Skip to main content

Table 3 Randomized controlled trials comparing STN and GPi DBS

From: Deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease

Author, year

Number of patients

Follow up

Side

Similar results

Differences in results

Anderson et al., 2005 [115]

20

12 months

Bilateral

-Motor symptoms

-Greater decrease in dopaminergic drug dosage with STN.

 

-Cognitive and behavioral complications exclusively with STN.

Okun et al., 2009 [116]

45

7 months

Unilateral

-Motor symptoms.

-Worse verbal fluency with STN.

-Side effects including mood and cognition.

-Greater improvement in QOL with GPi [117].

 

-Higher risk to require controlateral DBS implant in STN group [112].

Follett et al., 2010 [57]

299

24 months

Bilateral

-Motor symptoms.

-Greater decrease in dopaminergic drug dosage with STN.

-Side effects profile.

-Worse decline in visuomotor processing with STN

-Depression improved with GPi but worsened with STN.

Weaver et al., 2012 [118]

159

36 months

Bilateral

-Motor symptoms.

-Greater decrease in dopaminergic drug with STN.

-Side effects profile.

-Worse cognitive performance with STN

Odekerken et al., 2013 [119]

128

12 months

Bilateral

-Quality of life.

-Greater decrease in dopaminergic drug dosage with STN.

-Cognitive, psychiatric and behavioral side effects

-Greater improvement in the OFF phase motor score with STN

 

- Greater improvement in disability with STN

  1. Legend: STN: subthalamic nucleus; GPi: Globus pallidum pars interna; DBS: deep brain stimulation; QOL: quality of life.