Skip to main content


  • Review
  • Open Access

Clinic, neuropathology and molecular genetics of frontotemporal dementia: a mini-review

Translational Neurodegeneration20132:8

  • Received: 29 December 2012
  • Accepted: 8 April 2013
  • Published:


Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) represents a group of clinically, neuropathologically and genetically heterogeneous disorders with plenty of overlaps between the neurodegenerative mechanism and the clinical phenotype. FTLD is pathologically characterized by the frontal and temporal lobar atrophy. Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) clinically presents with abnormalities of behavior and personality and language impairments variants. The clinical spectrum of FTD encompasses distinct canonical syndromes: behavioural variant of FTD (bvFTD) and primary progressive aphasia. The later includes nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA (nfvPPA or PNFA), semantic variant PPA (svPPA or SD) and logopenic variant PPA (lvPPA). In addition, there is also overlap of FTD with motor neuron disease (FTD-MND or FTD-ALS), as well as the parkinsonian syndromes, progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal syndrome (CBS). The FTLD spectrum disorders are based upon the predominant neuropathological proteins (containing inclusions of hyperphosphorylated tau or ubiquitin protein, e.g transactive response (TAR) DNA-binding protein 43 kDa (TDP-43) and fusedin-sarcoma protein in neurons and glial cells) into three main categories: (1) microtubule-associated protein tau (FTLD-Tau); (2) TAR DNA-binding protein-43 (FTLD-TDP); and (3) fused in sarcoma protein (FTLD-FUS). There are five main genes mutations leading clinical and pathological variants in FTLD that identified by molecular genetic studies, which are chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9ORF72) gene, granulin (GRN) gene, microtubule associated protein tau gene (MAPT), the gene encoding valosin-containing protein (VCP) and the charged multivesicular body protein 2B (CHMP2B). In this review, recent advances on the different clinic variants, neuroimaging, genetics, pathological subtypes and clinicopathological associations of FTD will be discussed.


  • bvFTD
  • Nonfluent/agrammatic variant
  • Semantic variant
  • Logopenic variant
  • Molecular genetics
  • MAPT
  • GRN
  • C9ORF72


Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) represents a group of clinically, neuropathologically and genetically heterogeneous disorders. It is a range of progressive dementia syndromes associated with focal atrophy of the orbitomesial frontal and anterior temporal lobes. And the term frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) to describe the pathological syndrome.

In 1892, Arnold Pick described a patient with progressive aphasia and lobar atrophy [1]. In 1911, Alois Alzheimer described the histopathological status related to these patients, pointing the absence of senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, and the presence of argyrophilic neuronal inclusions (later called “Pick bodies”) and swollen cells (later called “Pick cells”) at neuropathological examination [2]. However, during the 20th century, these patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration were generically referred to as patients with dementia, being often diagnosed with Alzheimer disease (AD) [2]. In 1994, two major research groups from Lund and Manchester proposed clinical and neuropathological criteria for the diagnosis of FTD [3]. In 1998, Neary et al [4] reported a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria of frontotemporal lobar degeneration in the American Academy of Neurology (AAN).

FTD often begins when the patient is in the fifth to seventh decades. Epidemiological studies suggest that FTD is the second most common cause of dementia in individuals younger than 65 and is just less common than Alzheimer’s disease (AD) within this age group [2, 5]. Of over 65 years old dementia, the incidence of FTD ranks fourth, the top three is Alzheimer’s disease, Lewy body dementia and vascular dementia [57]. There do not appear to be any clear gender differences in susceptibility [811]. Among the FTD clinical syndromes, sex distribution appears to vary from one subtype to the next. Several studies report a male predominance in bvFTD and SD, and a female predominance in PNFA [5, 12]. There is a wide range in durations of illness (2-20 years) partly reflecting different underlying pathologies.

In the past few years, significant advances have been seen in the etiology, pathogenesis, and genetics, pathology and clinical phenotype of FTD, and many new terminology and classification of FTD have emerged. In this review, recent advances on the different clinical variant phenotypes, neuroimaging, hereditary forms, pathological subtypes and clinicopathological associations of FTD will be discussed.

FTLD clinical presentation: classification and characteristics

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) includes a group of progressive degenerative disorders characterised by progressive behavioural change, executive dysfunction and language difficulties [13]. Unlike AD, behavioral symptoms predominate in the early stages of FTLD. The clinical heterogeneity in familial and sporadic forms of FTD is remarkable, with patients demonstrating variable mixtures of disinhibition, dementia, PSP, CBD, and motor neuron disease [13, 14]. Early symptoms are divided among cognitive, behavioral, and sometimes motor abnormalities, reflecting degeneration of the anterior frontal and temporal regions, basal ganglia, and motor neurons [13, 14]. FTLD is a powerful model to study emotion, social cognition and language organization in the brain.

Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD)

bvFTD has the highest prevalence amongst the FTD clinical syndromes, accounting for approximately 70% of all FTD cases [2, 5]. The onset of bvFTD is typically before the age of 65 years, with an average onset age of 58 years [12, 15]. Patients with this clinical variant present with marked changes in personality and behaviour and with relative preservation of the cognitive functions praxis, gnosia and memory [13, 16]. Common behavioral deficits include apathy, disinhibition, weight gain, food fetishes, compulsions, euphoria, and an absence of insight into their condition. Poor business decisions and difficulty organizing work tasks are common. Cognitive testing typically reveals spared memory but impaired executive functions [3, 13, 17]. bvFTD has been associated with symmetrical ventromedial frontal, orbital frontal, and insular atrophy and left anterior cingulate atrophy [18]. Behavioural assessment is at the core of assessment in patients with potential bvFTD and seems to be more sensitive in distinguishing bvFTD from AD than standard cognitive testing. The ‘International Behavioral Variant FTD Criteria Consortium’ developed international consensus criteria for bvFTD. Subclassifications were made in possible bvFTD defined by clinical criteria, probable bvFTD supported by neuroimaging data, and definite bvFTD confirmation by neuropathological evidence or a pathogenic mutation [17].

Primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

PPA is a language disorder that involves changes in the ability to speak, read, write and understand what others are saying. It is associated with early temporal lobe atrophy or brain lesions around the lateral fissure. PPA represents a spectrum of selective language disorders and the variant of PPA might provide clues to the underlying pathology [19]. Currently cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers have limited ability to identify PPA reliably, which might be explained by the pathological heterogeneity. An indication of lower Aβ1-40 levels or the lower T-tau to Aβ1-42 ratio in FTD, might be useful to distinguish patients from subjects AD and control subjects [20, 21]. In 2011, criteria were adopted for the classification of PPA into three clinical subtypes: nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA (nfvPPA or PNFA), semantic variant PPA (svPPA or SD) and logopenic variant PPA (lvPPA) [22]. The proposal is an important step forward in establishing the consistency of terminology and classification of PPA. The diagnostic recommendations include two steps. First, the patient should meet the basic standard of PPA, which is an initial presentation of significant damage to language and accompanied by limited daily living skills and other cognitive impairment. Second, we need to assess the main language domains, including verbal generation, repeat, and understanding of words and syntax, naming, semantic knowledge and reading/spelling characteristics. Finally, clinical variants will be divided basing on specific speech and language features characteristic of each subtype. Classification can then be further specified as “imaging-supported” if the expected pattern of atrophy is found and “with definite pathology” if pathologic or genetic data are available. Therefore, the new proposal has a clear practical significance.

nfvPPA or PNFA is the second most prevalent presentation of FTLD, accounting for a large 25% [12]. The feature of nfvPPA includes grammatical error making agrammatism and/or laborious speech, but relatively preserved language comprehension. Apraxia of speech (AOS) or orofacial apraxia is frequently accompanying the aphasia [15]. Semantic variant PPA (svPPA) or SD presents in 20–25% of the FTLD patients [12]. svPPA presents a significantly impaired naming ability and word comprehension, while speech production is spared [22, 23]. LvPPA or logopenic progressive aphasia [24] is marked by impaired word finding and difficult repetition. lvPPA showes an impaired ability to repeat sentences or phrases, spontaneous speech and a single word extracting when naming. Unlike other FTD subtypes, lvPPA generally does not produce changes in behavior or personality until later stages of the disease. Most people with progressive aphasia maintain the ability to care for themselves, keep up outside interests and, in some instances, remain employed for a few years after onset of the disorder. LPA is mostly associated with a neuropathological diagnosis of AD [25]. Clinical distinction between bvFTD, nfvPPA and svPPA is often complicated for that overlap of the clinical syndromes between them can occur in advanced stages of disease.

FTLD overlaps with other clinical syndrome

The subcortical nuclei and motor systems are involves in FTLD variants. Motor neuron dysfunction (MND) has been described in 40% of the FTLD patients, referred to as FTLD-MND. The common comorbidity of Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) with behavior abnormality, cognitive impairment or dementia has been noticed [26, 27]. FTLD may precede, follow or coincide with the onset of motor symptoms [28]. Other disorders are closely related to FTLD, including progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) syndromes, corticobasal syndrome (CBS), FTD with parkinsonism (FTDP) and argyrophilic grain disease (AGD). PSP and CBS are two common atypical parkinsonian syndromes demonstrating cognitive and behaviour disorders that overlap with FTD. Of them, behavioral and cognitive dysfunction promotes the development of dementia. And extrapyramidal system symptoms present as bradykinesia, abnormal posture, rigidity, but tremor uncommon. The co-occurrence of AGD in ALS is not uncommon, and comparable with that in a number of diseases belonging to the tauopathies or α-synucleinopathies [29]. Motion system damage presents as muscle atrophy. FTDP-17 showing genetic linkage to chromosome 17, presents with a clinical syndrome of autosomal dominant disinhibition, dementia, parkinsonism, and amyotrophy [30]. The clinical picture resembles bvFTD, while cognitive deficits include anterograde memory dysfunction in an early stage, later the deterioration of visuospatial function, orientation and global memory are gradually presented. Motor signs typically include the symmetrical bradykinesia without resting tremor, in combination with axial rigidity and postural instability. The early clinical presentation of AGD is similar to AD but it is less aggressive, with patients maintain mild cognitive impairment (MCI) for many years [31].

Neuroimaging in FTLD

Neuroimaging plays a critical role in diagnosis of FTD. Neuroimaging investigations can reliably differentiate FTLD subtypes from other dementias, and can help clinical diagnostics based on neuropsychiatric symptoms. Different clinical variatents have different forms of brain atrophy, which can be used for some important clues for early clinical differential diagnosis. DTI can detect white matter damage, different subtypes of white matter injury also help clinical early differential diagnosis of clinical subtypes of FTLD [32]. Functional neuroimaging techniques, such as [99mTc]-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) [33] or [18 F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET are increasingly being used to help with the diagnosis of FTLD [34]. Arterial spin labeling imaging (ASL) like FDG-PET can be used for showing the hypometabolism in brain regions. Hypometabolism on FDG-PET is detected consistently and reliably in frontal brain regions in patients with bvFTD compared with those with AD, who show posterior cingulate hypometabolism early in the disease process [34]. However, in patients showing clear brain atrophy on structural MRI, little additional diagnostic benefit is gained by doing a PET scan, because focal atrophy is a positive predictive marker of FTD. The imaging presentation of nfvPPA indicates that predominant left posterior fronto-insular atrophy on MRI or predominant left posterior fronto-insular hypoperfusion or hypometabolism on SPECT or PET. Imaging-supported svPPA show predominant anterior temporal lobe atrophy and/or these brain regions hypoperfusion or hypometabolism on SPECT or PET. The imaging of lvPPA must show at least one of predominant left posterior perisylvian or parietal atrophy on MRI and/or hypoperfusion or hypometabolism on SPECT or PET [22, 25, 3537].

Future in FTLD are very similar to imaging in AD–early detection, molecular diagnosis, monitor disease progression and validate and implement disease modifying therapies. Specific anatomic patterns in FTLD, and an amyloid-PET neuroimaging, which uses the amyloid-β-detecting 11C-Pittsburgh compound B, has shown promising results in discriminating or rule-out atypical AD and FTD cases [38, 39] particularly those presenting with language deficits rather than behavioural changes. Micro PET with 18 F-THK523 in Tau transgenic mice have been reported [40]. Tau specific imaging scanner that uses the 18 F-THK523 may be a promising technique coming soon in future [40].

FTLD Neuropathology and cliniconeuropathological correlations


The subtypes of underlying pathological changes in patients with FTD are classified on the basis of the pattern of protein deposition, and are referred to collectively as frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Under a microscope, common pathologic changes of FTLD are atrophy brain region presenting neuronal loss, spongy change and gliosis in cortices of atrophied frontal and temporal lobes [41, 42].

FTD have identified novel genetic defects and a chromosomal locus in hereditary forms of FTLD, as well as novel clinicneuropathological associations. Immunohistochemistry allows subcategorization of these disorders into specific proteinopathies based on the major constituent of the inclusions.
  1. (1)

    FTLD-tau: One subtype is presented as neurons  and glial cells containing inclusions of  hyperphosphorylated tau protein, referred to as  FTLD-tau [43]. Tau pathology was associated with  FTD with parkinsonism, PSP syndromes [44], CBS  [45] and AGD [31].

  2. (2)

    FTLD-Ubiquitin or FTLD-U: Over 50% of the  FTLD patients presented with tau-negative  ubiquitin staining inclusions, referred to as FTLD- Ubiquitin or FTLD-U [46]. In 80–95% of this  group, inclusions were found to be composed of  transactive response (TAR) DNA-binding protein  43 kDa (TDP-43) [4749], referred to as FTLD-TDP  [50], or TDP-43-negative FTLD-U cases having  inclusions of fusedin-sarcoma protein (FUS), referred  to as FTLD-FUS [43, 49, 51, 52]. However, in a small  number of FTLD-U patients, the inclusion protein  remains unclear. This group is referred to as FTLD- ubiquitin proteasome system (FTLD-UPS) [46, 53].

  3. (3)

    Dementia lacking distinctive histopathology  (DLDH) [54, 55].

  4. (4)

    Other rare types: dementia with basophilic  inclusion body, neuronal intermediate filament  inclusion disease [52].


Association between pathology and clinical phenotype

Associations were noted between the clinical FTLD subtypes and underlying proteinopathies, but a strict one to one relationship is lacking. bvFTD is mostly associated with FTLD-TDP43, some cases are also correlated with FTLD-tau (PiD subtype). An FTLD-FUS proteinopathy is invariantly associated with a clinical diagnosis of bvFTD, either with or without the signs of MND. Microscopic assessment of nfaPPA at autopsy often reveals FTLD associated with a tauopathy (FTLD-tau). nfaPPA is commonly associated with tau pathology, especially when AOS or orofacial apraxia is present. In most cases, the pathology underlying nfaPPA was mixed, including FTLD-tau and FTLD-TDP43, but with a predominance of FTLD-tau pathology. SvPPA is, in most cases, linked with TDP-43-immunoreactive pathology, although tau pathology is sometimes observed. Some patients with predominantly right temporal lobe atrophy (RTLA) are usually diagnosed clinically with either bvFTD or svPPA [56]. It has been suggested that patients with bvFTD and RTLA have FTLD-tau pathology, whereas patients with svPPA and RTLA have FTLD-TDP43 pathology [56]. svPPA patients who often present with acalculia is associated with FTLD-tau [57]. LvPA is predominantly associated with AD pathology. Many patients with lvPPA often have underlying AD pathology [5860]. CSF tau:amyloid-β ratio [37] and PiB PET imaging [25] studies can be helpful in the identification of patients who are more likely to have lvPPA than nfaPPA. A recent study showed that 93% of patients with lvPPA on amyloid PET imaging was found PiB positive, but svPPA only 9%, nfvPPA is 13%, which suggests that there is some common pathological features between lvPPA and AD [59].

Tau pathology was also associated with FTLD with parkinsonism, PSP, CBD, AGD and Pick bodies (PiD) [30, 44, 61]. Similarly, TDP-43 and FUS proteinopathies are also commonly found in MND with or without FTLD [52]. Although these are relatively strong associations, they are not absolute, and it is currently not possible to predict with certainty the underlying pathology of specific FTLD syndromes.

Extrapyramidal system symptoms accompanied with apraxia indicates the presence of CBS, which mostly attributes to Tau disease. While dementia with FTLD-MND syndrome mostly attributes to TDP-43 pathology [15, 45, 57]. These suggest that it is contributing to therapeutic strategy for FTLD through elucidating the relationship between pathological and clinical presentation.

Molecular genetics

Approximately 40% of patients with FTD have a family history [8]. bvFTD is the most prominent subtype with family history, especially when concomitant symptoms of MND are present (60%), while SvPPA appeared to be the least hereditary FTLD subtype (<20%) [62]. Molecular genetic studies have identified several common (MAPT, GRN) and rare (VCP, CHMP2B, TARDBP, FUS) genetic factors in hereditary FTLD over recent years. In 1998 microtubule associated protein tau (MAPT) gene was found, which located on chromosome 17q21.32, in which 13% of the cases is FTDP-17, those who have parkinson-like symptoms [63]. In 2004, the gene encoding valosin-containing protein (VCP) gene was found, located on chromosome 9p13.3, which is associated with the genes that cause FTLD in association with inclusion body myopathy and Paget’s disease [64, 65]. In 2005, the charged multivesicular body protein 2B (CHMP2B, also known as chromatin-modifying protein 2B) gene mutations, located on chromosome 3p11.2, was discovered in a large Danish cohort with familial FTLD [66, 67]. In 2006, a mutated gene located on chromosome 17q21.31 are identified as the granule protein precursor (PGRN), only 1.7 M nucleotide away from the MAPT [68, 69]. Approximately 10% of patients with FTLD is associated with this gene. In 2011, chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9ORF72) gene was newly identified in FTLD [70, 71].

Overall, patients with mutations in GRN, MAPT and C9ORF72 together account for at least 17% of total FTD cases [53, 72]. Summed C9ORF72, GRN and MAPT mutation frequencies were 32-40% [70, 73]. Mutations in VCP and CHMP2B are rare, each explaining less than 1% of the familial FTLD.

The MAPT gene mutations often lead to FTLD-Tau pathological changes. The Both PGRN and C9ORF72 mutations can cause FTLD-TDP-43. The symmetry frontal lobe atrophy in bvFTD patients is associated with C9ORF72 and MAPT gene mutations, whereas the asymmetry of frontal lobe atrophy in bvFTD patients is associated with PGRN gene mutations [74]. The large hexanucleotide repeat expansion located within the non-coding portion of C9ORF72 is the cause of chromosome 9-linked ALS and FTLD [70]. These suggest that specific gene mutations may affect the patterns of neuroanatomic injury in the development of frontal lobar atrophy.

C9ORF72 is expressed as three major transcripts and the expanded G4C2 repeat is located in the proximal regulatory region of C9ORF72[70, 73], upstream of one and in the first intron of the two other transcripts. Repeat expansion results in near complete loss of expression of the major gene transcripts. The pathogenic expansion was non-penetrant in individuals younger than 35 years, 50% penetrant by 58 years, and almost fully penetrant by 80 years. In normal population, the size of the G4C2 repeat ranges from 3 to 25 units, which is expanded to at least 60 units in FTLD patients [70, 71, 73].

The clinical phenotype of C9ORF72 mutation often presents as bvFTD or ALS or FTD co-morbidities ALS. In patients with bvFTD, C9ORF72 mutation is more common than MAPT or PGRN. Anxiety or agitation, and memory dysfunction (often episodic memory) is a common clinical feature. Those cases underlines that the hexanucleotide repeat expansion in chromosome 9 could be also associated with early onset psychiatric presentations [75]. Overexpressed p-62 inclusion body lesions in the cerebellum is one of pathological features [76]. Neuroimaging presents as the symmetrical frontal and/or temporal lobe atrophy, and parietal, occipital and cerebellar atrophy can also appear. Therefore, C9ORF72 mutation is not only associated with cortical anatomic site but also with subcortical structures. However, it is unclear for the exact mechanism of action of this “repeat amplification C9ORF72 gene”.

The clinical and pathological heterogeneity in FTLD causes a challenge for diagnosis of FTLD. A helpful supplement for clinical evaluation using genetics and biological markers testing can significantly improve the forecast of potential histopathology in vivo. We summarize clinical phenotypes, molecular pathological and genetic spectrum in FTLD in Table 1. And the profile of main genes mutations and its possible disease mechanisms in FTLD is shown in Table 2.
Table 1

Clinical phenotypes, pathological and molecular genetic spectrum in FTLD[13, 19, 22, 35, 72, 77, 78]

Core clinical feature

Praxiological obstacle


Extrapyramidal symptoms + praxiological obstacle

Dyskinesia + praxiological obstacle

Clinical syndrome

Behavioral variant Frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD)

Primary progressive aphasia(PPA)

Corticobasal degeneration (CBD)

progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP)



nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA (nfvPPA)

Semantics variation (svPPA)

logopenic variant PPA (lvPPA)


Brain morphologically affected parts

Prefrontal lobe and temporal lobe

Left posterior frontal lobe, insula

The front/ventral temporal lobe

left posterior superior temporal lobe and medial parietal lobe

Frontal and temporal lobe, Basal ganglia

Basal ganglia and brainstem

Cortex and motor neuron

Biochemistry and Neuropathology

FTLD-Tau (Pick type, 3R-tau) FTLD-TDP43

FTLD-Tau more than FTLD-TDP43, AD like pathological visible

Most belongs to FTLD-TDP43; AD like pathological rare

AD-like pathological common; FTLD-TDP43 visible

FTLD-Tau (CBD type,4R-tau) common

FTLD-Tau (PSP type, 4R-tau) common


Causative and Associated Genes




































Note: 3R tau: three microtubulebinding repeats; 4R tau:four microtubule-binding repeats.

Table 2

The profile of main genes mutation and its possible disease mechanisms in FTLD

Gene symbol






Full name

Microtubule -associated protein tau

Chromosome 9 open reading frame 72


Valosin containing protein

Chromatin modifying protein 2B

Chromosomal localization







MAPT gives rise to six isoforms: three isoforms containing three amino-acid repeats (3R), and three isoforms with four repeats (4R) [79].

expressed as three major transcripts, the expanded G4C2 repeat is located in the proximal regulatory region of C9ORF72[70, 73].

encodes progranulin, a ubiquitously expressed growth factor precursor consisting of 7.5 granulin peptides.

Encodes a ubiquitously expressed member of a family of ATPases associated with a wide range of cellular functions [85].

Encodes a component of the heteromeric ESCRT-III complex with functions in the endosomal-lysosomal and the autophagic protein degradation pathway.

Functions and possible role in the disease mechanism

Mutations result in a change in ratio of 3R to 4R tau isoforms. Mutations affect the normal function of the tau protein to stabilise microtubules, increase the tendency of tau to form neurotoxic aggregates and disturb neuronal plasticity and axonal transport [80].

Repeat expansion results in near complete loss of the major gene transcripts. And accumulation of transcripts harboring the expanded G4C2 repeat in nuclear RNA foci [70].

a wide range of biological processes such as inflammation and wound repair, or in pathological conditions including tumorigenesis [82].

mutations reside at the interface between the D1 ATPase and the N-domain of the CDC48-like protein [85].

Expressed in neurons of all major brain regions. It is critical for development, sexual differentiation [88] and neuronal survival [89].

G4C2 repeat leads to neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions throughout theentire cortical thickness [81].

Neurotrophic function involved in neuronal survival and neurite outgrowth [83, 84].

mutations disturb ubiquitin-proteasome mediated protein degradation, autophagy, or both [86, 87].

Mutations affect the C-terminal end of the protein due to aberrant splicing [78].


unidentified mechanisms exist.


Estimated mutation frequency [[69, 72, 79, 81, 90]







In this review, we have systematically updated current understanding on clinical, genetic, neuropathological, and neuroimaging perspectives of FTD. This review aims to arouse awareness of FTD among clinicians, in particular when the overlapping clinical and neuroimaging characteristic features among dementia and different subtypes of FTD remain great challenges for clinicians. Identification of biomarkers for clinical diagnosis and differentiation FTD from other dementia is warranted for future studies. Gene diagnosis test should be considered for familial cases suspected with FTD in clinic practice. Longitudinal clinicopathological correlation studies will further elucidate the network functions of human brain in this complex disorder with behaviour, speech and motor abnormality. With further understanding of the genetics, clinical and neuropathological basis of FTD, we can visualise that FTD will be further clinically defined. And new consensus will be developed for better guidance in clinical practice.



This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81200991), Outstanding Young Persons’ Research Program for Higher Education of Fujian Province, China (JA10123), Major Project of Fujian Science and Technology Bureau (2009D061).

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Neurology, Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, TX, 350001, China
Key Laboratory of Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative Disease, Fujian Institute of Geriatrics, Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China
Centre of Neurobiology, Fujian Medical University, 88 Jiaotong Road, Fuzhou, TX, 350001, China


  1. Rossor MN: Pick’s disease: a clinical overview. Neurology 2001, 56: S3-S5. 10.1212/WNL.56.suppl_4.S3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Snowden JS, Neary D, Mann DM: Frontotemporal dementia. Br J Psychiatry 2002, 180: 140-143. 10.1192/bjp.180.2.140View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. The Lund and Manchester Groups: Clinical and neuropathological criteria for frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994, 57: 416-418.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, Passant U, Stuss D, Black S, Freedman M, Kertesz A, Robert PH, Albert M: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology 1998, 51: 1546-1554. 10.1212/WNL.51.6.1546View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ratnavalli E, Brayne C, Dawson K, Hodges JR: The prevalence of frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2002, 58: 1615-1621. 10.1212/WNL.58.11.1615View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Arvanitakis Z: Update on frontotemporal dementia. Neurologist 2010, 16: 16-22. 10.1097/NRL.0b013e3181b1d5c6PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barker WW, Luis CA, Kashuba A, Luis M, Harwood DG, Loewenstein D, Waters C, Jimison P, Shepherd E, Sevush S: Relative frequencies of Alzheimer disease, Lewy body, vascular and frontotemporal dementia, and hippocampal sclerosis in the State of Florida Brain Bank. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2002, 16: 203-212. 10.1097/00002093-200210000-00001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Rosso SM, Donker Kaat L, Baks T, Joosse M, de Koning I, Pijnenburg Y, de Jong D, Dooijes D, Kamphorst W, Ravid R: Frontotemporal dementia in The Netherlands: patient characteristics and prevalence estimates from a population-based study. Brain 2003, 126: 2016-2022. 10.1093/brain/awg204View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mercy L, Hodges JR, Dawson K, Barker RA, Brayne C: Incidence of early-onset dementias in Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom. Neurology 2008, 71: 1496-1499. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000334277.16896.faView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ikeda M, Ishikawa T, Tanabe H: Epidemiology of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2004, 17: 265-268. 10.1159/000077151View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hou CE, Yaffe K, Perez-Stable EJ, Miller BL: Frequency of dementia etiologies in four ethnic groups. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2006, 22: 42-47. 10.1159/000093217View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson JK, Diehl J, Mendez MF, Neuhaus J, Shapira JS, Forman M, Chute DJ, Roberson ED, Pace-Savitsky C, Neumann M: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: demographic characteristics of 353 patients. Arch Neurol 2005, 62: 925-930. 10.1001/archneur.62.6.925PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Piguet O, Hornberger M, Mioshi E, Hodges JR: Behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia: diagnosis, clinical staging, and management. Lancet Neurol 2011, 10: 162-172. 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70299-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lillo P, Garcin B, Hornberger M, Bak TH, Hodges JR: Neurobehavioral features in frontotemporal dementia with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch Neurol 2010, 67: 826-830. 10.1001/archneurol.2010.146View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Josephs KA, Hodges JR, Snowden JS, Mackenzie IR, Neumann M, Mann DM, Dickson DW: Neuropathological background of phenotypical variability in frontotemporal dementia. Acta Neuropathol 2011, 122: 137-153. 10.1007/s00401-011-0839-6PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bathgate D, Snowden JS, Varma A, Blackshaw A, Neary D: Behaviour in frontotemporal dementia, Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Acta Neurol Scand 2001, 103: 367-378. 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2001.2000236.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, Mendez MF, Kramer JH, Neuhaus J, van Swieten JC, Seelaar H, Dopper EG, Onyike CU: Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 2011, 134: 2456-2477. 10.1093/brain/awr179PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Rohrer JD, Lashley T, Schott JM, Warren JE, Mead S, Isaacs AM, Beck J, Hardy J, de Silva R, Warrington E: Clinical and neuroanatomical signatures of tissue pathology in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Brain 2011, 134: 2565-2581. 10.1093/brain/awr198PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Grossman M: Primary progressive aphasia: clinicopathological correlations. Nat Rev Neurol 2010, 6: 88-97. 10.1038/nrneurol.2009.216PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Irwin DJ, McMillan CT, Toledo JB, Arnold SE, Shaw LM, Wang LS, Van Deerlin V, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ, Grossman M: Comparison of cerebrospinal fluid levels of tau and Abeta 1-42 in Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal degeneration using 2 analytical platforms. Arch Neurol 2012, 69: 1018-1025. 10.1001/archneurol.2012.26PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Verwey NA, Kester MI, van der Flier WM, Veerhuis R, Berkhof H, Twaalfhoven H, Blankenstein MA, Scheltens AP, Pijnenburg YA: Additional value of CSF amyloid-beta 40 levels in the differentiation between FTLD and control subjects. J Alzheimers Dis 2010, 20: 445-452.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, Kertesz A, Mendez M, Cappa SF, Ogar JM, Rohrer JD, Black S, Boeve BF: Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology 2011, 76: 1006-1014. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821103e6PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Snowden JS, Thompson JC, Stopford CL, Richardson AM, Gerhard A, Neary D, Mann DM: The clinical diagnosis of early-onset dementias: diagnostic accuracy and clinicopathological relationships. Brain 2011, 134: 2478-2492. 10.1093/brain/awr189View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gorno-Tempini ML, Brambati SM, Ginex V, Ogar J, Dronkers NF, Marcone A, Perani D, Garibotto V, Cappa SF, Miller BL: The logopenic/phonological variant of primary progressive aphasia. Neurology 2008, 71: 1227-1234. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000320506.79811.daPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rabinovici GD, Jagust WJ, Furst AJ, Ogar JM, Racine CA, Mormino EC, O’Neil JP, Lal RA, Dronkers NF, Miller BL: Abeta amyloid and glucose metabolism in three variants of primary progressive aphasia. Ann Neurol 2008, 64: 388-401. 10.1002/ana.21451PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Phukan J, Pender NP, Hardiman O: Cognitive impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2007, 6: 994-1003. 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70265-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ringholz GM, Appel SH, Bradshaw M, Cooke NA, Mosnik DM, Schulz PE: Prevalence and patterns of cognitive impairment in sporadic ALS. Neurology 2005, 65: 586-590. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000172911.39167.b6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. van Langenhove T, van der Zee J, van Broeckhoven C: The molecular basis of the frontotemporal lobar degeneration-amyotrophic lateral sclerosis spectrum. Ann Med 2012, 44: 817-828. 10.3109/07853890.2012.665471PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Soma K, Fu YJ, Wakabayashi K, Onodera O, Kakita A, Takahashi H: Co-occurrence of argyrophilic grain disease in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2012, 38: 54-60. 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2011.01175.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Spillantini MG, Bird TD, Ghetti B: Frontotemporal dementia and Parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17: a new group of tauopathies. Brain Pathol 1998, 8: 387-402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferrer I, Santpere G, van Leeuwen FW: Argyrophilic grain disease. Brain 2008, 131: 1416-1432. 10.1093/brain/awm305View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang Y, Schuff N, Du AT, Rosen HJ, Kramer JH, Gorno-Tempini ML, Miller BL, Weiner MW: White matter damage in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease measured by diffusion MRI. Brain 2009, 132: 2579-2592. 10.1093/brain/awp071PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Varma AR, Adams W, Lloyd JJ, Carson KJ, Snowden JS, Testa HJ, Jackson A, Neary D: Diagnostic patterns of regional atrophy on MRI and regional cerebral blood flow change on SPECT in young onset patients with Alzheimer’s disease, frontotemporal dementia and vascular dementia. Acta Neurol Scand 2002, 105: 261-269. 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2002.1o148.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kanda T, Ishii K, Uemura T, Miyamoto N, Yoshikawa T, Kono AK, Mori E: Comparison of grey matter and metabolic reductions in frontotemporal dementia using FDG-PET and voxel-based morphometric MR studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008, 35: 2227-2234. 10.1007/s00259-008-0871-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Grossman M: The non-fluent/agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia. Lancet Neurol 2012, 11: 545-555. 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70099-6PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Grossman M, Powers J, Ash S, McMillan C, Burkholder L, Irwin D, Trojanowski JQ: Disruption of large-scale neural networks in non-fluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia associated with frontotemporal degeneration pathology. Brain Lang 2012. in Press, doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.10.005. [Epub ahead of print], PMID: 23218686Google Scholar
  37. Hu WT, McMillan C, Libon D, Leight S, Forman M, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ, Grossman M: Multimodal predictors for Alzheimer disease in nonfluent primary progressive aphasia. Neurology 2010, 75: 595-602. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ed9c52PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Engler H, Santillo AF, Wang SX, Lindau M, Savitcheva I, Nordberg A, Lannfelt L, Langstrom B, Kilander L: In vivo amyloid imaging with PET in frontotemporal dementia. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008, 35: 100-106. 10.1007/s00259-007-0523-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rowe CC, Ng S, Ackermann U, Gong SJ, Pike K, Savage G, Cowie TF, Dickinson KL, Maruff P, Darby D: Imaging beta-amyloid burden in aging and dementia. Neurology 2007, 68: 1718-1725. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000261919.22630.eaView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Fodero-Tavoletti MT, Okamura N, Furumoto S, Mulligan RS, Connor AR, McLean CA, Cao D, Rigopoulos A, Cartwright GA, O’Keefe G: 18 F-THK523: a novel in vivo tau imaging ligand for Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2011, 134: 1089-1100. 10.1093/brain/awr038View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Broe M, Hodges JR, Schofield E, Shepherd CE, Kril JJ, Halliday GM: Staging disease severity in pathologically confirmed cases of frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2003, 60: 1005-1011. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000052685.09194.39View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kersaitis C, Halliday GM, Kril JJ: Regional and cellular pathology in frontotemporal dementia: relationship to stage of disease in cases with and without Pick bodies. Acta Neuropathol 2004, 108: 515-523. 10.1007/s00401-004-0917-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mackenzie IR, Rademakers R, Neumann M: TDP-43 and FUS in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Lancet Neurol 2010, 9: 995-1007. 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70195-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hoglinger GU, Melhem NM, Dickson DW, Sleiman PM, Wang LS, Klei L, Rademakers R, de Silva R, Litvan I, Riley DE: Identification of common variants influencing risk of the tauopathy progressive supranuclear palsy. Nat Genet 2011, 43: 699-705. 10.1038/ng.859PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Boeve BF: The multiple phenotypes of corticobasal syndrome and corticobasal degeneration: implications for further study. J Mol Neurosci 2011, 45: 350-353. 10.1007/s12031-011-9624-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Mackenzie IR, Neumann M, Bigio EH, Cairns NJ, Alafuzoff I, Kril J, Kovacs GG, Ghetti B, Halliday G, Holm IE: Nomenclature for neuropathologic subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: consensus recommendations. Acta Neuropathol 2009, 117: 15-18. 10.1007/s00401-008-0460-5PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Benajiba L, Le Ber I, Camuzat A, Lacoste M, Thomas-Anterion C, Couratier P, Legallic S, Salachas F, Hannequin D, Decousus M: TARDBP mutations in motoneuron disease with frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Ann Neurol 2009, 65: 470-473. 10.1002/ana.21612View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Neumann M, Sampathu DM, Kwong LK, Truax AC, Micsenyi MC, Chou TT, Bruce J, Schuck T, Grossman M, Clark CM: Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science 2006, 314: 130-133. 10.1126/science.1134108View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Mackenzie IR, Foti D, Woulfe J, Hurwitz TA: Atypical frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive, TDP-43-negative neuronal inclusions. Brain 2008, 131: 1282-1293.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Grossman M, Wood EM, Moore P, Neumann M, Kwong L, Forman MS, Clark CM, McCluskey LF, Miller BL, Lee VM: TDP-43 pathologic lesions and clinical phenotype in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive inclusions. Arch Neurol 2007, 64: 1449-1454. 10.1001/archneur.64.10.1449View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Mackenzie IR, Munoz DG, Kusaka H, Yokota O, Ishihara K, Roeber S, Kretzschmar HA, Cairns NJ, Neumann M: Distinct pathological subtypes of FTLD-FUS. Acta Neuropathol 2011, 121: 207-218. 10.1007/s00401-010-0764-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Roeber S, Mackenzie IR, Kretzschmar HA, Neumann M: TDP-43-negative FTLD-U is a significant new clinico-pathological subtype of FTLD. Acta Neuropathol 2008, 116: 147-157. 10.1007/s00401-008-0395-xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Rohrer JD, Guerreiro R, Vandrovcova J, Uphill J, Reiman D, Beck J, Isaacs AM, Authier A, Ferrari R, Fox NC: The heritability and genetics of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology 2009, 73: 1451-1456. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181bf997aPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Giannakopoulos P, Hof PR, Bouras C: Dementia lacking distinctive histopathology: clinicopathological evaluation of 32 cases. Acta Neuropathol 1995, 89: 346-355. 10.1007/BF00309628View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Josephs KA, Jones AG, Dickson DW: Hippocampal sclerosis and ubiquitin-positive inclusions in dementia lacking distinctive histopathology. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2004, 17: 342-345. 10.1159/000077168View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Gainotti G: Different patterns of famous people recognition disorders in patients with right and left anterior temporal lesions: a systematic review. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45: 1591-1607. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.12.013View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Rabinovici GD, Miller BL: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. CNS Drugs 2010, 24: 375-398. 10.2165/11533100-000000000-00000PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Josephs KA, Whitwell JL, Duffy JR, Vanvoorst WA, Strand EA, Hu WT, Boeve BF, Graff-Radford NR, Parisi JE, Knopman DS: Progressive aphasia secondary to Alzheimer disease vs FTLD pathology. Neurology 2008, 70: 25-34. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000287073.12737.35PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Mesulam M, Wicklund A, Johnson N, Rogalski E, Leger GC, Rademaker A, Weintraub S, Bigio EH: Alzheimer and frontotemporal pathology in subsets of primary progressive aphasia. Ann Neurol 2008, 63: 709-719. 10.1002/ana.21388PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Rohrer JD, Rossor MN, Warren JD: Alzheimer’s pathology in primary progressive aphasia. Neurobiol Aging 2012, 33: 744-752. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.05.020PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Neary D, Snowden J, Mann D: Frontotemporal dementia. Lancet Neurol 2005, 4: 771-780. 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70223-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Goldman JS, Farmer JM, Wood EM, Johnson JK, Boxer A, Neuhaus J, Lomen-Hoerth C, Wilhelmsen KC, Lee VM, Grossman M: Comparison of family histories in FTLD subtypes and related tauopathies. Neurology 2005, 65: 1817-1819. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000187068.92184.63View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Hutton M, Lendon CL, Rizzu P, Baker M, Froelich S, Houlden H, Pickering-Brown S, Chakraverty S, Isaacs A, Grover A: Association of missense and 5 -splice-site mutations in tau with the inherited dementia FTDP-17. Nature 1998, 393: 702-705. 10.1038/31508View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Watts GD, Wymer J, Kovach MJ, Mehta SG, Mumm S, Darvish D, Pestronk A, Whyte MP, Kimonis VE: Inclusion body myopathy associated with Paget disease of bone and frontotemporal dementia is caused by mutant valosin-containing protein. Nat Genet 2004, 36: 377-381. 10.1038/ng1332View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Dai RM, Li CC: Valosin-containing protein is a multi-ubiquitin chain-targeting factor required in ubiquitin-proteasome degradation. Nat Cell Biol 2001, 3: 740-744. 10.1038/35087056View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Holm IE, Isaacs AM, Mackenzie IR: Absence of FUS-immunoreactive pathology in frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 3 (FTD-3) caused by mutation in the CHMP2B gene. Acta Neuropathol 2009, 118: 719-720. 10.1007/s00401-009-0593-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Skibinski G, Parkinson NJ, Brown JM, Chakrabarti L, Lloyd SL, Hummerich H, Nielsen JE, Hodges JR, Spillantini MG, Thusgaard T: Mutations in the endosomal ESCRTIII-complex subunit CHMP2B in frontotemporal dementia. Nat Genet 2005, 37: 806-808. 10.1038/ng1609View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Baker M, Mackenzie IR, Pickering-Brown SM, Gass J, Rademakers R, Lindholm C, Snowden J, Adamson J, Sadovnick AD, Rollinson S: Mutations in progranulin cause tau-negative frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17. Nature 2006, 442: 916-919. 10.1038/nature05016View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Gass J, Cannon A, Mackenzie IR, Boeve B, Baker M, Adamson J, Crook R, Melquist S, Kuntz K, Petersen R: Mutations in progranulin are a major cause of ubiquitin-positive frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Hum Mol Genet 2006, 15: 2988-3001. 10.1093/hmg/ddl241View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. DeJesus-Hernandez M, Mackenzie IR, Boeve BF, Boxer AL, Baker M, Rutherford NJ, Nicholson AM, Finch NA, Flynn H, Adamson J: Expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in noncoding region of C9ORF72 causes chromosome 9p-linked FTD and ALS. Neuron 2011, 72: 245-256. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.011PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Renton AE, Majounie E, Waite A, Simon-Sanchez J, Rollinson S, Gibbs JR, Schymick JC, Laaksovirta H, van Swieten JC, Myllykangas L: A hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72 is the cause of chromosome 9p21-linked ALS-FTD. Neuron 2011, 72: 257-268. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.010PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Majounie E, Renton AE, Mok K, Dopper EG, Waite A, Rollinson S, Chio A, Restagno G, Nicolaou N, Simon-Sanchez J: Frequency of the C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Neurol 2012, 11: 323-330. 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70043-1PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Gijselinck I, Van Langenhove T, van der Zee J, Sleegers K, Philtjens S, Kleinberger G, Janssens J, Bettens K, Van Cauwenberghe C, Pereson S: A C9orf72 promoter repeat expansion in a Flanders-Belgian cohort with disorders of the frontotemporal lobar degeneration-amyotrophic lateral sclerosis spectrum: a gene identification study. Lancet Neurol 2012, 11: 54-65. 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70261-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Whitwell JL, Xu J, Mandrekar J, Boeve BF, Knopman DS, Parisi JE, Senjem ML, Dickson DW, Petersen RC, Rademakers R: Frontal asymmetry in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: clinicoimaging and pathogenetic correlates. Neurobiol Aging 2012, 34: 636-639.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Arighi A, Fumagalli GG, Jacini F, Fenoglio C, Ghezzi L, Pietroboni AM, De Riz M, Serpente M, Ridolfi E, Bonsi R: Early onset behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia due to the C9ORF72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion: psychiatric clinical presentations. J Alzheimers Dis 2012, 31: 447-452.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Al-Sarraj S, King A, Troakes C, Smith B, Maekawa S, Bodi I, Rogelj B, Al-Chalabi A, Hortobagyi T, Shaw CE: p62 positive, TDP-43 negative, neuronal cytoplasmic and intranuclear inclusions in the cerebellum and hippocampus define the pathology of C9orf72-linked FTLD and MND/ALS. Acta Neuropathol 2011, 122: 691-702. 10.1007/s00401-011-0911-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Boeve BF, Boylan KB, Graff-Radford NR, DeJesus-Hernandez M, Knopman DS, Pedraza O, Vemuri P, Jones D, Lowe V, Murray ME: Characterization of frontotemporal dementia and/or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with the GGGGCC repeat expansion in C9ORF72. Brain 2012, 135: 765-783. 10.1093/brain/aws004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Sieben A, Van Langenhove T, Engelborghs S, Martin JJ, Boon P, Cras P, De Deyn PP, Santens P, Van Broeckhoven C, Cruts M: The genetics and neuropathology of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Acta Neuropathol 2012, 124: 353-372. 10.1007/s00401-012-1029-xPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Edwards TL, Scott WK, Almonte C, Burt A, Powell EH, Beecham GW, Wang L, Zuchner S, Konidari I, Wang G: Genome-wide association study confirms SNPs in SNCA and the MAPT region as common risk factors for Parkinson disease. Ann Hum Genet 2010, 74: 97-109. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2009.00560.xPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Rademakers R, Cruts M, van Broeckhoven C: The role of tau (MAPT) in frontotemporal dementia and related tauopathies. Hum Mutat 2004, 24: 277-295. 10.1002/humu.20086View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Mackenzie IR, Neumann M, Baborie A, Sampathu DM, Du Plessis D, Jaros E, Perry RH, Trojanowski JQ, Mann DM, Lee VM: A harmonized classification system for FTLD-TDP pathology. Acta Neuropathol 2011, 122: 111-113. 10.1007/s00401-011-0845-8PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. He Z, Bateman A: Progranulin (granulin-epithelin precursor, PC-cell-derived growth factor, acrogranin) mediates tissue repair and tumorigenesis. J Mol Med (Berl) 2003, 81: 600-612. 10.1007/s00109-003-0474-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Van Damme P, Van Hoecke A, Lambrechts D, Vanacker P, Bogaert E, van Swieten J, Carmeliet P, Van Den Bosch L, Robberecht W: Progranulin functions as a neurotrophic factor to regulate neurite outgrowth and enhance neuronal survival. J Cell Biol 2008, 181: 37-41. 10.1083/jcb.200712039PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Yin F, Banerjee R, Thomas B, Zhou P, Qian L, Jia T, Ma X, Ma Y, Iadecola C, Beal MF: Exaggerated inflammation, impaired host defense, and neuropathology in progranulin-deficient mice. J Exp Med 2010, 207: 117-128. 10.1084/jem.20091568PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Weihl CC, Pestronk A, Kimonis VE: Valosin-containing protein disease: inclusion body myopathy with Paget’s disease of the bone and fronto-temporal dementia. Neuromuscul Disord 2009, 19: 308-315. 10.1016/j.nmd.2009.01.009PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Ju JS, Weihl CC: p97/VCP at the intersection of the autophagy and the ubiquitin proteasome system. Autophagy 2010, 6: 283-285. 10.4161/auto.6.2.11063PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Ju JS, Weihl CC: Inclusion body myopathy, Paget’s disease of the bone and fronto-temporal dementia: a disorder of autophagy. Hum Mol Genet 2010, 19: R38-R45. 10.1093/hmg/ddq157PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Suzuki M, Lee HC, Kayasuga Y, Chiba S, Nedachi T, Matsuwaki T, Yamanouchi K, Nishihara M: Roles of progranulin in sexual differentiation of the developing brain and adult neurogenesis. J Reprod Dev 2009, 55: 351-355. 10.1262/jrd.20249PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Ahmed Z, Sheng H, Xu YF, Lin WL, Innes AE, Gass J, Yu X, Wuertzer CA, Hou H, Chiba S: Accelerated lipofuscinosis and ubiquitination in granulin knockout mice suggest a role for progranulin in successful aging. Am J Pathol 2010, 177: 311-324. 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090915PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Gijselinck I, Van Broeckhoven C, Cruts M: Granulin mutations associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration and related disorders: an update. Hum Mutat 2008, 29: 1373-1386. 10.1002/humu.20785View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Pan and Chen; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.