Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of exosome isolation methods for clinical applications

From: A new paradigm for diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases: peripheral exosomes of brain origin

Method

Yield/purity

Time

Consumables/equipment

Advantages

Disadvantages

Ultracentrifugation

Low

2–3 h

Low cost for reagents

Classical method

Large sample volumes are required

Requires an ultracentrifuge

Standardized protocol

Time-consuming

Large sample capacity

Further purification steps are required

Only well-equipped laboratories can use

Immunoaffinity-based approaches

Low yield, high purity

4–12 h

High cost for reagents

Allow enrichment of cell-specific exosomes by targeting surface markers

Time-consuming

Commercial kits are available

Require low sample volume

Selection of markers is challenging

No special lab equipment is required

Commercial kits are available

Polymer precipitation

High

4–24 h

High cost for reagents

Commercial kits are available

Time-consuming

Commercial kits are available

Requires low sample volume

Expensive

No special equipment is required

Microfluidic devices

High

Depends on the technology

Very high cost for development of technology

Various sorting mechanisms can be employed

Require trained and skilled personnel

No commercial kits are available

Need standardization and validation

Must be designed by researchers themselves

Scalability is a problem currently

Clustering and scattering

High

20 min

Low cost for reagents

Allows a wide range of sample volume

Need validation

No special equipment is required

High scalability and purity

Nanotechnology (nanowires)

High

30 min

High cost for reagents

High purity

Does not allow a large amount of sample

Commercially available nanowires

Small sample volumes are required

Size exclusion chromatography

Low yield, high purity

20 min

High cost for reagents

High purity

Large sample volumes are required for subtyping

Commercial columns are available

High integrity

Low yield

Expensive