From: Why do ‘OFF’ periods still occur during continuous drug delivery in Parkinson’s disease?
Study | Number of participants | Average follow-up duration (months) | Reduction of daily ‘OFF’ time (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Nilsson et al. [111] | 28 | 37 | 18 |
Eggert et al. [112] | 13 | 12 | 70 |
Antonini et al. [113] | 22 | 24 | 46 |
Antonini et al.[108] | 19 | 14 | 68 |
Santos-Garcia et al. [114] | 9 | 170 | 91 |
Merola et al. [115] | 20 | 15 | 68 |
Fasano et al. [116] | 14 | 25 | 49 |
Fernandez et al. [117] | 192 | 21 | 58 |
Foltynie et al. [118] | 12 | 12 | 43 |
Zibetti et al. [119] | 25 | 36 | 50 |
Antonini et al. [120] | 98 | 24 | 38 |
Zibetti et al. [121] | 59 | 26 | 49 |
Caceres-Redondo et al. [122] | 29 | 24 | 58 |
Sensi et al. [123] | 28 | 24 | 57 |
Lundqvist et al. [124] | 10 | 12 | 71 |
Fernandez et al. [125] | 272 | 12 | 66 |
Calandrella et al. [126] | 35 | 32 | 54 |
Buongiorno et al. [127] | 72 | 22 | 56 |
Slevin et al. [128] | 62 | 13 | 46 |
Lopiano et al. [129] | 145 | 14 | 57 |
Vallderiola et al. [130] | 177 | 35 | 66 |
Merola et al. [131] | 20 | 62 | 55 |
Chang et al. [132] | 15 | 12 | 71 |
De Fabregues et al. [133] | 23 | 44 | 82 |
Antonini et al. [134] | 375 | 24 | 65 |
Standaert et al. [135] | 38 | 14 | 74 |
Juhasz et al. [136] | 34 | 12 | 84 |
Zibetti et al. [137] | 32 | 31 | 62 |
Fernandez et al. [138] | 86 | 49 | 67 |
Lopiano et al. [139] | 145 | 36 | 50 |
Fabbri et al. [140] | 44 | 52 | 60 |
Popa et al. [141] | 24 | 12 | 29 |
Standaert et al. [142] | 195 | 12 | 65 |
Weighted average improvement in OFF time* | 59.8 |