain injury and neurodegeneration. In particular, reactive oxygen species appear to be key in mediating molecular insult in neuroinflammation and excitotoxicity. As such, it is likely that post injury oxidative stress is a key mechanism which links traumatic brain injury to increased risk of neurodegeneration. Consequently, reactive oxygen species and their subsequent byproducts may serve as novel fluid markers for identification and monitoring of cellular damage. Furthermore, these reactive species may further serve as a suitable therapeutic target to reduce the risk of post-injury neurodegeneration and provide long term quality of life improvements for those suffering from traumatic brain injury.

Keywords

Traumatic brain injury Neurodegenerative diseases Alzheimer’s disease Parkinson’s disease Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Oxidative stress Reactive oxygen species

Background

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents one of the most common causes of death and disability in young people [13]. About 1.6 million people per year experience traumatic brain injuries in the USA [4, 5]. Besides the initial mechanical damage, TBI can induce a process of secondary injury [6, 7], which can lead to long term neurological and neuropsychiatric sequelae [8, 9], depicting a serious public health problem worldwide [10]. Some of the observed post-TBI sequelae include, but are not limited to, neurodegenerative diseases [11], such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [12], Parkinson’s disease (PD) [13], and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [14].

Importantly, the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis that lead to such disabilities are still incompletely understood [15, 16]. Therefore, while the post-TBI central nervous system (CNS) illnesses have a high prevalence [17]; few, if any, treatments are available to deter and prevent the pathological progression thought to lead to chronic neurological diseases and conditions [1821]. Thus, a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying TBI and neurological diseases is crucial to uncover the potential link between these conditions to enable development of effective diagnostic and treatment strategies which could reduce the incidence of post-TBI neurological complications.

This review intends to present the analysis of the current related published literature, that could lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying TBI and neurodegenerative diseases, that might be linked to the development of neurodegenerative diseases post-TBI.

Pathological mechanisms of TBI

In most cases, TBI results from a physical blow to the head during traumatic events such as falls [22], motor vehicle collisions [23], or sports related injuries [24], although these injuries can also be inflicted by exposure to explosive blasts [25]. TBI is currently classified as mild, moderate, or severe based on clinical observations and history such as duration of loss of consciousness and post traumatic amnesia [26, 27]. Mild TBI (mTBI) comprises the majority of cases [28]; however, diagnosis is primarily by exclusion of injuries requiring specific intervention [29]. Furthermore, inconsistent clinical definitions between governing organizations presents challenges in comparing incidence rates of mTBI [28, 30]. This difficulty in diagnosis can be a serious concern due to acute effects such as second impact syndrome [24] or through chronic effects arising from repetitive TBI [31].

Damage to nervous tissue can be classified as primary injury, which occurs as a direct result of the experienced physical forces [32]; and secondary injury, which arises from pathophysiological processes following the traumatic event [33]. The primary injury process consists of the rapid acceleration-deceleration applied to the head, which is thought to damage the brain by producing shear forces within nervous tissue resulting in axonal injury and impact with the cranial wall [34]. These injuries can be ipsilateral or contralateral to the blow, and have been described in literature as coup and contre-coup, respectively [35]. In more severe cases, injury can cause intracranial hemorrhage and subsequent intracranial hypertension [26]. This increase in pressure not only damages brain tissue by compression, but also by causing cerebral hypoperfusion and potential ischemic injury by decreasing cerebral perfusion pressure [36].

Secondary injury in TBI typically occurs in the days, weeks, and months following the traumatic event due to biochemical changes in nervous tissue [37, 38]. This damage is frequently mediated by free radicals and reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced from ischemia-reperfusion injury, glutamatergic excitotoxicity, or neuroinflammation [3941]. Following the initial trauma, axonal damage from the shear forces of primary injury affects membrane permeability and ionic balance [42]. In particular, uptake of calcium through either membrane disruption or activation of NMDA and AMPA receptors by glutamate can result in mitochondrial dysfunction and overproduction of free radicals and activation of apoptotic caspase signaling [4345]. Subsequent inflammatory processes such as activation of native microglia may also contribute to oxidative stress via oxidative burst or through secondary effects of inflammatory cytokines [46]. These reactive radicals can overwhelm endogenous antioxidant systems and inflict cellular damage via lipid peroxidation and protein modifications [47]. The secondary products of free radical mediated lipid peroxidation, such as reactive carbonyl species, are also electrophilic and can further propagate oxidative damage to biomacromolecules [48, 49].

Clinical and preclinical studies have demonstrated the presence of oxidative stress and its byproducts following TBI with both serological and histological methods [5052]. In animal studies, these products have been shown to be elevated as early as one day [53] following a single traumatic event and to persist up to 42 days with repeated injury [50]. Furthermore, spectroscopic evaluation suggests that the major endogenous antioxidants glutathione and ascorbic acid may remain diminished for 3 and 14 days post injury, respectively [38]. Elevation of F2-isoprostane, a lipid peroxidation byproduct, has been observed in the cerebrospinal fluid of human severe TBI patients with peak levels at 1 day post injury; however this was primarily an evaluation of hypothermia treatment and did not establish comparison with healthy controls [47]. Lipid peroxidation products such as 4-hydroxynoneal were also found to be elevated in the serum of severe TBI patients requiring long term care [54]. Although chronic oxidative stress has not currently been observed following single mild injuries in humans, it appears likely that oxidative stress and its associated processes may exacerbate or prolong post-concussive symptoms [55]. Given the common involvement of oxidative stress in excitotoxicity and reperfusion injury, it is likely that oxidative stress plays a central role in secondary neuronal injury following TBI.

The pathological mechanisms in secondary TBI are particularly interesting due to capacity to prolong cellular injury beyond the initial traumatic event. Some of these characteristic changes, such as oxidative stress and excitotoxicity, have also been observed in the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases which suggests a potential pathological mechanistic link between TBI and neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, review of the pathological mechanisms in neurodegenerative diseases and TBI may be helpful in elucidating the causative factors for development of neurodegenerative diseases after TBI.

Pathological mechanisms of neurodegenerative diseases

Despite divergent clinical presentation, AD, PD, and ALS have several common characteristics [56]. Each disease has identified genetic risk factors, although most cases are idiopathic [5759]. Pathologically, these diseases are characterized by the degeneration of specific neuronal populations associated with the observed clinical symptoms [60, 61]. In addition, aggregation or dysfunction of amyloid-β (Aβ), α-synuclein, and superoxide dismutase (SOD1) are commonly found in AD, PD, and ALS, respectively [56, 6265]. Although the exact mechanisms of pathogenesis have not been fully determined, it has been suggested that oxidative stress, glutamatergic excitotoxicity, and neuroinflammation play key roles in the pathophysiology of neurodegeneration, particularly in AD [6671], PD [7276], and ALS [56, 7781].

Alzheimer’s disease has an extraordinary high prevalence in the elderly population that greatly reduces the quality of life and the survival [82]. In 2008, as many people as 24 million had dementia world-wide, of whom most had AD; number which was expected to double every 20 years as the population aged [83]. Alzheimer’s disease’s pathology involves the presence of neuritic plaques and the loss of cholinergic neurons in the brain, but the underlying mechanisms leading to these events are still unclear [84]. Neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease is thought to occur due to the accumulation of amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) in plaques in the brain tissue, but the mechanisms underlying its aggregation and toxicity are still incompletely understood [85].

Specifically, studies have indicated that oxidative stress might play a major role in AD pathogenesis [86], due to direct evidence of increased neurotoxic markers of lipid peroxidation, such as 4-hydroxynonenal, in human subjects [87], excessive brain protein oxidation in AD [88], increased nuclear DNA oxidation in the brain of AD patients [89], 30% increased activity of the free radical scavenging enzyme SOD-1 in cell lines of AD patients [90], and significantly, direct evidence that beta amyloid generates free radical peptides [70, 91]. Additionally, it has been well documented that Aβ-induced free radicals and lipid peroxidation are major contributors to neuronal death in AD [92, 93]. Remarkably, in vitro and animal studies have shown that the antioxidant effect of cannabinoids was able to prevent the neurodegenerative process occurring in the disease [94], suggestive of the important role of oxidative stress in the neurodegenerative process of AD.

Another process that has been related to Aβ toxicity is inflammation, which has also been linked to oxidative stress by inflammatory cytokines’ activity [95]. Under healthy conditions, inflammatory processes are expected to restore cellular homeostasis and rebalance redox equilibrium [96]; but in AD conditions, the inflammatory processes are altered with co-localized Aβ deposits, inflammatory related proteins, and activated microglia [97]. Microglia and astroglia recognize misfolded and aggregated proteins to trigger an innate immune response that contributes to the disease progression and severity [98]. In other words, microglia recruitment promotes Aβ clearance and is neuroprotective in early stages of AD, but as the disease progresses, inflammatory cytokines downregulate Aβ clearance genes, and promote Aβ accumulation, contributing to neurodegeneration [99]. Furthermore, cytokines can induce the production of arachidonic acid, which exacerbates neurodegenerative processes by increasing extracellular levels of glutamate, known to cause excitotoxicity in AD [100]; and can also lead to the formation of superoxide free radicals, which have a direct effect in cellular death [101]. Moreover, studies suggest that non-enzymatically glycated tau induces oxidative stress, which results in cytokine gene expression and release of Aβ-peptide in AD [102], indicating a vicious pathological mechanistic circle between cytokines and oxidative stress that contributes to the progression and severity of AD. Additionally, oxidative damage from reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxidation products, such as 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE), is capable of inhibiting glutamate transporters, causing a decreased glutamate uptake critical for neuronal survival, an increased glutamate concentration in the synaptic cleft, and subsequent excitotoxicity that leads to neurodegeneration in AD [103].

Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a progressive neurodegenerative syndrome associated with repeated blunt force impacts to the head with transfer of acceleration and deceleration forces to the brain [104]; in other words, caused by repetitive mild traumatic brain injuries [105], although the central pathological mechanism explaining the development of progressive degeneration in CTE has not been elucidated [106]. CTE has been clinically associated with behavioral and personality changes, parkinsonism and dementia [107, 108]. Original findings of CTE studies were similar to Alzheimer’s disease, but different in the predominance of tau protein deposition over amyloid [109]. The tau protein deposition in CTE is interesting since it has been previously demonstrated that tau inhibits kinesin-dependent transport of peroxisomes, and that the loss of peroxisomes makes the cells vulnerable to oxidative stress, leading to degeneration [110]. This tau protein deposition, which also occurs in AD but less dramatically when compared to CTE, also inhibits the transport of amyloid precursor protein (APP) into axons or dendrites, causing its accumulation in the cell body [110]. Besides tau proteins, fragments of TDP43, a nuclear RNA/DNA binding protein that regulates the transcription of thousands of genes [111], have been identified in AD, PD, ALS, and CTE, which induce the misfolding of SOD1, predisposing the surrounding cells to free-radical damage [112, 113]. These observations indicate the relevance of oxidative stress also in CTE neurodegeneration.

Chronic inflammation has also been observed in CTE and AD, which is thought to exacerbate the neurodegenerative process [31], and as previously described, has a relationship with oxidative stress though inflammatory cytokines. Moreover, it has been previously described that after the initial head trauma in CTE, microglia get activated and release toxic levels of cytokines, excitotoxins like glutamate, etc.; the excitotoxins inhibit phosphatases, resulting in hyperphosphorylated tau, neurotubule dysfunction, and neurofibrillary tangle deposition, all being relevant components of the CTE syndrome; and besides, there appears to be a synergy between proinflammatory cytokines and glutamate receptors that increases reactive oxygen species and worsens neurodegeneration in the injured brain [106, 114].

Parkinson’s disease is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disease in industrialized countries with prevalence of approximately 0.3% of the adult population [59]. Histologically, PD is characterized by the formation of α-synuclein rich Lewy bodies and subsequent death of the dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra [63]. Several genetic risk factors have been identified including mutations to the ubiquitin proteasome system [59, 115]. Although the exact mechanisms which initiate dopaminergic degeneration in non-hereditary PD are still unclear, it has been suggested that oxidative modification or carbonylation of the lysine rich N-terminus and non-amyloid component of α-synuclein may contribute to α-synuclein aggregation [63, 116, 117].

Consistent with this notion, the reactive carbonyls produced as secondary products in oxidative stress have been shown to form lysine adducts and induce α-synuclein aggregation in vitro [118, 119]. In addition, animal models of PD using agents such as 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine have demonstrated increased production of superoxide in dopaminergic cells relative to cortex [120]. Furthermore, mitochondrial localization of α-synuclein has been shown to promote oxidative stress in vitro [121]. Neuroinflammation has been proposed as a partial contributor to the oxidative stress in PD [122] with activated microglia being observed in the substantia nigra and striatum of deceased PD patients [123, 124]. Similarly, activated microglia were seen in rhesus monkeys up to 14 years after model induction [125]. Additionally, glutamatergic excitotoxicity has been proposed to play a role in PD. Rotigotine, an FDA approved dopamine receptor agonist, has been suggested to improve the efficiency of glutamate transporter 1 [126] (GLT-1), and has been shown to offer neuroprotection against glutamatergic excitotoxicity in dopaminergic cell culture [127].

On the other hand, ALS is a fatal neurodegenerative disease characterized by the death of motor neurons in the central nervous system and is the most common motor neuron disease [128]. Approximately 10% of ALS cases have been attributed to genetic causes while the majority are idiopathic [57]. Mutations affecting superoxide dismutase (SOD1) account for nearly 20%, of familial cases; however, this accounts for only 2% of cases overall [58]. Despite identification of these mutations, the exact pathological mechanism is yet to be determined [129].

SOD1 mutant mouse models have demonstrated formation of SOD1 aggregates [64]. Given the role of SOD1 in detoxification of the superoxide radical [130], it was previously suggested that loss of function could cause increased cellular exposure to reactive oxygen species [131]; however, this hypothesis has been challenged by findings of normal development of SOD1 deficient mice in the absence of significant traumatic insult [132]. Furthermore, Bruijn et al. found that SOD1 mutant animals showed no significant improvement in symptomatic progression with knockout or coexpression of wild type SOD1 [64] which suggests that the mutation results not in loss of function, but rather a gain of toxic properties. Studies in rats and human patients suggest that, similar to α-synuclein and Aβ, SOD1 mutation results in formation of potentially cytotoxic protein aggregates even in patients lacking known mutations of SOD1 [62, 64, 133]. In addition, the altered catalysis performed by some mutant variants results in diminished astroglial reuptake of glutamate via inhibition of GLT-1 [134137]. Indeed, Riluzole, an FDA approved treatment for ALS, has been suggested to alleviate glutamatergic excitotoxicity via a variety of mechanisms including increased glutamate uptake via GLT-1 [138] and blockade of sensitive channels [126]. Hence, it appears that oxidative stress is also involved in the processes of neuronal death and disease progression in ALS [139].

Given its role in mediating damage from neuroinflammation and excitotoxicity, it is likely that oxidative stress plays an important role in the pathophysiology of AD, PD, and ALS in a similar fashion to TBI. As such, addressing oxidative stress in neurodegeneration could serve as an effective strategy in neuroprotection.

Behavioral and molecular mechanisms linking TBI to neurodegenerative diseases

Several studies have reported an increased incidence of the development of neurodegenerative diseases after TBI events. Previous reports have indicated a three times higher incidence of PD among TBI victims, compared to overall cases [13]. Similarly, the incidence of AD has been reported to be higher for post-TBI cases [140, 141]. TBI has also been suggested to be a risk factor for ALS with repeated studies in professional Italian soccer players showing elevated risk of disease [142, 143]. A case control study of ALS patients in the United States also found a nearly 11-fold increase in ALS risk with repeated TBI [14]. However, at this time it appears unlikely that a single occurrence of TBI significantly affects risk of ALS [14, 144]. In addition, chronic traumatic encephalitis (CTE), a tau pathology, has drawn increasing attention due to presence in NFL players and professional athletes that suffer from repeated TBI [107, 145]. Because the incidence of neurodegenerative diseases and conditions appears to be increased after TBI, it is relevant to discuss the possible behavioral and molecular mechanisms linking TBI to neurodegeneration.

TBI victims and TBI animal models have been shown to present characteristic pathological changes in key proteins, reflecting the interruption of axonal transport due to axonal injury [146]. The accumulated proteins that induce protein neuropathy include Aβ [147], α-synuclein [148], and tau protein [149]. These protein changes are particularly interesting, since it is well-established that Aβ protein aggregation is an important pathological component of AD [150], α-synuclein protein aggregation is a critical characteristic of PD [151, 152], and tau protein aggregation is important in the pathogenesis of CTE [153] and AD [154]. Remarkably, these protein neuropathological changes can be promoted in all three proteins via oxidative stress related free radicals and reactive aldehydes which are commonly elevated following TBI [77, 118, 119, 155, 156]. In addition, the reactive aldehyde byproducts of lipid peroxidation have been shown to cause further lipid peroxidation [52]. Given that these pathological protein states can also induce production of free radicals through excitotoxicity [127, 128] or alteration of mitochondrial ion balance [92, 121] and that reactive aldehydes can induce further lipid peroxidation and protein carbonylation [48, 49, 157, 158], it is possible that oxidative stress holds a key role in a self-propagating cycle of lipid peroxidation, protein carbonylation, and neurodegenerative protein aggregation.

TBI patients and TBI animal models have shown behavioral signs such as post-TBI dementia that resembles AD [159]; post-TBI motor deficits that provide evidence of post-TBI brain tissue damage in the area of the hippocampus [160], resembling brain tissue damage in AD [161]; and damage in the basal ganglia [162], resembling the brain tissue damage that occurs in PD [163]. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have also indicated transient and persistent neuropathological functional changes in the brain of TBI victims that could contribute to the development of chronic neurodegenerative diseases [164]. These changes observed in post-injury patients suggest that TBI could inflict the initial tissue damage that resembles or promotes processes common in the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases.

Based on the central role that oxidative stress plays in post-TBI secondary injury and in the pathophysiology of neurodegeneration, it is probable that oxidative stress is a key process in linking TBI to increased incidence of neurodegeneration. Therefore, oxidative stress may serve as a therapeutic, diagnostic, or prognostic marker in evaluating the risks of long term neurological consequences following TBI.

Effective diagnosis and treatment of post-TBI neurological sequelae

Considering the significant risks incurred by TBI, it is clear that there is an imminent need for effective methods of early diagnosis, management, and monitoring of TBI patients to curtail the incidence of post-TBI neurological sequelae. At this time, diagnosis of TBI is based primarily on patient provided history and clinical observations [165167]. Several clinical workflows have been developed for evaluation of mTBI, which is the most prevalent form of clinical TBI, including the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool and Military Acute Concussion Evaluation; however, these assessments are designed for use shortly following injury and, as such, rapidly diminish in sensitivity with delayed evaluation [168]. As well, the Glasgow Coma Scale has been in use for decades and allows for both rapid and consistent communication of patient condition [169]; nevertheless, the currently accepted threshold score of 13 may not be adequate to exclude visible abnormalities on computed tomography imaging that require neurosurgical intervention [170]. Due to these shortcomings in current diagnostic methodologies, civilian and military work groups have recommended the development of fluid or imaging based biomarkers for identification of mTBI [166, 168].

Several compounds and proteins have been suggested to serve as fluid biomarkers including glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), calcium binding protein S100B, and tau protein [171]. In most cases, presence of these biomarkers is partially indicative of blood brain barrier disruption as they are typically confined within the central nervous system [171]. These proteins have been shown to be acutely elevated following TBI in human patients [172174], but currently face challenges of low specificity [175, 176], poor correlation with development of post-concussive symptoms [177], and poor correlation with imaging abnormalities [178, 179].

Given the key role of oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in secondary neuronal injury and neurodegeneration, it is likely that the products of these processes may also serve as suitable biomarkers. As previously discussed, plasma levels of several oxidative stress and inflammation related markers have been observed to be elevated in serum up to 42 days after multiple blast injuries [50] and as early as 1 day following a single injury [53]. Furthermore, lipid peroxidation products, such as acrolein and 4-hydroxynonenal, have also been shown to be involved not only in TBI secondary injury [50, 53], but also in other modes of neuronal insult such as spinal cord injury [51, 180] and ischemia-reperfusion injury [181]. Given that these peroxidation products are not only indicative of damage, but also capable of causing modification of biomacromolecules, it is possible that measured elevations may be indicative not only of present damage, but also of continued secondary injury [49, 52, 182, 183]. As such, alleviation of oxidative stress could serve as a viable prophylactic strategy to diminish the risk of post TBI neurodegeneration. Direct supplementation with endogenous antioxidants, such as glutathione and superoxide dismutase, has not shown significant benefits as they do not easily cross the blood brain barrier [184186]. However, the glutathione precursor N-acetylcysteine has shown some acute benefits in both animal and human studies [55, 187]. In addition, targeting of downstream components of the oxidative cascade, such as reactive aldehydes, has been suggested as a potential strategy due to the more extended half-lives of these compounds when compared to ROS [180, 184, 185]. However, despite extended elevation of inflammatory and oxidative byproducts, trials of antioxidant therapies have typically favored acute treatment, often within hours of the traumatic event, suggesting that acute treatment and monitoring may be more appropriate [184].

Considering the crucial role of post-TBI oxidative stress in the development and progression of chronic neurological diseases, detection and therapeutic targeting of this process appears to be a promising strategy for assessment, treatment, and monitoring of neurodegeneration risk post TBI. Given their connection to oxidative stress, inflammatory markers and lipid peroxidation byproducts could serve as surrogate biofluid markers. In addition, antioxidant treatment strategies can help neutralize perpetuation of cellular and molecular damage and diminish risks of long term neurological sequelae.

Conclusion

Despite the prevalence of TBI in both civilian and military populations and the significant neurological sequelae incurred by such injuries, diagnosis and treatment of TBI remains poorly understood. Furthermore, the causative factors linking TBI to neurodegenerative diseases, such as AD, PD, ALS, and CTE, have not been fully elucidated. Several processes, including oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, have been found to be common between TBI secondary injury and several neurodegenerative diseases. In particular, oxidative stress appears to be the key mechanism linking neuroinflammation and glutamatergic excitotoxicity in both TBI and neurodegeneration. As such, it is probable that the oxidative cascade induced by TBI initiates and subsequently propagates the characteristic pathologies of neurodegeneration via oxidation or carbonylation of key proteins.

Due to the high prevalence of TBI and neurodegenerative diseases, the development of new effective strategies for early diagnosis and treatment for TBI is imperative. Given the key role that oxidative stress plays in linking secondary injury and neurodegeneration, detection of ROS and key byproducts could serve as a novel method for identification and monitoring of potential cellular damage. Furthermore, these reactive species may serve as a viable therapeutic target for reduction of long term neurodegeneration risk following TBI, having the potential to reduce the disability and death, and improve the quality of life in the long term of the civilian and military populations that suffer of TBI.

Abbreviations

AD: 

Alzheimer’s disease

ALS: 

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

APP: 

Amyloid precursor protein

Aβ: 

Amyloid beta

CNS: 

Central nervous system

CTE: 

Chronic traumatic encephalopathy

GLT-1: 

Glutamate transporter 1

mTBI: 

Mild traumatic brain injury

PD: 

Parkinson’s disease

ROS: 

Reactive Oxygen Species

SOD1: 

Superoxide dismutase

TBI: 

Traumatic brain injury

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Research findings described here were partially supported by the Indiana State Department of Health, Indiana Clinical and Translational Science Institute, National Institutes of Health. All funding was used for the design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data and in the writing of the manuscript.

Funding

Indiana State Department of Health, Indiana Clinical and Translational Science Institute, National Institutes of Health.

Availability of data and materials

All the data mentioned in this review are available on published article.

Authors’ contributions

All authors have contributed to all parts of the production of this manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Riyi Shi is the co-founder of Neuro Vigor, a start-up company with business interests of developing effective therapies for CNS neurodegenerative diseases and trauma. The other authors declare they have no competing interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University
(2)
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Purdue University

References

  1. Ghajar J. Traumatic brain injury. Lancet. 2000;356:923–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Maas AI, Stocchetti N, Bullock R. Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:728–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. McIntosh TK, Smith DH, Meaney DF, Kotapka MJ, Gennarelli TA, Graham DI. Neuropathological sequelae of traumatic brain injury: relationship to neurochemical and biomechanical mechanisms. Lab Investig J Tech Methods Pathol. 1996;74:315–42.Google Scholar
  4. Sosin DM, Sniezek JE, Thurman DJ. Incidence of mild and moderate brain injury in the United States, 1991. Brain Inj. 1996;10:47–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado VG. Traumatic brain injury in the United States. Atlanta GA Natl. Cent. Inj. Prev. Control Cent. Dis. Control Prev. [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2016 Nov 12]; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/pdf/blue_book.pdf
  6. Bales JW, Kline AE, Wagner AK, Dixon CE. Targeting dopamine in acute traumatic brain injury. Open Drug Discov J. 2010;2:119–28.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Masel BE, DeWitt DS. Traumatic brain injury: a disease process. Not an Event J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:1529–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Rimel RW, Giordani B, Barth JT, Boll TJ, Jane JA. Disability caused by minor head injury. Neurosurgery. 1981;9:221–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Riggio S, Wong M. Neurobehavioral sequelae of traumatic brain injury. Mt. Sinai J. Med. J. Transl. Pers. Med. 2009;76:163–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Langlois JA, Rutland-Brown W, Wald MM. The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21:375–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Uryu K, Chen X-H, Martinez D, Browne KD, Johnson VE, Graham DI, et al. Multiple proteins implicated in neurodegenerative diseases accumulate in axons after brain trauma in humans. Exp Neurol. 2007;208:185–92.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Gardner RC, Yaffe K. Epidemiology of mild traumatic brain injury and neurodegenerative disease. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2015;66:75–80.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldman SM, Tanner CM, Oakes D, Bhudhikanok GS, Gupta A, Langston JW. Head injury and Parkinson’s disease risk in twins. Ann Neurol. 2006;60:65–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen H, Richard M, Sandler DP, Umbach DM, Kamel F. Head injury and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:810–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kampfl A, Posmantur RM, Zhao X, Schmutzhard E, Clifton GL, Hayes RL. Mechanisms of Calpain proteolysis following traumatic brain injury: implications for pathology and therapy: a review and update. J Neurotrauma. 1997;14:121–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson VE, Stewart W, Smith DH. Widespread tau and Amyloid-Beta pathology many years after a single traumatic brain injury in humans: long-term AD-like pathology after single TBI. Brain Pathol. 2012;22:142–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. DeKosky ST, Ikonomovic MD, Gandy S. Traumatic brain injury — football, warfare, and long-term effects. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1293–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Marion DW, Penrod LE, Kelsey SF, Obrist WD, Kochanek PM, Palmer AM, et al. Treatment of traumatic brain injury with moderate hypothermia. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:540–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Faden AL, Demediuk P, Panter SS, Vink R. The role of excitatory amino acids and NMDA receptors in traumatic brain injury. Science. 1989;244:798.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Khanna S, Davis D, Peterson B, Fisher B, Tung H, O’Quigley J, et al. Use of hypertonic saline in the treatment of severe refractory posttraumatic intracranial hypertension in pediatric traumatic brain injury: Crit. Care Med. 2000;28:1144–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoge CW, McGurk D, Thomas JL, Cox AL, Engel CC, Castro CA. Mild traumatic brain injury in U.S. soldiers returning from Iraq. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:453–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Rutland-Brown W, Langlois JA, Thomas KE, Xi YL, et al. Incidence of traumatic brain injury in the United States, 2003. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21:544.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Fu TS, Jing R, McFaull SR, Cusimano MD. Health & Economic Burden of traumatic brain injury in the emergency Department. Can J Neurol Sci. 2016;43:238–47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Jordan BD. The clinical spectrum of sport-related traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9:222–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Cernak I, Noble-Haeusslein LJ. Traumatic brain injury: an overview of pathobiology with emphasis on military populations. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010;30:255–66.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Malec JF, Brown AW, Leibson CL, Flaada JT, Mandrekar JN, Diehl NN, et al. The Mayo classification system for traumatic brain injury severity. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:1417–24.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Graham DI, Adams JH, Nicoll JAR, Maxwell WL, Gennarelli TA. The nature, distribution and causes of traumatic brain injury. Brain Pathol. 1995;5:397–406.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Faul M, Coronado V. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;127:3–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Carroll L, Cassidy JD, Peloso P, Borg J, Von Holst H, Holm L, et al. Prognosis for mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO collaborating Centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2004;36:84–105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Summers CR, Ivins B, Schwab KA. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: an epidemiologic overview. Mt. Sinai J. Med. J. Transl. Pers. Med. 2009;76:105–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Stern RA, Riley DO, Daneshvar DH, Nowinski CJ, Cantu RC, McKee AC. Long-term consequences of repetitive brain trauma: chronic traumatic encephalopathy. PM&R. 2011;3:S460–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Cernak I, Wang Z, Jiang J, Bian X, Savic J. Ultrastructural and functional characteristics of blast injury-induced neurotrauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2001;50:695–706.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Tator CH, Fehlings MG. Review of the secondary injury theory of acute spinal cord trauma with emphasis on vascular mechanisms. J Neurosurg. 1991;75:15–26.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Shaw NA. The neurophysiology of concussion. Prog Neurobiol. 2002;67:281–344.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ommaya AK, Grubb RL Jr, Naumann RA. Coup and contre-coup injury: observations on the mechanics of visible brain injuries in the rhesus monkey. J Neurosurg. 1971;35:503–16.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VI. Indications for intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(Suppl 1):S37–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Greve MW, Zink BJ. Pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury. Mt Sinai J Med J Transl Pers Med. 2009;76:97–104.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Harris JL, Yeh H-W, Choi I-Y, Lee P, Berman NE, Swerdlow RH, et al. Altered neurochemical profile after traumatic brain injury: 1H-MRS biomarkers of pathological mechanisms. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32:2122–34.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Bang SA, Song YS, Moon BS, Lee BC, Lee H, Kim J-M, et al. Neuropsychological, metabolic, and GABA A receptor studies in subjects with repetitive traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2016;33:1005–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Bose R, Schnell CL, Pinsky C, Zitko V. Effects of excitotoxins on free radical indices in mouse brain. Toxicol Lett. 1992;60:211–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Cornelius C, Crupi R, Calabrese V, Graziano A, Milone P, Pennisi G, et al. Traumatic brain injury: oxidative stress and Neuroprotection. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013;19:836–53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Werner C, Engelhard K. Pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:4–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Globus MY-T, Alonso O, Dietrich WD, Busto R, Ginsberg MD. Glutamate release and free radical production following brain injury: effects of posttraumatic hypothermia. J Neurochem. 2002;65:1704–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Leist M, Volbracht C, Kühnle S, Fava E, Ferrando-May E, Nicotera P. Caspase-mediated apoptosis in neuronal excitotoxicity triggered by nitric oxide. Mol Med. 1997;3:750–64.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang Y, Bhavnani BR. Glutamate-induced apoptosis in neuronal cells is mediated via caspase-dependent and independent mechanisms involving calpain and caspase-3 proteases as well as apoptosis inducing factor (AIF) and this process is inhibited by equine estrogens. BMC Neurosci. 2006;7:49.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. DiSabato DJ, Quan N, Godbout JP. Neuroinflammation: the devil is in the details. J Neurochem. 139:136–53.Google Scholar
  47. Bayir H, Marion DW, Puccio AM, Wisniewski SR, Janesko KL, Clark RSB, et al. Marked gender effect on lipid peroxidation after severe traumatic brain injury in adult patients. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21:1–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Negre-Salvayre A, Coatrieux C, Ingueneau C, Salvayre R. Advanced lipid peroxidation end products in oxidative damage to proteins. Potential role in diseases and therapeutic prospects for the inhibitors. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;153:6–20.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Stevens JF, Maier CS. Acrolein: sources, metabolism, and biomolecular interactions relevant to human health and disease. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2008;52:7–25.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Ahmed FA, Kamnaksh A, Kovesdi E, Long JB, Agoston DV. Long-term consequences of single and multiple mild blast exposure on select physiological parameters and blood-based biomarkers. Electrophoresis. 2013;34:2229–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Zheng L, Park J, Walls M, Tully M, Jannasch A, Cooper B, et al. Determination of urine 3-HPMA, a stable acrolein metabolite in a rat model of spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2013;30:1334–41.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Uchida K, Kanematsu M, Sakai K, Matsuda T, Hattori N, Mizuno Y, et al. Protein-bound acrolein: potential markers for oxidative stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U A. 1998;95:4882–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Walls MK, Race N, Zheng L, Vega-Alvarez SM, Acosta G, Park J, et al. Structural and biochemical abnormalities in the absence of acute deficits in mild primary blast-induced head trauma. J Neurosurg. 2016;124:675–86.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Mackay GM, Forrest CM, Stoy N, Christofides J, Egerton M, Stone TW, et al. Tryptophan metabolism and oxidative stress in patients with chronic brain injury. Eur J Neurol. 2006;13:30–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Hoffer ME, Balaban C, Slade MD, Tsao JW, Hoffer B. Amelioration of acute Sequelae of blast induced mild traumatic brain injury by N-acetyl Cysteine: a double-blind, placebo controlled study. PLoS One. 2013;8Google Scholar
  56. Ransohoff RM. How neuroinflammation contributes to neurodegeneration. Science. 2016;353:777–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Kwiatkowski TJ, Bosco DA, LeClerc AL, Tamrazian E, Vanderburg CR, Russ C, et al. Mutations in the FUS/TLS Gene on chromosome 16 cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science. 2009;323:1205–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Ajroud-Driss S, Siddique T. Sporadic and hereditary amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA-Mol. Basis Dis. 1852;2015:679–84.Google Scholar
  59. de Lau LML, Breteler MMB. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:525–35.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Zarei S, Carr K, Reiley L, Diaz K, Guerra O, Altamirano PF, et al. A comprehensive review of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Surg Neurol Int. 2015;6:171.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Kalia LV, Lang AE. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 2015;386:896–912.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Forsberg K, Andersen PM, Marklund SL, Brannstrom T. Glial nuclear aggregates of superoxide dismutase-1 are regularly present in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol. 2011;121:623–34.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Stefanis L. Alpha-Synuclein in Parkinson’s disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2:a009399.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Bruijn LI. Aggregation and motor neuron toxicity of an ALS-linked SOD1 mutant independent from wild-type SOD1. Science. 1998;281:1851–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Petrov D, Daura X, Zagrovic B. Effect of oxidative damage on the stability and Dimerization of superoxide dismutase 1. Biophys J. 2016;110:1499–509.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Smith MA, Rottkamp CA, Nunomura A, Raina AK, Perry G. Oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA-Mol. Basis Dis. 2000;1502:139–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Barnham KJ, Masters CL, Bush AI. Neurodegenerative diseases and oxidative stress. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3:205–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Coyle J, Puttfarcken P. Oxidative stress, glutamate, and neurodegenerative disorders. Science. 1993;262:689–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Cutler RG, Kelly J, Storie K, Pedersen WA, Tammara A, Hatanpaa K, et al. Involvement of oxidative stress-induced abnormalities in ceramide and cholesterol metabolism in brain aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2004;101:2070–5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Butterfield DA, Lauderback CM. Lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation in Alzheimer’s disease brain: potential causes and consequences involving amyloid β-peptide-associated free radical oxidative stress1,2 1Guest editors: mark a. Smith and George Perry 2This article is part of a series of reviews on “causes and consequences of oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s disease.” the full list of papers may be found on the homepage of the journal. Free Radic Biol Med. 2002;32:1050–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Akiyama H. Inflammation and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2000;21:383–421.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Ebadi M, Srinivasan SK, Baxi MD. Oxidative stress and antioxidant therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Prog Neurobiol. 1996;48:1–19.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Jenner P, Dexter DT, Sian J, Schapira AHV, Marsden CD. The Royal Kings and Queens Parkinson’s disease research group. Oxidative stress as a cause of nigral cell death in Parkinson’s disease and incidental lewy body disease. Ann. Neurol. 1992;32:S82–7.Google Scholar
  74. Jenner P, Olanow CW. Oxidative stress and the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Neurology. 1996;47:161S–70S.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Jenner P. Oxidative stress in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2003;53:S26–38.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Hald A, Lotharius J. Oxidative stress and inflammation in Parkinson’s disease: is there a causal link? Exp Neurol. 2005;193:279–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Bizzozero OA. Protein carbonylation in neurodegenerative and demyelinating CNS diseases. Handb. Neurochem. Mol. Neurobiol. Brain spinal cord. Trauma. 2009:543–62.Google Scholar
  78. Kabashi E, Valdmanis PN, Dion P, Rouleau GA. Oxidized/misfolded superoxide dismutase-1: the cause of all amyotrophic lateral sclerosis? Ann Neurol. 2007;62:553–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Barber SC, Mead RJ, Shaw PJ. Oxidative stress in ALS: a mechanism of neurodegeneration and a therapeutic target. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA-Mol Basis Dis. 2006;1762:1051–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Glass CK, Saijo K, Winner B, Marchetto MC, Gage FH. Mechanisms Underlying Inflammation in Neurodegeneration. Cell. 2010;140:918–34.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Beal MF. Aging, energy, and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases. Ann Neurol. 1995;38:357–66.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Editorial KR. The prevalence and malignancy of Alzheimer disease. A major killer. Arch. Neurol. 1976;33:217–8.Google Scholar
  83. Mayeux R. Alzheimer’s disease: epidemiology. In: Neurology B-H of C, editor. Elsevier; 2008 [cited 2017 Apr 18]. p. 195–205. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0072-9752(07)01218-3
  84. Wang H-Y. Beta -Amyloid1-42 binds to alpha 7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor with high affinity. IMPLICATIONS FOR ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE PATHOLOGY. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:5626–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Hardy J. The Amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science. 2002;297:353–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Markesbery WR. Oxidative stress hypothesis in Alzheimer’s disease. Free Radic Biol Med. 1997;23:134–47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Williams TI, Lynn BC, Markesbery WR, Lovell MA. Increased levels of 4-hydroxynonenal and acrolein, neurotoxic markers of lipid peroxidation, in the brain in mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2006;27:1094–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Smith CD, Carney JM, Starke-Reed PE, Oliver CN, Stadtman ER, Floyd RA, et al. Excess brain protein oxidation and enzyme dysfunction in normal aging and in Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1991;88:10540–3.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Gabbita SP, Lovell MA, Markesbery WR. Increased nuclear DNA oxidation in the brain in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem. 2002;71:2034–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Zemlan FP, Thienhaus OJ, Bosmann HB. Superoxide dismutase activity in Alzheimer’s disease: possible mechanism for paired helical filament formation. Brain Res. 1989;476:160–2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Hensley K, Carney JM, Mattson MP, Aksenova M, Harris M, Wu JF, et al. A model for beta-amyloid aggregation and neurotoxicity based on free radical generation by the peptide: relevance to Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1994;91:3270–4.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Varadarajan S, Yatin S, Aksenova M, Butterfield DA. Review: Alzheimer’s Amyloid β-peptide-associated free radical oxidative stress and neurotoxicity. J Struct Biol. 2000;130:184–208.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Allan BD. Amyloid β-peptide (1-42)-induced oxidative stress and neurotoxicity: implications for Neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease brain. A Review Free Radic Res. 2002;36:1307–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Ramirez BG. Prevention of Alzheimer’s disease pathology by Cannabinoids: Neuroprotection mediated by blockade of Microglial activation. J Neurosci. 2005;25:1904–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Moneim AE. Oxidant/antioxidant imbalance and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2015;12:335–49.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Bona D, Scapagnini G, Candore G, Castiglia L, Colonna-Romano G, Duro G, et al. Immune-inflammatory responses and oxidative stress in Alzheimers disease: therapeutic implications. Curr Pharm Des. 2010;16:684–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Eikelenboom P, Bate C, Van Gool WA, Hoozemans JJM, Rozemuller JM, Veerhuis R, et al. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease and prion disease. Glia. 2002;40:232–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Heneka MT, Carson MJ, Khoury JE, Landreth GE, Brosseron F, Feinstein DL, et al. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:388–405.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Hickman SE, Allison EK, El Khoury J. Microglial dysfunction and defective-Amyloid clearance pathways in aging Alzheimer’s disease mice. J Neurosci. 2008;28:8354–60.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Hynd M. Glutamate-mediated excitotoxicity and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer?S disease. Neurochem Int. 2004;45:583–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. DeLeo JA, Yezierski RP. The role of neuroinflammation and neuroimmune activation in persistent pain. Pain. 2001;90:1–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Stern D. Non-enzymatically glycated tau in Alzheimer’s disease induces neuronal oxidant stress resulting in cytokine gene expression and release of amyloid b-peptide. Nat Med. 1995;1:693–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Lauderback CM, Hackett JM, Huang FF, Keller JN, Szweda LI, Markesbery WR, et al. The glial glutamate transporter, GLT-1, is oxidatively modified by 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal in the Alzheimer’s disease brain: the role of Aβ1-42: Aβ1-42 and HNE binding to GLT-1 in AD brain. J Neurochem. 2001;78:413–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Omalu B. Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy. In: Niranjan A, Lunsford LD, editors. Prog. Neurol. Surg. [Internet]. Basel: S. KARGER AG; 2014 [cited 2017 Apr 18]. p. 38–49. Available from: http://www.karger.com?doi=10.1159/000358761
  105. McKee AC, Stein TD, Nowinski CJ, Stern RA, Daneshvar DH, Alvarez VE, et al. The spectrum of disease in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Brain. 2013;136:43–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Blaylock RL, Maroon J, et al. Immunoexcitotoxicity as a central mechanism in chronic traumatic encephalopathy-a unifying hypothesis. Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:4103.Google Scholar
  107. McKee AC, Cantu RC, Nowinski CJ, Hedley-Whyte ET, Gavett BE, Budson AE, et al. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in athletes: progressive Tauopathy after repetitive head injury. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2009;68:709–35.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. McKee AC, Gavett BE, Stern RA, Nowinski CJ, Cantu RC, Kowall NW, et al. TDP-43 Proteinopathy and motor neuron disease in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2010;69:918–29.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Yi J, Padalino DJ, Chin LS, Montenegro P, Cantu RC. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy: Curr. Sports Med Rep. 2013;12:28–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Stamer K, Vogel R, Thies E, Mandelkow E, Mandelkow E-M. Tau blocks traffic of organelles, neurofilaments, and APP vesicles in neurons and enhances oxidative stress. J Cell Biol. 2002;156:1051–63.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Hebron ML, Lonskaya I, Sharpe K, Weerasinghe PPK, Algarzae NK, Shekoyan AR, et al. Parkin Ubiquitinates tar-DNA binding protein-43 (TDP-43) and promotes its Cytosolic accumulation via interaction with Histone Deacetylase 6 (HDAC6). J Biol Chem. 2013;288:4103–15.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Bandyopadhyay U, Cotney J, Nagy M, Oh S, Leng J, Mahajan M, et al. RNA-Seq profiling of spinal cord motor neurons from a Presymptomatic SOD1 ALS mouse. PLoS One. 2013;8:e53575. Cai H, editorPubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Lucke-Wold BP, Turner RC, Logsdon AF, Bailes JE, Huber JD, Rosen CL. Linking traumatic brain injury to chronic traumatic encephalopathy: identification of potential mechanisms leading to Neurofibrillary tangle development. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31:1129–38.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Saulle M, Greenwald BD. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy: a review. Rehabil Res Pract. 2012;2012:1–9.Google Scholar
  115. Zhang Y, Dawson VL, Dawson TM. Oxidative stress and genetics in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2000;7:240–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Atsmon-Raz Y, Miller Y. Non-Amyloid-beta component of human alpha-Synuclein Oligomers induces formation of new Abeta Oligomers: insight into the mechanisms that link Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2016;7:46–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Plotegher N, Bubacco L. Lysines, Achilles’ heel in alpha-synuclein conversion to a deadly neuronal endotoxin. Ageing Res Rev. 2016;26:62–71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Shamoto-Nagai M, Maruyama W, Hashizume Y, Yoshida M, Osawa T, Riederer P, et al. In parkinsonian substantia nigra, α-synuclein is modified by acrolein, a lipid-peroxidation product, and accumulates in the dopamine neurons with inhibition of proteasome activity. J Neural Transm. 2007;114:1559–67.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Qin Z, Hu D, Han S, Reaney SH, Di Monte DA, Fink AL. Effect of 4-Hydroxy-2-nonenal modification on -Synuclein aggregation. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:5862–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  120. Zhelev Z, Bakalova R, Aoki I, Lazarova D, Saga T. Imaging of superoxide generation in the Dopaminergic area of the brain in Parkinson’s disease, using Mito-TEMPO. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2013;4:1439–45.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  121. Parihar MS, Parihar A, Fujita M, Hashimoto M, Ghafourifar P. Mitochondrial association of alpha-synuclein causes oxidative stress. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65:1272–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  122. McGeer PL, McGeer EG. Inflammation and neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2004;10:S3–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  123. McGeer PL, Itagaki S, Boyes BE, McGeer EG. Reactive microglia are positive for HLA-DR in the substantia nigra of Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease brains. Neurology. 1988;38:1285–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  124. Yamada T, McGeer EG, Schelper RL, Wszolek ZK, McGeer PL, Pfeiffer RF, et al. Histological and biochemical pathology in a family with autosomal dominant parkinsonism and dementia. Neurol Psychiatry Brain Res. 1993;2Google Scholar
  125. McGeer PL, Schwab C, Parent A, Doudet D. Presence of reactive microglia in monkey substantia nigra years after 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyridine administration. Ann Neurol. 2003;54:599–604.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  126. Doble A. The pharmacology and mechanism of action of riluzole. Neurology. 1996;47:233S–41S.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  127. Oster S, Radad K, Scheller D, Hesse M, Balanzew W, Reichmann H, et al. Rotigotine protects against glutamate toxicity in primary dopaminergic cell culture. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014;724:31–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  128. Rowland LP, Shneider NA. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1688–700.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Sreedharan J, Blair IP, Tripathi VB, Hu X, Vance C, Rogelj B, et al. TDP-43 mutations in familial and sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science. 2008;319:1668–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  130. Zelko IN, Mariani TJ, Folz RJ. Superoxide dismutase multigene family: a comparison of the CuZn-SOD (SOD1), Mn-SOD (SOD2), and EC-SOD (SOD3) gene structures, evolution, and expression. Free Radic Biol Med. 2002;33:337–49.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  131. Barber SC, Shaw PJ. Oxidative stress in ALS: key role in motor neuron injury and therapeutic target. Free Radic Biol Med. 2010;48:629–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  132. Reaume AG, Elliott JL, Hoffman EK, Kowall NW, Ferrante RJ, Siwek DF, et al. Motor neurons in cu/Zn superoxide dismutase-deficient mice develop normally but exhibit enhanced cell death after axonal injury. Nat Genet. 1996;13:43–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Liu J, Lillo C, Jonsson PA, Vande Velde C, Ward CM, Miller TM, et al. Toxicity of familial ALS-linked SOD1 mutants from selective recruitment to spinal mitochondria. Neuron. 2004;43:5–17.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Trotti D, Rolfs A, Danbolt NC, Brown RH, Hediger MA. SOD1 mutants linked to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis selectively inactivate a glial glutamate transporter. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:427–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  135. Staats KA, Van Den Bosch L. Astrocytes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: direct effects on motor neuron survival. J Biol Phys. 2009;35:337–46.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  136. Foran E, Trotti D. Glutamate transporters and the excitotoxic path to motor neuron degeneration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009;11:1587–602.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  137. McGeer PL, McGeer EG. Inflammatory processes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve. 2002;26:459–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  138. Carbone M, Duty S, Rattray M. Riluzole elevates GLT-1 activity and levels in striatal astrocytes. Neurochem Int. 2012;60:31–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  139. Wootz H, Hansson I, Korhonen L, Näpänkangas U, Lindholm D. Caspase-12 cleavage and increased oxidative stress during motoneuron degeneration in transgenic mouse model of ALS. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;322:281–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  140. Roberts GW, Gentleman SM, Lynch A, Graham DI. βA4 amyloid protein deposition in brain after head trauma. Lancet. 1991;338:1422–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  141. Lye TC, Shores EA. Traumatic brain injury as a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease: a review. Neuropsychol Rev. 2000;10:115–29.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  142. Chiò A, Benzi G, Dossena M, Mutani R, Mora G. Severely increased risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis among Italian professional football players. Brain. 2005;128:472.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  143. Chio A, Calvo A, Dossena M, Ghiglione P, Mutani R, Mora G. ALS in Italian professional soccer players: the risk is still present and could be soccer-specific. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2009;10:205–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  144. Armon C, Nelson LM. Is head trauma a risk factor for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis? An evidence based review. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2012;13:351–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  145. Omalu BI, DeKosky ST, Minster RL, Kamboh MI, Hamilton RL, Wecht CH. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in a National Football League Player. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:128–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  146. Smith DH, Uryu K, Saatman KE, Trojanowski JQ, McIntosh TK. Protein accumulation in traumatic brain injury. Neuro Molecular Med. 2003;4:59–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  147. Bramlett HM, Kraydieh S, Green EJ, Dietrich WD. Temporal and regional patterns of axonal damage following traumatic brain injury: a Beta-amyloid precursor protein Immunocytochemical study in rats. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1997;56:1132–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  148. Goldman SM, Kamel F, Ross GW, Jewell SA, Bhudhikanok GS, Umbach D, et al. Head injury, alpha-synuclein Rep1, and Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2012;71:40–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  149. Franz G, Beer R, Kampfl A, Engelhardt K, Schmutzhard E, Ulmer H, et al. Amyloid beta 1-42 and tau in cerebrospinal fluid after severe traumatic brain injury. Neurology. 2003;60:1457–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  150. Tanzi R, Gusella J, Watkins P, Bruns G, St George-Hyslop P, Van Keuren M, et al. Amyloid beta protein gene: cDNA, mRNA distribution, and genetic linkage near the Alzheimer locus. Science. 1987;235:880–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  151. Braak H, Del Tredici K, Bratzke H, Hamm-Clement J, Sandmann-Keil D, Rüb U. Staging of the intracerebral inclusion body pathology associated with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (preclinical and clinical stages). J Neurol. 2002;249:1–1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  152. Acosta SA, Tajiri N, de la Pena I, Bastawrous M, Sanberg PR, Kaneko Y, et al. Alpha-synuclein as a pathological link between chronic traumatic brain injury and Parkinson’s disease. J Cell Physiol. 2015;230:1024–32.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  153. Gavett BE, Stern RA, McKee AC. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy: a potential late effect of sport-related concussive and Subconcussive head trauma. Clin Sports Med. 2011;30:179–88.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  154. Spillantini MG, Goedert M. Tau protein pathology in neurodegenerative diseases. Trends Neurosci. 1998;21:428–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  155. Pappolla MA, Chyan YJ, Omar TR, Hsiao K, Perry G, Smith MA, et al. Evidence of oxidative stress and in vivo neurotoxicity of beta-amyloid in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease: a chronic oxidative paradigm for testing antioxidant therapies in vivo. Am J Pathol. 1998;152:871.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  156. Poppek D, Keck S, Ermak G, Jung T, Stolzing A, Ullrich O, et al. Phosphorylation inhibits turnover of the tau protein by the proteasome: influence of RCAN1 and oxidative stress. Biochem J. 2006;400:511–20.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  157. Moghe A, Ghare S, Lamoreau B, Mohammad M, Barve S, McClain C, et al. Molecular mechanisms of acrolein toxicity: relevance to human disease. Toxicol Sci. 2015;143:242–55.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  158. Wood PL, Khan MA, Kulow SR, Mahmood SA, Moskal JR. Neurotoxicity of reactive aldehydes: the concept of “aldehyde load” as demonstrated by neuroprotection with hydroxylamines. Brain Res. 2006;1095:190–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  159. Starkstein SE, Jorge R. Dementia after traumatic brain injury. Int Psychogeriatr. 2005;17:S93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  160. Hicks RR, Smith DH, Lowenstein DH, Marie RS, McINTOSH TK. Mild experimental brain injury in the rat induces cognitive deficits associated with regional neuronal loss in the hippocampus. J Neurotrauma. 1993;10:405–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  161. Šimić G, Lucassen PJ, Krsnik Ž, Krušlin B, Kostović I, Winblad B, et al. nNOS expression in reactive Astrocytes correlates with increased cell death related DNA damage in the hippocampus and Entorhinal cortex in Alzheimer’s disease. Exp Neurol. 2000;165:12–26.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  162. Wilde EA, Bigler ED, Hunter JV, Fearing MA, Scheibel RS, Newsome MR, et al. Hippocampus, amygdala, and basal ganglia morphometrics in children after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49:294–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  163. Carlsson M, Carlsson A. Interactions between glutamatergic and monoaminergic systems within the basal ganglia-implications for schizophrenia and Parkinson’s disease. Trends Neurosci. 1990;13:272–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  164. Baugh CM, Stamm JM, Riley DO, Gavett BE, Shenton ME, Lin A, et al. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy: neurodegeneration following repetitive concussive and subconcussive brain trauma. Brain Imaging Behav. 2012;6:244–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  165. Brasure M, Lamberty GJ, Sayer NA, Nelson NW, MacDonald R, Ouellette J, et al. Multidisciplinary Postacute rehabilitation for moderate to severe traumatic brain injury in adults; 2012. p. ES1–ES20.Google Scholar
  166. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Traumatic brain injury in the United States: epidemiology and rehabilitation. 2015.Google Scholar
  167. Menon DK, Schwab K, Wright DW, Maas AI, Demographics, Clinical Assessment Working Group of the I, et al. Position statement: definition of traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:1637–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  168. Marion DW, Curley KC, Schwab K, Hicks RR, mTBI Diagonstics Workgroup. Proceedings of the military mTBI diagnostics workshop, St. Pete Beach, august 2010. J Neurotrauma. 2011, 28:517–26.Google Scholar
  169. Teasdale G, Maas A, Lecky F, Manley G, Stocchetti N, Murray G. The Glasgow coma scale at 40 years: standing the test of time. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:844–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  170. Stein SC. Minor head injury: 13 is an unlucky number. J Trauma. 2001;50:759–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  171. Kulbe JR, Geddes JW. Current status of fluid biomarkers in mild traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol. 2016;275:334–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  172. Townend W, Dibble C, Abid K, Vail A, Sherwood R, Lecky F. Rapid elimination of protein S-100B from serum after minor head trauma. J Neurotrauma. 2006;23:149–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  173. Gatson JW, Barillas J, Hynan LS, Diaz-Arrastia R, Wolf SE, Minei JP. Detection of neurofilament-H in serum as a diagnostic tool to predict injury severity in patients who have suffered mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2014;121:1232–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  174. Papa L, Silvestri S, Brophy GM, Giordano P, Falk JL, Braga CF, et al. GFAP out-performs S100beta in detecting traumatic intracranial lesions on computed tomography in trauma patients with mild traumatic brain injury and those with extracranial lesions. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31:1815–22.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  175. Biberthaler P, Linsenmeier U, Pfeifer KJ, Kroetz M, Mussack T, Kanz KG, et al. Serum S-100B concentration provides additional information fot the indication of computed tomography in patients after minor head injury: a prospective multicenter study. Shock. 2006;25:446–53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  176. Tenovuo O, Posti J, Hossain I, Takalak R, Liedes H, Newcombe V, et al. GFAP and UCH-L1 are not specific biomarkers for mild CT-negative traumatic brain injury. Abstr. 34th Annu. Natl. Neurotrauma Symp. 2016. p. A-20.Google Scholar
  177. Bazarian JJ, Zemlan FP, Mookerjee S, Stigbrand T. Serum S-100B and cleaved-tau are poor predictors of long-term outcome after mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2006;20:759–65.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  178. Kou Z, Gattu R, Kobeissy F, Welch RD, O’Neil BJ, Woodard JL, et al. Combining biochemical and imaging markers to improve diagnosis and characterization of mild traumatic brain injury in the acute setting: results from a pilot study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80296.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  179. Kavalci C, Pekdemir M, Durukan P, Ilhan N, Yildiz M, Serhatlioglu S, et al. The value of serum tau protein for the diagnosis of intracranial injury in minor head trauma. Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25:391–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  180. Luo J, Uchida K, Shi R. Accumulation of acrolein-protein adducts after traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurochem Res. 2005;30:291–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  181. Wood PL, Khan MA, Moskal JR, Todd KG, Tanay VA, Baker G. Aldehyde load in ischemia-reperfusion brain injury: neuroprotection by neutralization of reactive aldehydes with phenelzine. Brain Res. 2006;1122:184–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  182. Putiev YP, Tashpulatov YT, Gafurov TG, Usmanov KU. Infrared study of modified cellulose. Polym Sci USSR. 1964;6:1565–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  183. Kaminskas LM, Pyke SM, Burcham PC. Strong protein adduct trapping accompanies abolition of acrolein-mediated hepatotoxicity by hydralazine in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;310:1003–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  184. Gilgun-Sherki Y, Rosenbaum Z, Melamed E, Offen D. Antioxidant therapy in acute central nervous system injury: current state. Pharmacol Rev. 2002;54:271–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  185. Bains M, Hall ED. Antioxidant therapies in traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1822;2012:675–84.Google Scholar
  186. Kochanek PM, Jackson TC, Ferguson NM, Carlson SW, Simon DW, Brockman EC, et al. Emerging therapies in traumatic brain injury. Semin Neurol. 2015;35:83–100.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  187. Bavarsad Shahripour R, Harrigan MR, Alexandrov AV. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in neurological disorders: mechanisms of action and therapeutic opportunities. Brain Behav. 2014;4:108–22.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017