Skip to main content

Table 2 Examples of potential endpoints for disease-modification trials in prodromal PD

From: Prodromal Parkinson's disease: hype or hope for disease-modification trials?

Type of marker

Outcome (endpoint)

Availability of data from studies in prodromal cohorts

Availability of data from studies in early PD patients

Advantages

Disadvantages

Clinical marker

Phenoconversion to clinically defined PD

Assessed in many unselected and preselected population-based cohorts [27, 33, 34, 38, 43], assessed in iRBD [13, 37, 44, 73]

NA

Represents the essence of prophylactic therapies

May require long trial duration of 5 or more years, difficulties in determining the exact time point of phenoconversion

Motor progression (e.g., motor parts of the MDS-UPDRS/UPDRS)

Assessed in population-based [74] and iRBD cohorts [75, 76]

Assessed in early PD patients [77,76,79]; MDS-UPDRS Part II scores increased 1.0 point per year, and Part III scores increased 2.4 points per year, steepest increment observed in year 1

Shorter intervals due to continuous outcome

Motor progression might be slow in the early “premotor” phase (but accelerates shortly before diagnosis and in very early PD)

Non-motor progression

Assessed in population-based [74] and iRBD cohorts [75, 76]

Assessed in early PD patients [78, 80]

Non-motor progression may be faster in “premotor” stages than motor progression

Heterogeneous outcome

Progression of the prodromal PD score

Assessed in TREND [33], PMPP [81], and in a LRRK2 cohort [38]; results suggest the progression may only be seen in true prodromal PD cases that may indeed go on to develop PD

NA

Universal outcome that seems to be very different in true prodromal cases versus healthy controls

Large interindividual variability [33]

Imaging marker

Decline in striatial dopaminergic binding

Assessed in the PARS cohort (5% decline per year) [43] and in iRBD patients (6% decline per year) [82]

Assessed in early PD patients in the PPMI cohort [79] and in disease-modification trials [64, 66]

Objective, quantifiable, correlates with disease severity

Represents surrogate marker, expensive, requires multiple resources

Progression of MRI markers [53]

NA

Free-water imaging [83]

Neuromelanin imaging [84, 85]

Objective, quantifiable, correlates with disease severity

Represents surrogate marker, expensive, requires specialized MRI

Biochemical marker

Change in alpha-synuclein in CSF

Assessed in individuals with prodromal PD in the PPMI cohort [86]

Assessed in the PPMI cohort [86, 87]

Lower in PD patients and individuals with prodromal PD

No change over time observed in early PD patients; no correlation with disease progression or ongoing neurodegeneration in MDS-UPDRS and DAT-Scan results; contradicting results

RT-QuIC-assessed alpha-synuclein

Assessed only as disease state biomarker [58, 62]; but not yet as progression biomarker

Assessed only as disease state biomarker [57, 59,60,61]; but not yet as progression biomarker

Highly sensitive

Not yet assessed in term of progression marker. Specialized lab equipment

  1. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; DAT, dopamine transporter; iRBD, idiopathic REM-sleep behaviour disorder; LRRK2, leucine-rich repeat kinase 2; MDS, Movement Disorders Society; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NA, not assessed; PMPP, Progression Markers in the Premotor Phase study; PPMI, Parkinson’s progression marker initiative; TREND, Tuebinger evaluation of Risk factors for Early detection of NeuroDegeneration study; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; RT-QuIC, Real-time quaking-induced conversion