From: Why do ‘OFF’ periods still occur during continuous drug delivery in Parkinson’s disease?
Study | Number of participants | Average follow-up duration (months) | Reduction of daily ‘OFF’ time (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Stibe et al. [68] | 11 | 8 | 62 |
Chaudhuri et al. [69] | 7 | 11 | 85 |
Frankel et al. [70] | 25 | 22 | 55 |
Pollak et al. [71] | 9 | 10 | 67 |
Hughes et al. [72] ± | 22 | 36 | 59 |
Stocchi et al. [73] | 10 | 12 | 58 |
Poewe et al. [74] | 18 | 20 | 58 |
Kreczy-Kleedorfer et al. [75] | 14 | 26 | 77 |
Gancher et al. [76] | 6 | 3 | 58 |
Colzi et al. [77] ± | 19 | 35 | 72 |
Pietz et al. [78] ± | 25 | 44 | 50 |
Wenning et al. [79] ± | 16 | 57 | 55 |
Kanovsky et al. [80] | 12 | 24 | 80 |
Manson et al. [81] ± | 64 | 34 | 49 |
Di Rosa et al. [82] | 12 | 12 | 40 |
Morgante et al. [83] | 12 | 24 | 60 |
Katzenschlager et al. [84] | 12 | 6 | 38 |
De Gaspari et al. [85] | 13 | 12 | 51 |
Garcia-Ruiz et al. [86] | 82 | 20 | 80 |
Martinez-Martin et al. [87] | 17 | 6 | 65 |
Antonini et al. [88] | 12 | 60 | 49 |
Drapier et al. [89] | 23 | 12 | 36 |
Borgemeester et al. [90] | 45 | 26 | 45 |
Sesar et al. [91] | 230 | 26 | 78 |
Sesar et al. [92]* | 18 | 16 | 74 |
Papuc et al. [93] ± | 9 | 24 | 86 |
Isaacson et al. [94] | 99 | 3 | 47 |
Katzenschlager et al. [60] | 84 | 52 | 53 |
Weighted average improvement in OFF time** | 62.4 |